ABSTRACT
Objectives: To identify the genetic landscape of CMT in Saudi Arabia.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 43 patients diagnosed with CMT between 2016 and 2022 at National Guard Health Affairs hospitals in three cities. All CMT cases with a genetic diagnosis were included.
Results: Genetic testing was conducted in 23 out of 43 CMT cases (53%), and clinically relevant genetic variants associated with CMT were identified in 17 of 23 patients (73.9%). The most common genes in the cohort were MTMR2, PMP22, and FGD4, with notable intra-tribe mutations suggesting a strong influence of consanguinity. The predominant mode of inheritance was autosomal recessive CMT1, affecting 12 out of 17 cases (70.6%). Five novel variants associated with CMT were identified in MTMR2, PRX, SBF1, and HSPB8.
Conclusion: This study reveals a distinct genetic profile of CMT in the Saudi population, with a higher prevalence of autosomal recessive forms of the disease compared to other populations. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating genetic testing into routine clinical practice, particularly in populations with high consanguinity rates.
Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is a set of inherited neurological disorders associated with progressive distal muscle atrophy, foot deformities, and sensory loss.1 Prevalence studies estimate that CMT affects 17.7 per 100,000 individuals.2 Traditionally, CMT has been primarily classified using clinical and neurophysiological criteria into 2 major types; demyelinating CMT (CMT1), with a Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity (MNCV) value of < 38 m/s, and axonal CMT (CMT2), with an MNCV value of >38 m/s.3
CMT is further subclassified by the mode of inheritance and genetic cause. For example, the demyelinating type is sub-classified into CMT1A, inherited as autosomal-dominant, and CMT4, inherited as autosomal-recessive.1 While clinical features remain important for disease classification, molecular genetic features can enable more precise disease reclassifications.4 Nevertheless, many patients with clinical features of CMT are not genetically diagnosed with the disease due to unidentified genetic mutations or genomic rearrangements. Currently, more than 100 genes are linked to CMT,5 and this number might grow as next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches are integrated into clinical practice,6,7 and as more diverse populations are studied.
In well-studied populations, particularly those of European descent, the majority of CMT cases are attributed to pathogenic variants in four key genes: PMP22 (CMT1A), GJB1 (CMTX1), MPZ (CMT1B), and MFN2 (CMT2A). These common subtypes are typically inherited in a dominant manner and account for the majority of CMT cases in these populations.1 However, the genetic profile of CMT can vary across populations with different social and genetic backgrounds. For example, in populations with a history of consanguinity, the recessive form of CMT is prevalent.8–10 Additionally, in certain populations, rare genes account for the majority of CMT cases.11,12
Identifying the genetic profile of CMT from different populations, especially those that are less studied, is essential for improving healthcare outcomes. Understanding the genetic variations that cause CMT enables faster and more accurate diagnosis, as well as providing informed genetic counseling for affected families. This is especially important in populations with high rates of consanguinity, where recessive genetic disorders are more common.11 Although multiple studies have investigated the genetic profile of CMT in various populations,10,12–14 the genetic profile of CMT in the Saudi population, which has a high rate of consanguinity,15 remains unexplored. Therefore, this work aims to determine the genetic profile of CMT in Saudi patients, addressing a significant gap in current understanding of the disease’s genetic profile in this region.
Methods
Ethical approval
This study received the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (IRB/1636/22).
Sample size and study design
This is a retrospective cohort study performed at National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA) hospitals in three cities: Riyadh, Jeddah, and Alahsa. We enrolled all patients who were diagnosed with CMT disease in NGHA from the three cities from 2016 to 2022, with no restrictions on age and genders. Patients without genetic testing were excluded. In cases with multiple affected family members, only the first index case was included. Written informed consent was obtained from the research subjects.
Data collection
Medical records for all recruited CMT patients were collected following the IRB approval. Collected data included patients’ age, gender, the presenting complaint, orthopedic complications, developmental milestones, consanguinity status, family history, and DNA sequencing results.
