Lennox-Gastaut syndrome
=======================

* Muradi H. Al-Banji
* Doaa K. Zahr
* Mohammed M. Jan

## Management update

## Abstract

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe pediatric epilepsy syndrome characterized by mixed seizures, cognitive decline, and generalized slow (<3Hz) spike wave discharges on electroencephalography. Atonic seizures result in dangerous drop attacks with risks of injury and impairment of the quality of life. The seizures are frequently resistant to multiple antiepileptic (AED) drugs. Newer AEDs, such as rufinamide, are now available. When multiple AED trials fail, non-pharmacological treatments such as the ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation, and epilepsy surgery, should be considered. The aim of this review is to present an updated outline of LGS and the available treatments. Although the prognosis for complete seizure control remains poor, the addition of newer therapies provides an improved hope for some of these patients and their families. Further long term randomized controlled trials are required to compare different therapeutic interventions in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe pediatric epilepsy syndrome characterized by multiple seizure types including tonic, atonic, atypical absence, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures.1 These are associated with generalized slow (<3 Hz) spike wave discharges on electroencephalography (EEG) and cognitive decline.2 Lennox-Gastaut syndrome develops during the first decade of life, typically between 3-5 years of age and is more common in males.3 It accounts for up to 10% of all cases of childhood epilepsy.4,5 Up to 80% of patients suffer from seizures that are refractory to multiple antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment.6 Many patients continue to have daily seizures resulting in significant morbidity and deterioration in the quality of their life.7 The objective of this review is to present an updated outline of LGS and the different pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

### Clinical features

Some clinical features, such as cognitive decline, may not be apparent at the onset of the seizures. This makes early diagnosis difficult; however, the syndrome will evolve over a few months-years and subsequently all classical features will appear.8,9 Tonic seizures, which are the hallmark of the syndrome, may be quite subtle and may only appear during sleep.10 In addition, atonic and atypical absence seizures may appear later on or may be difficult to recognize in younger children.11,12 Eventually, 80% of children will develop tonic seizures, 65% develop atonic seizures, 60% develop atypical absence seizures, and 55% develop generalized tonic-clonic seizures.13 Myoclonic and partial seizures are less common. Comorbid behavioral, sleep, and learning difficulties are frequently encountered.

### Etiology and classification

Most children with LGS (75%) have an underlying structural (symptomatic) brain abnormality.14 These include developmental cortical malformations, neurocutaneous syndromes, post hypoxic-ischemic insult, post meningitis/encephalitis, or metabolic encephalopathy. Prior history of infantile spasms, frequently symptomatic, is reported in up to 60% of patients.15,16 The syndrome is unknown (cryptogenic) in 25% of patients. While an idiopathic (genetic) category is not well established, positive family history of epilepsy was noted in as many as 30% of families.17 Patients with the SCN1A gene mutation may rarely develop features suggestive of LGS.18,19 It is important to note that multiple seizure types, cognitive decline, and slow spike wave EEG pattern may all be seen in children with Dravet or Doose syndrome.20 Other characteristic clinical and EEG features should help in distinguishing between these syndromes, as will be discussed later in the differential diagnosis section.

### Electroencephalography

Typical EEG features include slow background rhythm and slow (<3 Hz) spike wave discharges, which may not be present at seizure onset.21 The characteristic slow epileptiform discharges are generalized and bilaterally synchronous, occurring intermittently in bursts of varying duration. Near continuous runs of generalized slow spike wave discharges are less common, and could suggest non-convulsive status epilepticus. Focal and multifocal epileptiform discharges are also common. Generalized paroxysmal fast rhythm (>10 Hz) with frontal emphasis can be seen during sleep and is associated with nocturnal tonic seizures.22 Patients with LGS are at a high risk of developing non-convulsive status epilepticus, which may be missed clinically, or diagnosed late.23 A high index of suspicion should be maintained, and the parents should be instructed regarding the possible signs and symptoms for early recognition. The initial typical EEG changes may eventually evolve to a more focal type or disappear with time, particularly with better seizure control.24

