Early seizures in stroke – frequency, risk factors, and effect on patient outcomes in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia ========================================================================================================================= * Fatimah Alsaad * Norah Alkeneetir * Moath Almatroudi * Alhanouf Alatawi * Abeer Alotaibi * Omar Aldibasi * Ismail A. Khatri ## Abstract **Objectives:** To determine the frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of Early seizure (ES) after stroke in a Saudi cohort. **Methods:** A retrospective study was conducted in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, KSA. All stroke patients whether they had first or recurrent stroke were included from February 2016 to December 2017. Data were analyzed using the SAS software version 9.4. **Results:** Out of 665 patients, 456 (68.6%) were males and 564 (85.2%) were Saudis; the cohort’s mean age was 60.6±12.6 years. Fifty-one (7.7%) patients had ES, which were more common in women (*p*=0.0123). Loss of consciousness (*p*=0.0402) and confusion (<0.0007) were associated with ES, whereas unilateral weakness (*p*=0.001) and unilateral numbness (*p*=0.0317) at presentation decreased the risk of ES. Vascular risk factors did not differ between patients with and without ES. Hemorrhagic stroke was associated with ES (*p*=0.0054), whereas patients with small vessel disease were less likely to develop ES (*p*=0.0013). Patients with ES had more severe stroke (NIHSS >5) (*p*=0.0139), more ICU admissions (49% vs. 26.2%; *p*=0.0005), longer length of hospital stay (44.9 days vs. 24.9 days; *p*=0.0018), higher rates of stroke-related complications (e.g. recurrent stroke, pulmonary embolism, hospital acquired infections, and need for tracheostomy and gastrostomy tube placement) (*p*≤0.0001), and were likely to be more severely disabled defined as mRS 3–5 at discharge (47.7% vs. 40.8%; *p*=0.0055) or to die in hospital (11.8% vs. 4.6%; *p*≤0.0001). **Conclusion:** The ES after stroke were common in our cohort. Increased stroke severity and confusion were independent predictors of ES. The ES were associated with higher rates of in-hospital complications, longer length of hospital stay, and worse outcomes at discharge. **S**troke is one of the common causes of symptomatic seizures in the elderly. Post-stroke seizures (PSS) are commonly classified into early seizures (ES) and late seizures (LS).1 No specific cut-off point that delineates ES has been agreed upon, but most studies arbitrarily define ES as those that occur within 7–14 days of incident stroke.1-2 The PSS occurring beyond this period are considered LS. The incidence rate for ES after stroke is not well established, although it has been reported to be 2%–33%.2,3 A recent meta-analysis has found that ES incidence after ischemic stroke is 3.3%, whereas the LS incidence rate was found to be 18 per 1000 person-years.1 A study investigating seizures that occurred within 24 h of stroke onset has found an incidence of 3.1% in more than 6,000 stroke patients.3 Not all patients with PSS develop epilepsy. Approximately 2-4% of patients develop epilepsy after stroke.4 Data on the risk factors for ES after stroke are inconsistent. In some studies, cardioembolic stroke, cortical location of stroke, hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke, increased severity of stroke, and history of coronary artery disease or atrial fibrillation were found to be the predictors of ES after stroke.2,4-5 The ES after stroke are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and can affect the functional independence of stroke patients, resulting in poorer quality of life, as well as in increased resource utilization.3-6 However, evidence-based data on PSS and guidelines on PSS management remain lacking.6 The PSS are not uncommon and are broadly classified into ES and LS. Not all patients with ES develop post-stroke epilepsy.6 The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ES and LS are widely different. Having a specific time window to define ES from LS is crucial, as this may help in predicting post-stroke epilepsy. In the acute phase of stroke, ionic shifts, excitotoxicity neurotransmitters, metabolic dysfunction, and changes in coagulation cascade can all contribute to the early onset of seizure after an ischemic event.7-8 By contrast, LS results from persistent structural changes and gliosis that occur in the late phase of stroke, causing disruption in neuronal firing, circuit dysfunction, and eventually epileptogenic changes.7-8 The PSS has been studied in different populations; considering the observed variations in incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of PSS, we find it important to investigate this condition in the Saudi population. