Acute cervical cord infarction in anterior spinal artery territory with acute swelling mimicking myelitis
=========================================================================================================

* Hussam Abou Al-Shaar
* Iyad AbouAl-Shaar
* Mohammed Z. Al-Kawi

## Abstract

Acute infarction of the cervical segment of the spinal cord is extremely uncommon. Patients may present with signs and symptoms mimicking that of acute myelitis. On imaging, both conditions may present as a hyperintense area on T-2 weighted MRI. History of sudden onset is essential in establishing the diagnosis. We report a case of cervical spinal cord infarction in a 40-year-old man who was diagnosed with acute transverse myelitis, and was treated with high dose intravenous corticosteroids followed by 5 sessions of plasma exchange. An MRI of the spine revealed abnormal high T2 signal intensity extending from the C2 to C7 level involving the anterior two-thirds of the cord with more central involvement. The findings were consistent with anterior spinal artery territory cervical cord infarction.

Infarction of the spinal cord is rare.1,2 Presentation in the cervical region is unusual, especially at a young age. It mostly occurs in the territory of the anterior spinal artery.1 Infarction of the cervical cord may present with pain, paralysis, dissociated sensory loss, and autonomic deficits.1,2 The posterior columns are relatively spared.3,4 Acute myelitis, on the other hand, may lead to damage of the functional areas at the affected segment of the cord.5,6 Like infarction, patients may present with pain, weakness or paralysis, sensory, and autonomic deficits.3,4,6 The disease may be idiopathic or attributed to other CNS, or systemic etiologies.7 Magnetic resonance imaging is essential for the diagnosis of both entities, and may reveal an area of hyperintensity on T-2 weighted imaging, suggesting infarction, or inflammation.1,8,9 Therefore, both conditions may have similar appearance, and accurate diagnosis can be challenging. We report a case of cervical spinal cord infarction (SCI) in a 40-year-old man who presented with a sudden onset of neck and back pain and paralysis. In addition, a literature review on SCI is presented. Our objective in presenting this particular case is to highlight the rare occurrence of acute medullary swelling in the first few hours following cord infarction simulating acute myelitis.

## Case Report

A 40-year-old right-handed man with a known history of hypertension suddenly developed severe neck and back pain while driving. He was fully paralyzed, unable to walk, and developed numbness in all of his limbs. He was taken to the emergency room of a local hospital, where he was noted to have paralysis of all 4 limbs (quadriplegia), pain and temperature sensory loss below the neck, and urinary and bowel incontinence. Cranial nerves examination was unremarkable. There was no history of recent infections or vaccination. An MRI at presentation to the local hospital revealed intense swelling and high T2 signal in the cervical segment of the cord (Figure 1). He was transferred to our emergency department 7 days later. He was diagnosed with acute transverse myelitis, and was treated with high dose intravenous corticosteroids, followed by 5 sessions of plasma exchange with daily physiotherapy. Laboratory investigations including complete blood count, international normalized ratio, rapid plasma regain, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human immunodeficiency virus, enterovirus, coxsackie, arbovirus, mycoplasma, parvovirus, lyme, lupus, anticardiolipin, and hemocytsteine were unremarkable. Screening studies for vasculitis were negative. He had a neurogenic bladder, and a Foley catheter was placed. The CSF analysis revealed: glucose 4.34 mg/dL (normal range [NR]: 50-80 mg/dL), protein 291 mg/dL (NR: 15-60 mg/dL), 27 RBCs/mm3 (NR: 0 RBCs/mm3), <1 WBCs/mm3 (NR: 0-5 WBCs/mm3). A brain MRI was normal. After corticosteroids and plasma exchange, MRI of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine revealed cervical spinal cord abnormal high T2 signal intensity extending from C2 to C7 level, and predominantly involving the anterior two-thirds of the cord and tapering distally with more central involvement. The cord swelling had receded, and minimal patchy enhancement could be seen after contrast administration (**Figures 2 & 3**). Mild degenerative disc disease with no spinal cord compression was seen at multiple levels. The thoracic and lumbar spine was unremarkable. The findings were consistent with anterior spinal artery territory cervical cord infarction, and the diagnosis of infarction in the anterior spinal artery was established. He showed improvement in movement as indicated in Table 1. Reflexes were +1. Babinski response was negative. His sensations were as follows: vibration was absent in the upper limbs and reduced in the lower limbs; proprioception was intact in all limbs; pinprick was absent in all limbs; pinprick from the face to T2 level was intact; and pinprick and vibration below T2 level were absent. A follow up MRI 2 weeks later revealed interval improvement of high signal intensity, as well as improvement of enhancement seen in T2-weighted imaging of the spinal cord. He was advised to continue his rehabilitation and physiotherapy at an advanced center.