Variant interpretation
Genetic variant interpretation was conducted in alignment with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines.16 All reported pathogenic mutations detected in our cohort were confirmed using the ClinVar database17 (accessed on September 2, 2024). Allele frequencies for novel variants were checked using the GnomAD database.18 In silico analyses of variants were investigated using Splice AI (spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org), Varsom,19 (GeneBe,20 and Mobidetails.21
Results
Between 2016 and 2022, a total of 43 Saudi patients were diagnosed with CMT. Of these, 23 (48%) underwent molecular genetic testing to identify the potential underlying genetic cause. Clinically relevant genetic variants related to CMT were identified in 19 cases; however, 2 cases were excluded as they were siblings for other subjects in the cohort with the same variant. Therefore, our cohort consisted of 17 out of 23 (73.9%) unrelated subjects with clinically relevant genetic variants linked to CMT (Figure 1).
- Number of cases with genetic testing.
Among these 17 cases, 10 (58.9%) were female and 7 (41%) were male, with a mean age of onset of 8 years. In addition, 10 patients (58.9%) presented symptoms in their first decade of life, 5 patients (29.4%) in their second decade, and 1 patient (5.9%) in the third decade. Notably, 9 of these 17 cases (52.9%) reported a positive family history of CMT (Table 1).
- Demographics.
The diagnostic tests used were a targeted gene panel in 8 cases, exome sequencing (ES) in 7 cases, comparative genomic hybridization microarray (CGH array) in 1 case, and targeted gene sequencing in 1 case. The 9 genes associated with CMT in our cohort were MTMR2 (4 cases), PMP22 (3 cases), FGD4 (3 cases), PRX (2 cases), SBF1 (1 case), SH3TC2 (1 case), NDRG1 (1 case), MFN2 (1 case), and HSPB8 (1 case) (Table 2). Most cases were of the autosomal recessive CMT1 subtype (12 out of 17; 70.6%), with 5 of these cases reporting a positive family history of CMT, likely indicating recurrent mutations within the family. Furthermore, consanguineous marriages were reported in 75% (9 out of 12) of patients with autosomal recessive CMT1, which likely reflects the high consanguinity rates within the Saudi population. Autosomal dominant inheritance was identified in 5 out of 17 cases (29.4%), with 3 cases diagnosed with autosomal dominant CMT1 subtype caused by PMP22 duplication, and 2 cases diagnosed with autosomal dominant CMT2 subtype (Table 2).
- Identified genetic variants in CMT patients.
For autosomal dominant CMT1, all 3 patients exhibited PMP22 duplications, and presented with classic CMT1 phenotypes, and reported positive family history. For autosomal recessive CMT1, 6 genes were reported. Four patients had variants in the MTMR2 gene, 2 were homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.1736_1745delinsCC p.(Tyr579SerfsTer22), one was homozygous for the pathogenic variants c.826 G>T p.(Glu276Ter) and c.1593+1 G>A, and one was homozygous for the intronic variant c.357+1del, which had not been previously reported in the ClinVar database. Three patients had variants in FGD4, with 2 homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.1740C>A p.(Tyr580Ter), and one homozygous for c.1471C>T p.(Arg491Trp) variant, which had not been previously reported in the ClinVar database. Two patients had mutations in the PRX gene, one homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.3098del p.(Thr1033MetfsTer6), and one homozygous for the variants c.586del p.(Arg196GlufsTer117) which has not been previously reported in ClinVar database (accessed on September 2, 2024). One patient had a compound heterozygous variant in the SBF1 gene, the c.5583+1G>A and the c.4631dupG, which were inherited from the paternal and maternal sides, respectively. Neither of these 2 variants had been previously reported in ClinVar. One patient was homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.383T>G p.(Leu128Ter) in the SH3TC2 gene, and one was homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.721C>T p.(Arg241Ter) in the NDRG1 gene. For autosomal dominant CMT2, 2 genes were identified. One patient was heterozygous for the pathogenic variant c.310C>T p.(Arg104Trp) in the MFN2, and another was heterozygous for c.421A>C p.(Lys141Gln) in the HSPB8 gene, which is reported in ClinVar as a variant of unknown significance (VUS) (Table 2).