### Differential diagnosis

Table 1 summarizes the possible causes of drug resistant seizures. Every effort should be made to exclude an underlying treatable metabolic or structural pathology. Atonic seizures are also seen in patients with Doose syndrome.25,26 These children tend to be younger at seizure onset and remain cognitively normal. However, cognitive decline may be noted if the diagnosis is missed or delayed, and the seizures continue. Tonic seizures are uncommon in Doose syndrome and drop attacks are the result of negative myoclonus. In addition, the EEG has normal background rhythms with relatively faster generalized spike wave discharges and central theta activity. The generalized paroxysmal fast rhythm that is seen in LGS is lacking.26 Doose syndrome responds better to AED treatment and has a more favorable prognosis.26 Dravet syndrome is another syndrome that may be confused with LGS. Patients usually present with prolonged febrile seizures and myoclonus is commonly encountered.27 The diagnosis is usually poor. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is needed for better family counseling regarding the clinical course and outcome.

View this table:
[Table 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/3/207/T1)

Table 1 
Differential diagnoses of drug resistant epilepsy.

### Treatment update

Every effort should be made to achieve complete seizure control; however, in many cases only reduction in seizure frequency and severity is possible.28 Better seizure control will lead to enhanced alertness, behavior, and reduced risks of injury, all leading to improved quality of life for both the child and the family.29 While trying to do so, it is important to avoid drug related side effects and worsening of the associated comorbidities. This may be inevitable with polytherapy; therefore, careful monitoring of drug levels, side effects, and drug interactions is needed.30 Table 2 summarizes some important causes of intractable epilepsy that should be considered when the seizures are resistant to multiple AED treatments. The seizures can respond dramatically when deficient vitamin or cofactor is supplemented.

View this table:
[Table 2](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/3/207/T2)

Table 2 
Treatable inherited metabolic epilepsies.

### Pharmacological treatments

To date, comparative drug studies in patients with LGS are not available. However, most practitioners agree that valproic acid is the first drug of choice.31,32 Other helpful traditional AED treatments include benzodiazepines, such as clonazepam. The newer benzodiazepine, clobazam, has also been effectively used.33 Other traditional AEDs are less effective including ethusuximide and phenobarbitone, or may cause seizure worsening such as phenytoin and carbamazepines.34 Newer AEDs that are useful for patients with LGS include lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, lacosamide, and rufinamide (Table 3). Gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, and vigabatrin should be avoided because of lack of efficacy or possible worsening of myoclonic seizures.35,36 In addition, lacosaminde may also cause seizure worsening in some patients. Zonisamide and felbamate are available only in limited regions of the world and therefore are not discussed in this review. Two monotherapy trials are recommended before polytherapy is considered, however, most patients with LGS will eventually require AED combinations.37

View this table:
[Table 3](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/3/207/T3)

Table 3 
Doses of important antiepileptic drugs used for LGS.34

### Valproic acid

Valproic acid is highly effective for myoclonic, atypical absence, and atonic seizures.38 Some patients respond only to higher doses (>30-40 mg/kg/day). In this situation, careful monitoring of the drug level is needed. Valproic acid is also a potent hepatic inhibitor and should be used with caution in patients on lamotrigine because of the increased risk of severe skin rash.39 Serious hepatic toxicity is rare, but the drug should not be used if mitochondrial cytopathy is suspected. Tremor, hair loss, and weight gain are common side effects in older children. If the child becomes progressively sleepy or drowsy during treatment, serum ammonia should be obtained and L-carnitine should be started to treat any associated hyperammonemia. The drug has to be stopped if the condition does not improve, or the ammonia levels remain high.

### Benzodiazepines

Clonazepam and nitrazepam are effective longer acting benzodiazepines, but tolerance and side effects limit their use. Clobazam is a newer 1,5-benzodiazepine that is better tolerated and effective for all seizure types including drop attacks.33,40 It is associated with fewer side effects, which limited the use of older benzodiazepines, such as excessive drooling, lethargy, and sedation.33,40 Clobazam was also observed to be more effective at higher doses (maximum 2mg/kg/day), but side effects limit such practice.41 It is important to note that inducing excessive sedation and sleep with benzodiazepines may in fact, exacerbate the frequency of seizures.

### Lamotrigine

Lamotrigine can be highly effective, particularly when combined with valproic acid. However, serious skin rash evolving to Stevens-Johnson syndrome is a significant risk.42 This risk can be reduced by slower titration, however, leads to lowered antiepileptic effects.43 Parents should be warned of the risk of developing serious skin rash, and advised to report it promptly to the treating physician. Although the risk is small, it should be weighed against the potential benefits, particularly in children on valproic acid.

