Maternal knowledge of acute seizures ==================================== * Nawal A. Asiri * Mohammed A. Bin Joubah * Samar M. Khan * Mohammed M. Jan ## Abstract **Objective:** To study maternal knowledge -of, and behavior during acute seizures. **Methods:** A cross sectional study conducted from September 2013 to January 2014 included consecutive mothers presenting at the Pediatric Neurology Clinics of King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A structured 30-item questionnaire was designed to examine their demographics, knowledge, and behavior on acute seizures. **Results:** A total of 92 mothers were interviewed and 41% witnessed at least one acute seizure in their affected child (range 1-15 years, mean 4.5). Up to 26% felt not knowledgeable at all regarding the acute care and management of seizure. Mothers with higher education (college or university degree) were more likely to feel very knowledgeable (19% versus 11%, *p*=0.02). Only 10% were aware of an antiepileptic drug that could be used at home to stop prolonged seizures, and 35% mentioned that they would wait for 15 minutes before taking the child to the emergency department. Most mothers (93%) wanted more information. Those who felt strongly regarding that (66%), were more likely to be younger (<27 years) (*p*=0.01), and have at least 3 out of 7 mismanagement decisions (*p*=0.003). **Conclusion:** Maternal level of knowledge and behavior during acute seizures needs improvement. Many mothers have significant misinformation, negative behavior, and poor management practices. Increased awareness and educational programs are needed. Seizures are the most common pediatric neurological emergency.1,2 Adequate education is important for their proper identification, intervention, and management.3,4 Parents’ behavior during an acute seizure is influenced by their knowledge and experience. Although parents generally feel informed about epilepsy and its management, many still have significant misconceptions and misinformation.5 Such misconceptions should be identified and corrected for optimal care and management. In a recent Saudi study,6 although most parents stated that they know what to do in an acute seizure situation, up to 14% performed unnecessary procedures, such as sprinkling water to the face, shaking, or carrying the child around. This behavior was less likely if the parents achieved college or university education. More inappropriate or potentially harmful procedures related to mythical concepts were reported from other developing countries, such as forcing liquids by mouth, pressure over body to restrain convulsive movements, or putting some object to force the teeth open.7 Our objectives were to study maternal knowledge -of and behavior during acute seizures, and identify correlating and contributing factors to their negative behavior and actions. These may include their personal and social experiences, as well as, their socio-economic and educational levels. These issues have received limited study in our region. We hypothesize that many families in Saudi Arabia are not properly informed on what to do during an acute seizure. Some are misinformed from unreliable sources leading to negative management decisions and practices. ## Methods A cross sectional study included consecutive mothers of children with epilepsy attending the Pediatric Neurology Outpatient Clinics of King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study sample was collected from September 2013 to January 2014. Only mothers of children with established epilepsy, defined as recurrent unprovoked seizures were included. A structured 30-item questionnaire was designed to examine the parent’s demographics, knowledge -of and behavior during acute seizures (Table 1). Two 4-point Likert scale item was included to examine the degree of knowledge regarding acute seizure management, and whether they need more information concerning that. Response categories were very much, moderately, somewhat, or not at all. An assigned coauthor conducted the interviews in a private room, and individually assisted the mothers to complete the questionnaire during a clinic visit. The King Abdulaziz University Hospital ethics committee approved the study design and questionnaire. All included parents consented voluntarily to the study. View this table: [Table 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/4/346/T1) Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of the studied families (n=92). Data were collected in Excel sheets and statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 17 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analyses were performed, and variables were examined using chi-square test. Statistical significance will be defined as *p*<0.05. ## Results A total of 92 mothers were interviewed. Most mothers (83%) were from the Jeddah area and 46% were Saudi Arabian nationality. Important social and demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The ages of their epileptic children ranged from 1-15 years (mean 4.2). The etiology of their epilepsy was unknown in 47% of cases, and they had variable seizure frequencies ranging from daily in 16.5%, weekly in 18.5%, monthly in 17%, or less frequent in 48%. The duration of their epilepsy at the time of enrollment ranged from 6 months to 8 years (mean 1.9 years). All children were receiving antiepileptic drugs ranging in number from 1-4 (mean 2). Thirty-eight mothers (41%) witnessed at least one prolonged acute seizure (>10 minutes) in their affected child (range 1-15, mean 4.5). Most mothers (74%) felt knowledgeable regarding their acute seizure management skills (22% very much, 24% moderately, and 28% somewhat knowledgeable). The remaining 26% felt not knowledgeable at all. Mothers with higher education (college or university degree) were more likely to feel very knowledgeable when compared with those with less education (19% versus 11%, *p*=0.02). The treating physician was the most common source of their knowledge in 44%, followed by the internet in 30%. Positive answers to key acute management questions are summarized in Table 2. Several misconceptions and poor management practices were identified. In addition, only 10% were aware of an antiepileptic drug that could be used at home to stop prolonged seizures. When asked on how long they would wait before taking their acutely seizing child to the emergency department, 35% mentioned that they would wait for 15 minutes before such a consideration. Most mothers (93%) needed more information (Figure 1). Those who felt strongly about that they needed more information (66%), were more likely to be of younger age (<27 years) (*p*=0.01), and to answer positively to at least 3 out of 7 of the mismanagement questions shown in Table 2 (*p*=0.003). No