Discussion
We retrospectively reviewed all CMT cases admitted to NGHA hospitals, in Riyadh, Jeddah, and Alahsa between 2016 and 2022 to reveal the underlying genetic causes of the disease. In our cohort, only 23 out of 43 (53%) of the CMT cases underwent genetic testing. Relevant genetic variants to CMT were identified in 19 out of 23 (82%) of tested cases, underscoring its clinical utility. However, the proportion of patients in our cohort who received a genetic diagnosis, 19 out of 43 (44%), is lower than the 76% to 63% rates reported in previous studies.(6,22)
Prior studies highlight PMP22, GJB1, MFN2, and MPZ as major causative genes for CMT in other populations.1 However, in our cohort, the predominant genes were MTMR2, PMP22, and FGD4, with no cases linked to MPZ and only one to GJB1, excluded due to incomplete medical records. Although the number of cases is limited, this lack of similarity with other studies in causative genes suggests that the genetic architecture of CMT in the Saudi population differs from that observed in other populations, highlighting both the genetic heterogeneity of CMT and notable inter-population variations.
In contrast to worldwide data where the most common mode of CMT inheritance is autosomal dominant, our findings highlight the high prevalence of autosomal recessive CMT, with no clear predominance of a single CMT subtype. This pattern aligns with observations from other regions with high consanguinity rates, where autosomal-recessive forms of CMT—encompassing multiple genetic subtypes—account for a larger proportion of cases, and correlates with the high consanguinity rates reported in the Saudi population.8,15 Moreover, despite the fact of scarce specific epidemiological data in Saudi Arabia, the genetic implication of consanguineous marriages is evident by the tendency towards a more severe phenotype in patients with autosomal recessive CMT among our cohort. Autosomal recessive inheritance is common across several inherited neurological disorders in regions with high consanguinity, such as Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries. This pattern is seen in autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy,23 and certain metabolic neuropathies,24 which occur at higher relative frequencies compared to Western cohorts. In contrast, global data show a predominance of autosomal dominant inheritance for CMT.1 The high incidence of positive family history in 53% of cases further stresses the importance of genetic diagnosis for providing informed counseling to affected families. In addition, we noticed a stratification effect through intra-tribe marriages as 2 out of 4 patients with MTMR2 variants have the c.1736_1745delinsCC p.(Tyr579SerfsTer22), and 2 out of 3 patients with FGD4 variants having the c.1740C>A p.(Tyr580Ter) are related to the same tribe.25 Given these insights, we strongly recommend integrating genetic testing into the standard diagnostic workflow for CMT to enhance the identification of causative genes, particularly in regions with high rates of consanguinity and intra-tribe marriages. By revealing these genes, healthcare providers can offer more targeted genetic counseling and risk assessment to families, helping them make informed decisions about family planning and managing the potential risks associated with consanguineous unions. Furthermore, as advances in precision medicine and gene therapy continue to evolve, the identification of CMT genes relevant to the local population enables personalized treatment strategies.10,26–28 These advances hold the potential not only to improve the quality of life for individuals affected by CMT but also to reduce the incidence of the disease in future generations through early interventions.