### Topiramate

Topiramate appears to have multiple modes of action including sodium channel blockade, GABA enhancement, glutamate antagonism, and weak carbonic anhydrase inhibition.44 These broad antiepileptic effects suggest an important therapeutic role. Topiramate was shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials.45 Cognitive, language, and behavioral problems were the most common side effects, particularly with higher doses.46,47 However, it has not been associated with any serious side effects. Poor appetite and weight loss can be a significant problem, particularly in young children.

### Levetiracetam

Levetiracetam has a mechanism of action distinct from that of other AEDs.48 The drug has a broad spectrum of antiepileptic properties and is highly effective for myoclonic seizures.49 It was found effective against other seizure types in patients with LGS; however, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to date. Except for irritability and behavioral disturbances, the drug is well tolerated.

### Rufinamide

Rufinamide is a newer AED that was recently approved for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with LGS. It has a wide spectrum of antiepileptic effects; however, its mechanism of action is not fully known.50,51 Rufinamide significantly reduced the frequency of generalized tonic clonic, absence, atypical absence, and atonic seizures. The drug can be quickly titrated to a maximum dose of 45 mg/kg/day.52 Side effects include somnolence, headache, vomiting, and skin rash. No serious side effects or significant drug interactions were reported.52 However, it is recommended to start rufinamide at a lower dose when combined with valproic acid.53

### Steroids

Adrenocorticotropic hormone, oral prednisone, and intravenous methylprednisolone were considered an option when other treatments fail or while preparing patients for non-pharmacological treatments. The efficacy and tolerability of steroids have not been fully established with a poorly understood mechanism of action.54 A short pulse of IV methylprednisolone has been used with significant benefits.55 In a recent study, IV methylprednisolone was given at 15 mg/kg/day followed by a weaning dose of oral prednisolone for one month.55 One third of the children became completely seizure free. At 6 months post-treatment, improved seizure control was noted in 59% of the children. Patients with mixed seizures, including LGS, were more likely to have a favorable response. The treatment was not associated with any major side effects. In fact, improvements in alertness and appetite were noted in 35% of the treated children.

### Non-pharmacological treatments

Despite the availability of many AEDs for the treatment of LGS, most patients fail to respond and therefore the following modalities can be attempted.

### Ketogenic diet

The ketogenic diet is an effective therapy for patients with LGS.56 It consists of a high fat low carbohydrate ratio. However, it requires a supportive team and committed parents. Up to 50% of patients achieve significant seizure reduction.57 However, the effectiveness may decline with time.58 Side effects include renal stones, hyperuricemia, acidosis, metabolic disturbance, vomiting, diarrhea, and hyperlipidemia. The long-term side effects are not well known.

### Vagus nerve stimulation

Vagal nerve stimulation has proven to have some effect in patients with LGS.59 Although its exact mechanism of action not well known, it is a useful alternative for patients that are not candidates for epilepsy surgery.60 The improvement in seizure control is gradual and continues over time with weekly increments of stimulation intensity.61 In addition, improvements in cognition, and mood may be associated.62 The occurrence of adverse events is low including laryngeal irritation, drooling, hoarseness, dysphagia, dyspnea, and cough.63 No life-threatening side effects have been reported.

### Epilepsy surgery

Partial or complete corpus callosotomy is a palliative procedure that results in significant reduction of the frequency of drop attacks. The improvements can be dramatic immediately after surgery with later recurrence. Potential side effects include decreased speech output, hemiparesis, gait disturbance, and disconnection syndrome. Partial corpus callosotomy (sectioning the anterior 2 thirds) involve better speech preservation; however, complete callosotomy is more effective.64 The procedure was also shown to reduce secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.65

### Long-term outcome

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome generally has a poor prognosis. Most patients will have drug resistant epilepsy, and up to 80% of patients may continue to have daily seizures.66 In adult LGS, patients tonic seizures during sleep remain the major seizure type.67 Risk factors for poor prognoses include history of infantile spasms, symptomatic etiology, severe cognitive dysfunction, and seizure onset before age 3 years. It remains to be proven how much of the cognitive decline is due to the underlying pathology versus the intractable epilepsy. There is some evidence that the early use of newer AEDs could limit the cognitive dysfunction, but only when associated with significant seizure reduction.68 In addition to multiple comorbidities, patients with LGS have an increased mortality rate of 5-17%. More than half of mortalities are a direct result of seizure related complications.66,68