![Figure 1](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/20/4/372/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/4/372/F1)

Figure 1 
Sagittal T2 MRI demonstrating intense swelling and high T2 signal in the cervical segment of the cord.

![Figure 2](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/20/4/372/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/4/372/F2)

Figure 2 
Sagittal T2 MRI demonstrating: **A**) cervical spinal cord abnormal high T2 signal intensity extending from C2 to C7 level and predominantly involving the anterior two-thirds of the cord and tapering distally with more central involvement (arrow); and **B**) sagittal T1 MRI with contrast depicting minimal patchy enhancement.

![Figure 3](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/20/4/372/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/4/372/F3)

Figure 3 
Axial T2 MRI demonstrating abnormal high T2 signal intensity of the anterior cervical cord horns “owl’s eyes” sign (arrow).

View this table:
[Table 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/20/4/372/T1)

Table 1 
Motor examination after treatment of the patient with acute cervical cord infarction.

## Discussion

Myelitis is an uncommon inflammatory disorder of the spinal cord.9 The inflammatory reaction may damage areas of the spinal cord, leading to either temporary or permanent motor, sensory, or autonomic loss of function of variable extent.6 It may affect any segment of the spinal cord.5 Patients commonly present with subacute back pain along with motor, sensory, and autonomic deficits.3,5,6 Laboratory tests and CSF analysis may aid in establishing diagnosis and identification of the etiologic agent.5 Like infarction, myelitis may present as cord swelling at the level of the lesion on MRI T2-weighted images with hyperintensity.9 There is no definitive cure for acute transverse myelitis. Corticosteroids are usually administered to decrease inflammation and swelling, and to improve symptoms.5 Plasma exchange has also been suggested in moderate to severe cases. Rehabilitation is of a great importance in such patients.5

The cervical segment of the spinal cord receives its radicular vascularization from the V4 segment of the vertebral artery at the C3 level, and from the ascending cervical arteries at the levels of C6-C7. These small arteries are of great importance to the blood supply of the functional areas in the cord, especially through their connections with the anterior spinal artery.10,11 The spinal cord anterior horns, ventral spinothalamic tracts, the anterior segment of the lateral spinothalamic tracts, and lateral corticospinal tracts bilaterally obtain their vascular supply from the central branches of the anterior spinal artery.1,11

Unlike the cerebral arteries, the spinal arteries are positioned over a mobile structure, predisposing them to increased risk of injury. The radicular arteries are usually involved in movement injuries. Acute infarcts in the anterior spinal artery territory can be attributed to various causes. These include, but are not limited to, radicular artery occlusion, cervical disc herniation compressing the vasculature, trauma, vasculitis, iatrogenic injury during spinal surgery, spinal cord compression, epidural anesthesia, chronic arachnoiditis, vertebral artery dissection, vertebral artery stenosis due to atherosclerosis, stroke, prothrombin mutation, embolism, global hypotension, and cocaine misusage.1 Half of the reported SCI cases lack detectable etiology.2 Similarly, no identifiable etiology could be found in our case.

Infarction of the spinal cord is extremely uncommon.1,2 It occurs mostly in the anterior spinal artery territory. Unlike cerebral infarction, SCI lacks conclusive epidemiological data.1 Infarction of the cervical segment of the spinal cord is unusual. The number of reported cases in the medical literature remains small. This can be attributed to the abundance of collateral vessels supplying the spinal cord, making it relatively resistant to infarction.1,10

Infarction of the spinal cord presents with a sudden onset. The initiating event can be in the form of mechanical tension or sudden movement. When partial anterior spinal artery territory in the cervical segment is involved, patients may present with Horner syndrome on the same side of the infarction. The preservation of light touch, proprioception, and deep sensations is attributed to the dorsal column sparing along with the spinocerebellar tracts. The cervical and thoracolumbar segments of the spinal cord are very sensitive to ischemia. This can be attributed to the high density of motor neurons at those levels.12 Infarction of the anterior horns appears as “owl’s eyes” on MRI scan as seen in our patient (Figure 3).