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of post stroke seizures in our population, and to identify the predictors of ES. It also looked at the outcome of these patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the earliest study to report data on ES after stroke in a Saudi cohort, and it may be useful in planning future large-scale studies on ES prevention and management. ## Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients admitted to the acute stroke unit of King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from February 2016 to December 2017. This study (RSS19/051/R) was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) on July 15, 2019. Informed consent was waived by the IRB given the retrospective nature of data collection, as no patient identifiers were included in the data. This study employed a consecutive non-random sampling method. Adult male and female patients aged 18 years and above and diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were included. Patients with a history of epilepsy, patients experiencing transient ischemic attack and cerebral vein thrombosis, and patients with a final diagnosis other than stroke (e.g., tumor, infection, and functional disorder) were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected from electronic health records (BestCare system). An ES is defined as a seizure that occurred within 7 days of incident stroke. Strokes were classified into ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Ischemic strokes were further classified based on the TOAST classification.9 The TOAST classification characterizes strokes into stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis, stroke due to cardioembolism, stroke due to small-vessel occlusion, stroke due to other determined etiology, and stroke of undetermined etiology (when there are 2 or more causes identified, the diagnostic evaluation is negative or the diagnostic evaluation is incomplete). Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), whereas stroke outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Moreover, length of hospital stay and stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) were determined. Vascular risk factors and stroke-related complications were identified from hospital records. Discharge disposition and discharge outcomes were obtained from discharge summaries. Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for the categorical data. Means with standard deviations were calculated for the numerical data. Univariate analyses were performed using Chi-square test and t-test. Multivariate analysis was applied using multivariable logistic regression analysis, when indicated. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were expressed relative to a reference (baseline) category. A *p*-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. ## Results A total of 665 stroke patients were studied, 456 (68.6%) of whom were males and 564 (85.2%) were Saudis. The cohort’s mean age was 60.6±12.6 years (age range was 18 to 96 years). The ES occurred in 51 patients (7.7%). The mean age of patients with ES was 60.5±13.8 years. More women (24/209) had developed ES after stroke than men (27/456) (p=0.0123). Table 1 presents the age, gender distribution, and vascular risk factors of the patients. View this table: [Table 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/27/2/104/T1) Table 1 - Demographic profile, stroke presentation, timing of presentation, and vascular risk factors in patients with and without early seizure (ES). Patients with and without ES had similar clinical presentations (Table 1). The ES patients were more likely to present with loss of consciousness (19.6% vs. 10.3%; *p*=0.0402) and confusion (23.5% vs. 8.8%; *p*=0.0007), whereas those who presented with unilateral weakness (47.1% vs. 69.5%; *p*=0.0010) or unilateral numbness (7.8% vs. 20.2%; *p*=0.0317) were less likely to experience ES. The time from symptom onset to presentation did not differ between the two groups (*p*=0.2399). The vascular risk factors were also similar between the groups. The incidence of ES did not differ between those who had a first stroke (66% vs. 65%; *p*=0.8858) and those with a recurrent stroke (33.3% vs. 35.2%; *p*=0.8009). Patients who had hemorrhagic strokes (25.5%) were more likely to develop ES than those who had ischemic strokes (11.9%) (*p*=0.0054). Patients with small vessel disease were less likely to experience ES (7.8% vs. 28.7%; *p*=0.0013). Table 2 summarizes the TOAST classification of strokes in patients with and without ES. Patients with ES had a more severe stroke (NIHSS >5) at presentation than those without ES (57.1% vs. 39.5%; *p*=0.013). View this table: [Table 2](http://nsj.org.sa/content/27/2/104/T2) Table 2 - Stroke types and severity at the time of presentation in patients with and without early seizure (ES). Nearly two-thirds (36 of the 51) patients with ES had seizures on the first day after stroke. Patients with ES were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (*p*=0.0005). Moreover, ICU stay was longer in patients with ES than in those without ES (18.9 days vs. 10.6 days), although the difference was not significant. The total length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with ES than in patients without ES (26.7 days vs. 13.7 days; *p*=0.0018). The incidence rates of stroke-related complications were higher in patients with ES (72.6%) than in those without ES (40.7%), (*p*≤0.0001). Recurrent