In conclusion, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome typically results in drug resistant epilepsy of early onset and subsequent cognitive decline. Mixed seizures are associated with generalized slow spike and wave discharges on EEG and bursts of generalized fast poly spikes. The prognosis for complete seizure control is frequently poor. However, with the addition of newer antiepileptic drugs and other non-pharmacological therapies, improved hope is available for some of these patients and their families. Further long term randomized controlled trials are required, particularly to compare different therapeutic interventions in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

## Footnotes

*   Disclosure
    
    The authors disclose no affiliation or financial involvement with organizations or entities with a direct financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. No funding was received for this work from any organization.

*   Copyright: © Neurosciences

Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

## References

1.  Gastaut H, Roger J, Soulayrol R, Tassinari CA, Régis H, Dravet C, et al. (1966) Childhood epileptic encephalopathy with diffuse slow spike-waves (otherwise known as “petit mal variant”) or Lennox syndrome. Epilepsia 7, 139–179.
    
    

2.  Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes (1989) Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia 30, 389–399.
    
    

3.  Hancock EC, Cross HH (2009) Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD003277.
    
    

4.  Glauser T, Kluger G, Sachdeo R, Krauss G, Perdomo C, Arroyo S (2008) Rufinamide for generalized seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Neurology 70, 1950–1958.
    
    

5.  Michoulas A, Farrell K (2010) Medical management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. CNS Drugs 24, 363–374.
    
    

6.  Dulac O, N’Guyen T (1993) The Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 34, Suppl 7, S7–S17.
    
    

7.  Deekollu D, Besag FM, Aylett SE (2005) Seizure-related injuries in a group of young people with epilepsy wearing protective helmets: incidence, types and circumstances. Seizure 14, 347–353.
    
    

8.  Oguni H, Hayashi K, Osawa M (1996) Long-term prognosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 37, 44–47.
    
    

9.  Trevathan E, Murphy CC, Yeargin-Allsopp M (1997) Prevalence and descriptive epidemiology of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome among Atlanta children. Epilepsia 38, 1283–1288.
    
    

10. Ferlazzo E, Nikanorova M, Italiano D, Bureau M, Dravet C, Calarese T, et al. (2010) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in adulthood: clinical and EEG features. Epilepsy Res 89, 271–277.
    
    

11. Arzimanoglou A, French J, blume WT, Cross JH, Ernst JP, Feucht M, et al. (2009) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a consensus approach on diagnosis, assessment, management, and trial methodology. Lancet Neurol 8, 82–93.
    
    

12. Chevrie JJ, Aicardi J (1972) Childhood epileptic encephalopathy with slow spike-wave. A statistical study of 80 cases. Epilepsia 13, 259–271.
    
    

13. Goldsmith IL, Zupanc ML, Buchhalter JR (2000) Long-term seizure outcome in 74 patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: effects of incorporating MRI head imaging in defining the cryptogenic subgrou. Epilepsia 41, 395–399.
    
    

14. 1.  Niedermeyer E, 
    2.  Degen R
    
    Ohtahara S, Ohtsuka Y, Yoshinaga H, Oka E, Yoshinaga H, Sato M (1988) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Etiological considerations. in The Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, eds Niedermeyer E, Degen R (Alan R. Liss, Inc, New York (NY)), 47–63.
    
    

15. Camfield P, Camfield C (2007) Long-term prognosis for symptomatic (secondarily) generalized epilepsies: a population-based study. Epilepsia 48, 1128–1132.
    
    

16. Autry AR, Trevathan E, Van Naarden Braun K, Yeargin-Allsopp M (2010) Increased risk of death among children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and infantile spasms. J Child Neurol 25, 441–447.
    
    

17. Markand ON (2003) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (childhood epileptic encephalopathy). J Clin Neurophysiol 20, 426–441.
    
    

18. Harkin LA, McMahon JM, Iona X, Dibbens L, Pelekanos JT, Zuberi SM, et al. (2007) The spectrum of SCNIArelated infantile epileptic encephalopathies. Brain 130, 843–852.
    