other correlations were found between mother’s knowledge, and other socio-demographic or economic variables. View this table: [Table 2](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/4/346/T2) Table 2 Important questions on acute seizure management and interventions asked from the mothers. ![Figure 1](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/20/4/346/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/4/346/F1) Figure 1 Results on the Likert scale item that examined the need for more information regarding acute seizure management. ## Discussion Our study documented that mothers of children with epilepsy are not well informed on what to do during acute seizures. They had significant misinformation, negative behavior, and poor management practices. Although many of them (41%) have experienced at least one prolonged (>10 minutes) seizure, their level of knowledge was not strong, and 26% felt not knowledgeable at all. As expected, mothers with higher education (college or university degree) were more likely to feel very knowledgeable about acute management when compared with those with less education. Other authors have found similar associations.5 As well, up to 1/3 of the mothers had poor acute management decisions (Table 2) including, unnecessary emergency room visits, trying to keep the child’s mouth open using their fingers, or any other object to prevent tongue biting, and sprinkling water onto the child’s face thinking that this will help them regain consciousness. Furthermore, 1/3 of the mothers mentioned that they would wait for 15 minutes before considering taking their acutely seizing child to the emergency department. A lower percentage of mothers insisted on keeping the child on her/his back during the seizure, would try to physically restrain the child to help stop the seizure, or shake her/him to help them regain consciousness (Table 2). These data are alarming as most of these interventions are not only ineffective, but also potentially harmful. Similar misconceptions have been reported from other developing countries with limited educational practices.8-11 We did not encounter other inappropriate, or potentially harmful procedures related to mythical concepts, such as forcing liquids by mouth, pressure over body to restrain convulsive movements, or putting some object to force the teeth open.7 Fortunately, only 4% of our mothers stated that they would give their seizing child an extra dose of the oral antiepileptic drug to help stop the seizure, which carries a significant risk for aspiration. This highlights the deficits in their knowledge and poor management interventions and decisions. In addition, only 10% of the included mothers were aware of an antiepileptic drug that could be used at home to stop prolonged seizures. This may be the result of their incomplete knowledge but also may reflect the management preferences of the treating physician. The overwhelming majority of the mothers needed more information (Figure 1). This highlights their weak knowledge, but may also reflect their inability to answer some of the given questions and scenarios with certainty. Indeed, this finding correlated significantly with the number of incorrect answers on the items shown in Table 2, and also to younger maternal age (<27 years). We found no additional correlations with the other socio-demographic or economic variables, which may be the result of our relatively small study sample. Other studies have found an influence of the socio-economic grade on the awareness and interaction with seizures.12 There are some limitations to our study. The sample was not large enough; however, it was relatively representative of children with epilepsy with variable ages and socio-demographic backgrounds. Parent’s reporting bias may have affected the results since the questions on their knowledge, and actions are predisposed to subjective judgments. We tried to overcome this problem by assigning one coauthor to personally assist all mothers in completing the questionnaire. Finally, the questionnaire is self-structured and hence has not been used or validated in previous studies. We conclude that the level of knowledge and behavior during acute seizures needs improvement. Many mothers have significant misinformation, negative behavior, and poor management practices. Increased awareness and educational programs are needed. The internet was an important source of information (30%) in our sample. This can be use for community education and increased awareness. Parents of children with epilepsy should be targeted by educational campaigns that focus on acute seizures and their management. ## Footnotes * Disclosure The authors declare no conflicting interests, support or funding from any drug company. * Received May 14, 2015. * Accepted September 9, 2015. * Copyright: © Neurosciences Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. ## References 1. Jan MM (2004) Perception of pediatric neurology among non-neurologists. J Child Neurol 19, 1–5. 2. Jan MM (2005) Clinical review of pediatric epilepsy. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 10, 255–264. 3. Muthaffar OY, Jan MM (2014) Public awareness and attitudes toward epilepsy in Saudi Arabia is improving. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 19, 124–126. 4. Abulhamail AS, Al-Sulami FE, Alnouri MA, Mahrous NM, Joharji DG, Albogami MM, et al. (2014) Primary school teacher's knowledge and attitudes toward children with epilepsy. Seizure 23, 280–283. 5. Gazibara T, Nikolovski J, Lakic A, Pekmezovic T, Kisic-Tepavcevic D (2014) Parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards children with epilepsy in Belgrade (Serbia). Epilepsy Behav 41, 210–216. 6. Zainy LE, Atteyah DM, Aldisi WM, Abdulkarim HA, Alhelo RF, Alhelali HA, et al. (2013) Parents`knowledge and attitudes toward children with epilepsy. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 18, 345–348. 7. Bains HS, Raizada N (1992) Parental attitudes towards epilepsy. Indian Pediatr 29, 1487–1490. 8. Maiga Y, Albakaye M, Diallo LL, Traoré B, Cissoko Y, Hassane S, et al. (2014) Current beliefs and attitudes regarding epilepsy in Mali. Epilepsy Behav 33, 115–121. 9. Wu KN, Lieber E, Siddarth P, Smith K, Sankar R, Caplan R (2008) Dealing with epilepsy: parents speak up. Epilepsy Behav 13, 131–138. 10. Caveness WF, Gallup GH Jr. (1980) A survey of public attitudes toward epilepsy in 1979 with an indication of trends over the past thirty years. Epilepsia 21, 509–518. 11. Vona P, Siddarth P, Sankar R, Caplan R (2009) Obstacles to mental health care in pediatric epilepsy: insight from parents. Epilepsy Behav 14, 360–366. 12. Parmar RC, Sahu DR, Bavdekar SB (2001) Knowledge, attitude and practices of parents of children with febrile convulsion. J Postgrad Med 47, 19–23.