strokes (*p*=0.0174), pulmonary embolism (*p*=0.0059), pneumonia (*p*≤0.0001), urinary tract infection (*p*≤0.0001), and sepsis (*p*=0.0002) were more common in patients with ES. Moreover, the patients with ES were more likely to have tracheostomy tube placement (*p*=0.0056), gastrostomy tube placement (*p*=0.0142), bed sores (*p*=0.0013), and brain edema (*p*=0.0104). Patients with ES were more likely to be more severely disabled (mRS 3–5) at discharge (*p*=0.0055) or to die in hospital [6 (11.8%) vs. 28 (4.6%); (*p*≤0.0001)] (Table 3). View this table: [Table 3](http://nsj.org.sa/content/27/2/104/T3) Table 3 - Length of stay, stroke-related complications, and outcomes in patients with and without early seizure (ES). View this table: [Table 4](http://nsj.org.sa/content/27/2/104/T4) Table 4 - Direct and inverse associations of early seizures after multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that greater severity of stroke (OR 1.064; 95% CI: 1.023–1.107) and confusion at presentation (OR 2.405; 95% CI: 1.067–5.421) were independent risk factors for ES and that unilateral weakness at presentation (OR 0.434; 95% CI: 0.223–0.845) was inversely related to ES. ## Discussion Our study found an incidence of 7.7% for ES after stroke. Most of the patients had seizures within first day of incident stroke. Age had no significant effect on the incidence of ES, however, in our cohort female gender was associated with higher risk of ES. Hemorrhagic strokes were associated with higher risk of ES in our cohort, whereas patients who had stroke due to small vessel disease were less likely to develop ES. Patients with more severe strokes were more likely to have ES. Patients who developed early seizures were more likely to have stroke related complications and longer length of hospital stay. The ES were associated with poorer outcome at discharge. The PPS incidence rates vary widely, ranging from 2% to 33%,2 although most of the published data suggests rates between 3% to 7%.10,11 A meta-analysis involving more than 100,000 stroke patients has reported an incidence rate of 7%,10 whereas a more recent analysis involving ischemic stroke patients only has reported an incidence rate of 3.3%.1 Our study included both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients, and ES after stroke was seen in 7.7% of our cohort. Most of these patients had a seizure within the first 24 h of stroke onset. When we grouped our patients according to age (<60 years and >60 years), we found that age did not affect the ES incidence. Meanwhile, previous data have not shown a consistent correlation between ES and gender. A few studies and a meta-analysis have shown that PSS incidence did not differ in relation to gender.2,11 A multicenter study on the other hand found that female gender is associated with PSS,12 and a different study showed a male predominance of seizure recurrence in patients with PSS.13 We found that the female gender is associated with a higher risk of ES after stroke. A recent study found female gender, and younger age as risk factors for refractory post-stroke epilepsy.14 There is no clear explanation of why females can have higher risk of ES after stroke or more refractory PSS, however, previous findings suggest that women have poorer outcomes after stroke than men due to differences in sex hormone, coagulation profile, and social and lifestyle factors.15 This needs to be further studied in larger studies to understand the relationship of gender to poststroke ES and PSS. One of the possible explanation of higher ES in women in our cohort, is our small sample size, where women represented less than a third of the patients. Timing of presentation from stroke onset and vascular risk factors did not differ between the patients with and without ES in our cohort, consistent with the published data.2,4 One study has found that a history of atrial fibrillation is a predictor of PSS recurrence.13 Data on the initial presentation of stroke and the risk of PSS are limited. We found that confusion and loss of consciousness at presentation are associated with ES, and this finding may be explained by cortical involvement or by increased severity of stroke. A recent study involving continuous electroecenphalogram (cEEG) monitoring has reported an incidence rate of 12% for non-convulsive status epilepticus in patients with neurological deterioration after stroke and an incidence rate of 44% for epileptic activities in stroke patients who underwent EEG recording due to deteriorating level of consciousness.16 Patients who present with confusion or altered level of consciousness were likely to experience epileptic activity at the onset of stroke. One interesting finding regarding clinical presentation is the inverse relationship between unilateral focal weakness or numbness and ES. In our cohort, the patients who presented with unilateral weakness were less likely to experience ES after stroke. Another study has found an inverse relationship between motor weakness and PSS.12 Although there is no clear explanation for this finding, more strokes due to small vessel disease or lacunar strokes