The MRI remains the modality of choice for diagnosis of spinal infarction.8 It is important to rule out other causes, such as, tumors or cord compression. A hyperintense region on T2-weighted imaging demonstrating infarction is the typical finding on MRI for medullary infarction. Its appearance has been described as “pencil-like” in longitudinal sections by different authors. Such findings can only be demonstrated several hours after the onset of symptoms.8 In the cervical region, the hyperintensity tends to appear in the medial and central parts of the cord. The T1-weighted images may demonstrate medullary enlargement at the affected segment.1 Although only few studies described the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting cord infarction, it has been shown that DWI may increase the sensitivity in confirming SCI by depicting diffusion restriction in the acute settings.1,8

It has been reported that MRI features of SCI have a predictable course. In the acute stage (<24 hours), the MRI findings are usually normal, with no cord enlargement, gadolinium enhancement, or increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging. However, these features emerge and appear clearly on MRI after 1-2 days. On the contrary, nearly all patients with acute myelitis have increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging in the acute phase with 62-84% of them demonstrating gadolinium cord enhancement.13,14 This distinction in the acute phase may aid in differentiating between the 2 conditions. Therefore, it is essential to obtain repeated imaging in such patients in order to document the temporal profile of changes and facilitate accurate diagnosis.

Diagnosing SCI from the anterior spinal artery territory is based on acute onset of cord symptoms, neurological examination indicating dissociated sensations, MRI changes, and a high index of suspicion. The management of SCI remains controversial. Corticosteroids and/or anticoagulation for secondary prevention can be used. However, studies have failed to document that one of these treatments is superior to the other.15 The role of rehabilitation in these patients is essential. Patients should be encouraged to participate in rehabilitation programs for improvement of their symptoms.

In conclusion, acute medullary swelling is not typical in the first few hours following cord infarction. This case illustrates an unusual presentation of cervical cord infarction with acute swelling mimicking acute myelitis. Therefore, acute medullary infarction should be included in the differential diagnosis of acute cord swelling. A history of sudden onset along with detailed neurological examination, and radiological images are essential in establishing the diagnosis.

## Footnotes

*   Disclosure
    
    Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

*   Received February 10, 2015.
*   Accepted June 29, 2015.


*   Copyright: © Neurosciences

Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

## References

1.  Weidauer S, Nichtweiss M, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE (2002) Spinal cord infarction: MR imaging and clinical features in 16 cases. Neuroradiology 44, 851–857.
    
    

2.  Masson C, Pruvo JP, Meder JF, Cordonnier C, Touzé E, De La Sayette V, et al. (2004) Spinal cord infarction: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings and short term outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75, 1431–1435.
    
    

3.  Green M, Berliner J, Frontera J (2012) Pediatric idiopathic transverse myelitis presenting as an anterior cord syndrome: a case report. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 5, 1–6.
    
    

4.  Hayes KC, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL, Potter PJ, Delaney GA (2000) Classifying incomplete spinal cord injury syndromes: algorithms based on the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81, 644–652.
    
    

5.  Waldrup BC (2009) Identifying transverse myelitis in the emergency care arena. Adv Emerg Nurs J 31, 131–139.
    
    

6.  Cree BA, Wingerchuk DM (2005) Acute transverse myelitis: is the “idiopathic” form vanishing? Neurology 65, 1857–1858.
    
    

7.  Krishnan C, Kaplin AI, Deshpande DM, Pardo CA, Kerr DA (2004) Transverse Myelitis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Front Biosci 9, 1483–1499.
    
    

8.  Nardone R, Bergmann J, Kronbichler M, Lochner P, Caleri F, Tezzon F, et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging and motor-evoked potentials in spinal cord infarction: report of two cases. Neurol Sci 31, 505–509.
    
    

9.  Brinar VV, Habek M, Brinar M, Malojcić B, Boban M (2006) The differential diagnosis of acute transverse myelitis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108, 278–283.
    
    

10. Etz CD, Kari FA, Mueller CS, Silovitz D, Brenner RM, Lin HM, et al. (2011) The collateral network concept: a reassessment of the anatomy of spinal cord perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141, 1020–1028.
    
    

11. Kumral E, Polat F, Güllüoglu H, Uzunköprü C, Tuncel R, Alpaydin S (2011) Spinal ischaemic stroke: clinical and radiological findings and short-term outcome. Eur J Neurol 18, 232–239.
    
    

12. Duggal N, Lach B (2002) Selective vulnerability of the lumbosacral spinal cord after cardiac arrest and hypotension. Stroke 33, 116–121.
    
    

13. Alblas CL, Bouvy WH, Lycklama ÀNijeholt GJ, Boiten J (2012) Acute spinal-cord ischemia: evolution of MRI findings. J Clin Neurol 8, 218–223.
    
    

14. Weidauer S, Nichtweiss M, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE (2002) Spinal cord infarction: MR imaging and clinical features in 16 cases. Neuroradiology 44, 851–857.
    
    

15. de Seze J, Stojkovic T, Breteau G, Lucas C, Michon-Pasturel U, Gauvrit JY, et al. (2001) Acute myelopathies: Clinical, laboratory and outcome profiles in 79 cases. Brain 124, Pt 8, 1509–1521.