    

19. Selmer KK, Lund C, Brandal K, Undlien dE, Brodtkorb E (2009) SCN1A mutation screening in adult patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome features. Epilepsia 50, 555–557.
    
    

20. Van Rijckevorsel K (2008) Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: overview and recent findings. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 4, 1001–1019.
    
    

21. Dulac O, N’Guyen T (1993) The Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 34, Suppl 7, S7–S17.
    
    

22. Niedermeyer E (2002) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Clinical description and diagnosis. Adv Exp Med Biol 497, 61–75.
    
    

23. Arzimanoglou A, French J, Blume WT, Cross JH, Ernst JP, Feucht M, et al. (2009) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a consensus approach on diagnosis, assessment, management, and trial methodology. Lancet Neurol 8, 82–93.
    
    

24. Yagi K (1996) Evolution of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A long-term longitudinal study. Epilepsia 37, 48–51.
    
    

25. Markand ON (2003) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (childhood epileptic encephalopathy). J Clin Neurophysiol 20, 426–441.
    
    

26. Doose H, Gerken H, Leonhardt R, Völzke E, Völz C (1970) Centrencephalic myoclonic-astatic petit mal. Neuropadiatrie 2, 59–78.
    
    

27. Jan MM, Girvin JP (2004) Febrile seizures. Update and controversies. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 9, 235–242.
    
    

28. Gallop K, Wild D, Verdian L, Kerr M, Jacoby A, Baker G, et al. (2010) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS): development of conceptual models of health-related quality of life (HRQL) for caregivers and children. Seizure 19, 23–30.
    
    

29. Carmant L, Whiting S (2012) lennox-Gastaut syndrome: an update on treatment. Can J Neurol Sci 39, 702–711.
    
    

30. VanStraten AF, Ng YT (2012) Update on the management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Pediatr Neurol 47, 153–161.
    
    

31. Wheless JW, Clarke DF, Carpenter D (2005) Treatment of pediatric epilepsy: expert opinion, 2005. J Child Neurol 20, S1–S56, quiz S59-S60.
    
    

32. Wheless JW, Clarke DF, Arzimanoglou A, Carpenter D (2007) Treatment of pediatric epilepsy: European expert opinion, 2007. Epileptic Disord 9, 353–412.
    
    

33. Jan MM, Shaabat AO (2000) Clobazam for the treatment of intractable childhood epilepsy. Saudi Med J 21, 622–624.
    
    

34. Jan MM (2005) Clinical review of pediatric epilepsy. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 10, 255–264.
    
    

35. Jan MM, Zuberi SA, Alsaihati BA (2009) Pregabalin: preliminary experience in intractable childhood epilepsy. Ped Neurol 40, 347–350.
    
    

36. Wheless JW, Clarke DF, Carpenter D (2005) Treatment of pediatric epilepsy: expert opinion, 2005. J Child Neurol 20, Suppl 1, S1–S56.
    
    

37. Montouris GD (2011) Rational approach to treatment options for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 52, 10–20.
    
    

38. Jeavons P, Clark J, Maheshwari M (1977) Treatment of generalized epilepsies of childhood and adolescence with sodium valproate (Epilim). dev Med Child Neurol 19, 9–25.
    
    

39. Jan MM (2007) Potentially serious Lamotrigine-related skin rash. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 12, 17–20.
    
    

40. Ng YT, Collins SD (2007) Clobazam. Neurotherapeutics 4, 138–144.
    
    

41. Ng YT, Conry JA, Drummond R, Stolle J, Weinberg MA (2011) OV-1012 Study Investigators. Randomized, phase III study results of clobazam in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Neurology 77, 1473–1481.
    
    

42. Messenheimer JA (1998) Rash in adult and pediatric patients treated with lamotrigine. Can J Neurol Sci 25, S14–S18.
    
    

43. Schmidt D, Bourgeois B (2000) A risk-benefit assessment of therapies for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Drug Saf 22, 467–477.
    
    

44. Jan MM, Baeesa SS, Shivji ZM (2003) Topiramate for the treatment of infants with early myoclonic encephalopathy. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 8, 110–112.
    
    

45. Sachdeo RC, Glauser TA, Ritter F, Reife R, Lim P, Pledger G (1999) A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Topiramate YL Study Group. Neurology 52, 1882–1887.
    