are possibly associated with focal weakness or numbness without showing cortical symptoms and signs. No difference was found between the first or recurrent stroke and the risk of ES in our cohort. Patients with hemorrhagic strokes are more likely to experience ES after stroke compared with ischemic stroke patients,3,6,11 which is concordant with our findings. In our cohort, ES was more common in hemorrhagic stroke patients. A few studies have found an inverse relationship between ES and small vessel disease,3,5 whereas other studies did not find any difference in ES incidence in relation to ischemic stroke subtype.4 We also found an inverse relationship between small vessel disease and ES incidence. Cortical localization of stroke and hemorrhagic conversion of stroke have also been found to be predictors of ES after stroke;5,11 however, we did not investigate these radiological features in our population. Stroke severity has consistently been found to be a predictor of PSS.2,5-6,11 We also found higher stroke severity at presentation to be associated with increased risk of ES. Patients who had an NIHSS score of >5 at presentation were more likely to experience ES than those with a lower NIHSS score. The days immediately following a stroke are considered crucial, as most complications that occur on these days often result in worse clinical outcomes. The incidence rates of stroke-related complications were higher in ES patients than in those without ES, consistent with previous literature.17 Nearly three-fourths of our patients experienced some kind of stroke-related complications, of which the most significant were pneumonia, urinary tract infection, sepsis, and pulmonary embolism. Recurrent stroke was also more common in patients who had ES. Patients with ES were more likely to undergo tracheostomy tube placement and gastrostomy tube placement and to develop bed sores. Moreover, patients with ES were more likely to require ICU admission and to have longer length of hospital stay compared with those without ES. Outcomes of stroke patients after an ES have been reported in a number of studies. Although some earlier studies have reported no association between ES and disability or mortality,2,18-19 most of the recent studies and meta-analyses have suggested poorer outcomes in patients with ES.4,12,20-22 In our cohort, those with ES had higher morbidity and mortality, were more likely to be disabled, had more than twice the risk of in-hospital mortality, and were less likely to be discharged home than those without ES. Our study has certain limitations, including its retrospective design and the lack of continuous EEG monitoring within the first 24 h. The incidence of ES could have been underestimated, as some ES might have gone unrecognized due to the lack of detailed documentation of patient status and continuous EEG monitoring, especially within the first 24 h. Another limitation is the small size of our cohort, which may limit the strength of the results. Some data on outcomes were unavailable in the records. Additionally, we did not follow the patients longitudinally; hence, long-term outcomes could not be determined. Our study is a single-center hospital-based investigation, which reduces the generalizability of the results. ### Conclusion The ES after stroke were common in our cohort. Higher stroke severity and presentation with confusion were independent risk factors for ES after stroke. A negative association was observed between focal weakness at presentation and ES after stroke. The ES after stroke was associated with higher in-hospital complications, longer ICU stay, and worse outcomes at discharge. In the future, with the use of the identified predictive factors, patients at higher risk of ES may serve as candidates for randomized intervention trials for ES prevention, as well as PSS. ## Acknowledgement *We would like to thank Scribendi Inc. Chatham, Ontario N7M 0N3, Canada for English language editing.* * Received December 28, 2021. * Accepted April 14, 2022. * Copyright: © Neurosciences Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. ## References 1. 1.Wang JZ, Vyas MV, Saposnik G, Burneo JG. Incidence and management of seizures after ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2017; 89: 1220–1228. 2. 2.Alberti A, Paciaroni M, Caso V, Venti M, Palmerini F, Agnelli G. Early seizures in patients with acute stroke: frequency, predictive factors, and effect on clinical outcome. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008; 4: 715–720. [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18827922&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 3. 3.Szaflarski JP, Rackley AY, Kleindorfer DO, Khoury J, Woo D, Miller R, et al. Incidence of seizures in the acute phase of stroke: a population-based study. Epilepsia 2008; 49: 974–981. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01513.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18248443&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) [Web of Science](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000256492700006&link_type=ISI) 4. 4.Bryndziar T, Sedova P, Kramer NM, Mandrekar J, Mikulik R, Brown RD Jr., et al. Seizures following ischemic stroke: frequency of occurrence and impact on outcome in a long-term population-based study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25: 150–156. 5. 5.Procaccianti G, Zaniboni A, Rondelli F, Crisci, M, Sacquegna T. Seizures in acute stroke: incidence, risk factors and prognosis. Neuroepidemiology 2012; 39: 45–50. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000338374&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22777596&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 6. 6.Xu MY. Poststroke seizure: optimising its management. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2018; 4: 48–56. 7. 7.Silverman IE, Restrepo L, Mathews GC. Poststroke seizures. Arch Neurol 2002; 59: 195–201. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archneur.59.2.195&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11843689&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) [Web of Science](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000173799900002&link_type=ISI) 8. 8.Altman K, Shavit-Stein E, Maggio N. Post stroke seizures and epilepsy: from proteases to maladaptive plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci 2019; 13: 397. 9. 9.Adams HP Jr., Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993; 24: 35–41. 10. 10.Zou S, Wu X, Zhu B, Yu J, Yang B, Shi J. The pooled incidence of post-stroke seizure in 102 008 patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 2015; 22: 460–467. [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 11. 11.Zhang C, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang JG, Hu W, Ge M, et al. Risk factors for post-stroke seizures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 2014; 108: 1806–1816. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.09.030&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25454500&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 12. 12.Huang CW, Saposnik G, Fang J, Steven DA, Burneo JG. Huang CW. Influence of seizures on stroke outcomes: a large multicenter study. Neurology 2014 Mar 4; 82: 768–76. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/WNL.0000000000000166&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24489133&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 13. 13.Kim HJ, Park KD, Choi KG, Lee HW. Clinical predictors of seizure recurrence after the first post-ischemic stroke seizure. BMC Neurol 2016; 16: 212. 14. 14.Burneo JG, Antaya TC, Allen BN, Belisle A, Shariff SZ, Saposnik G. The risk of new-onset epilepsy and refractory epilepsy in older adult stroke survivors. Neurology 2019; 93: e568–e577. 15. 15.Hiraga A. Gender differences and stroke outcomes. Neuroepidemiology 2017; 48: 61–62. 16. 16.Scoppettuolo P, Gaspard N, Depondt C, Legros B, Ligot N, Naeije G. Epileptic activity in neurological deterioration after ischemic stroke, a continuous EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130: 2282–2286. 17. 17.Pezzini A, Grassi M, Del Zotto E, Giossi A, Volonghi I, Costa P, et al. Complications of acute stroke and the occurrence of early seizures. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 35: 444–450. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000348704&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23735811&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 18. 18.Labovitz DL, Hauser WA, Sacco RL. Prevalence and predictors of early seizure and status epilepticus after first stroke. Neurology 2001; 57: 200–206. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/WNL.57.2.200&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11468303&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 19. 19.Reith J, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Seizures in acute stroke: predictors and prognostic significance: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1997; 28: 1585–1589. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjI4LzgvMTU4NSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjE4OiIvbnNqLzI3LzIvMTA0LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 20. 20.Goswami RP, Karmakar PS, Ghosh A. Early seizures in first-ever acute stroke patients in India: incidence, predictive factors and impact on early outcome. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19: 1361–1366. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03782.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22680974&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom) 21. 21.Xu T, Ou S, Liu X, Yu X, Yuan J, Huang H, et al. Association between seizures after ischemic stroke and stroke outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e4117. 22. 22.Burneo JG, Fang J, Saposnik G; Investigators of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Impact of seizures on morbidity and mortality after stroke: a Canadian multi-centre cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: 52–58. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03051.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19686350&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F27%2F2%2F104.atom)