    

46. Hassan AA, Jan MM, Shaabat AO (2003) Topiramate for the treatment of intractable childhood epilepsy. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 8, 233–236.
    
    

47. TOP-INT-51 Investigator's Group (2002) Topiramate monotherapy as broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug in a naturalistic clinical setting. Seizure 14, 371–380.
    
    

48. Elsayed AM, Jan MM (2006) Levetiracetam in intractable childhood onset epilepsy. J Pediatr Neurol 4, 97–101.
    
    

49. De Los Reyes EC, Sharp GB, Williams JP, Hale SE (2004) Levetiracetam in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Pediatr Neurol 30, 254–256.
    
    

50. Bialer M, Johannessen S, Kupferberg H, Levy R, Loiseau P, Perucca E (2001) Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the fifth EILAT conference. Epilepsy Res 43, 11–58.
    
    

51. Wisniewski CS (2010) Rufinamide: a new antiepileptic medication for the treatment of seizures associated with lennox-gastaut syndrome. Ann Pharmacother 44, 658–667.
    
    

52. Kluger G, Glauser T, Krauss G, Seeruthun R, Perdomo C, Arroyo S (2010) Adjunctive rufinamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a longterm, open-label extension study. Acta Neurol Scand 122, 202–208.
    
    

53. Coppola G, Grosso S, Franzoni E, Veggiotti P, Zamponi N, Parisi P, et al. (2010) Rufinamide in children and adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: first Italian multicenter experience. Seizure 19, 587–591.
    
    

54. Gupta R, Appleton R (2005) Corticosteroids in the management of the paediatric epilepsies. Arch Dis Child 90, 379–384.
    
    

55. Almaabdi KH, Alshehri RO, Althubiti AA, Alsharef ZH, Mulla SN, Alshaer DS, et al. (2014) Intravenous methylprednisolone for intractable childhood epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 50, 334–336.
    
    

56. Bahassan NA, Jan MM (2006) Ketogenic diet. Update and application. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 11, 235–240.
    
    

57. You SJ, Kang HC, Ko TS, Kim HD, Yum MS, Hwang YS, et al. (2008) Comparison of corpus callosotomy and vagus nerve stimulation in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Brain Dev 30, 195–199.
    
    

58. Lemmon ME, Terao NN, Ng YT, Reisig W, Rubenstein JE, Kossoff EH (2012) Efficacy of the ketogenic diet in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a retrospective review of one institution's experience and summary of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol 54, 464–468.
    
    

59. Karceski SC (2001) Vagus nerve stimulation and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A review of the literature and data from the VNS Patient Registry. CNS Spectrums 6, 766–770.
    
    

60. Frost M, Gates J, Helmers SL, Wheless JW, Levisohn P, Tardo C, et al. (2001) Vagus nerve stimulation in children with refractory seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 42, 1148–1152.
    
    

61. You SJ, Kang HC, Ko TS, Kim HD, Yum MS, Hwang YS, et al. (2008) Comparison of corpus callosotomy and vagus nerve stimulation in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Brain Dev 30, 195–199.
    
    

62. Grill MF, Ng YT (2010) Dramatic first words spoken in 2 children after vagus nerve stimulation. Semin Pediatr Neurol 17, 54–57.
    
    

63. Cyberonics Inc. Physician's manual, VNS Therapy Pulse Model 102 Generator (2002) (Cyberonics Inc, Houston (TX)).
    
    

64. Maehara T, Shimizu H (2001) Surgical outcome of corpus callosotomy in patients with drop attacks. Epilepsia 42, 67–71.
    
    

65. Nei M, O’Connor M, Liporace J, Sperling MR (2006) Refractory generalized seizures: response to corpus callosotomy and vagal nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 47, 115–122.
    
    

66. Blume WT, David RB, Gomez MR (1973) Generalized sharp and slow wave complexes. Associated clinical features and long-term follow-up. Brain 96, 289–306.
    
    

67. Ferlazzo E, Nikanorova M, Italiano D, Bureau M, Dravet C, Calarese T, et al. (2010) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in adulthood: clinical and EEG features. Epilepsy Res 89, 271–277.
    
    

68. Chieffo D, Battaglia D, Lettori D, Del Re M, Brogna C, Dravet C, et al. (2011) Neuropsychological development in children with Dravet syndrome. Epilepsy Res 95, 86–93.