In this study, we report 5 novel variants in clinically diagnosed CMT patients. The NM_016156.6: c.357+1del in the MTMR2 gene variant was identified as a homozygous variant in a patient with severe distal muscle wasting and atrophy in both upper as well as lower limbs, flexion contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joints, foot drop with a high-steppage gait, hypotonia, and absent reflexes, while superficial touch and deep pain sensations remained intact. The patient’s symptoms began at the age of 11 years. The variant is a null variant affecting the splice donor site at a conserved nucleotide. It was absent from control chromosomes within the GnomAD database,18 and had not been reported in ClinVar.17 In silico prediction suggests a potential impact on splicing, which may contribute to the disease phenotype. Given the available evidence, this variant is classified as likely pathogenic. The NM_001370298.3:c.1471C>T p.(Arg491Trp) in the FGD4 gene was identified as a homozygous variant using WES in a patient with a classical CMT1 phenotype developed at 6 years old, accompanied by kyphoscoliosis, bilateral hip dysplasia, and delayed motor development. Positive family history was reported in this case; however, segregation analysis was not performed due to the lack of genetic material from other family members. The variant is a missense variant that alters arginine, a positively charged amino acid, with tryptophan, a hydrophobic amino acid at codon 491. It is observed in the GnomAD database,18 at a frequency of 3.7×10-6 with no homozygous event. Multiple in silico tools predicted a pathogenic effect of this variant. As of September 2, 2024, there was only one submission in ClinVar (Variation ID: 2122304) for a variant affecting the same codon with different amino acid change p.(Arg491Leu). Given the available evidence, this variant is classified as a VUS. The NM_181882.3:c.586del p.(Arg196GlufsTer117) in the PRX gene was detected as a homozygous variant using WES in a patient with severe pes cavus, stiff movements, scoliosis, and MRI findings revealing spina bifida at the S1 vertebral level. The patient’s symptoms began at the age of 9 years. The variant is a frameshift deletion, leading to the alteration of codon 196 of the PRX gene. This variant was not present in control chromosomes within the GnomAD database,18 and had not been reported in ClinVar.17 However, a nonsense mutation at the same position (Arg196) has previously been identified in a patient with CMT and has been classified as pathogenic in ClinVar.29,30 Given the available evidence, the variant is classified as pathogenic. The NM_002972.4:c.5583+1G>A and c.4631dup p.(Arg1545ProfsTer10) in the SBF1 gene were detected as compound heterozygous, each inherited from a different parent. The variants were detected using WES in a patient with microcephaly, and significant gross motor developmental delay, with MRI findings indicating multifocal abnormalities in the brainstem and conus medullaris. The patient’s symptoms began in the first year of life. Neither variant had been reported in ClinVar. The c.5583+1G>A is an intronic variant affecting a splice donor site. The variant is observed in the GnomAD database at a frequency of 1.85×10-6 with no homozygous event. Multiple in silico tools predicted a negative effect on splicing and a pathogenic impact. The c.4631dup is an insertion of one nucleotide resulting in a frameshift mutation. This variant is not present in control chromosomes within the GnomAD database. Given the available evidence, the variant is classified as likely pathogenic. The NM_014365.3:c.421A>C p.(Lys141Gln) in HSPB8 is detected as a heterozygous variant using WES in a patient with classical autosomal dominant CMT2 phenotype. The patient’s symptoms began at the age of 12 years. This is a missense variant that replaces lysine, a positively charged amino acid, with glutamine a neutral amino acid. This variant is not present in control chromosomes within the GnomAD database. Multiple in silico tools predicted a damaging effect on the protein. Variants that disrupt the p.Lys141 amino acid residue in HSPB8 have been observed in affected individuals,31,32 and alternative variants affecting the same codon are reported in ClinVar as pathogenic (421A>G p.K141E (VCV000002618.30), c.423G>T p.(K141N) (VCV000002619.5), and 423G>C p.(K141N) (VCV000002617.3). Given available evidence, the variant is classified as likely pathogenic.
Globally, reported prevalence for CMT varies widely, with the highest estimates in Northern Europe (~31/100,000) and the lowest in Asia (~11/100,000).2 There is a lack of epidemiological studies on CMT in Saudi Arabia and other Arabian Gulf countries. This gap limits our ability to directly compare national or regional prevalence with other parts of the world. This study is constrained by its relatively small sample size, encompassing patients from only three regions of the country between 2016 and 2022, coinciding with the adoption of electronic medical records. Furthermore, 52% of CMT cases were diagnosed based solely on clinical symptoms without genetic confirmation, indicating a significant gap in our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of CMT in nearly half of the cases. In addition, most of the included cases (13 out of the 17) are from the Riyadh hospital, which serves as a national referral center, and has a higher rate of genetic testing. As a result, geographical prevalence and regional subtype distributions cannot be inferred. Future research should aim to include a larger sample size across more hospitals and capture the region of origin to better elucidate the genetic landscape and the utility of genetic testing in CMT, as well as to determine regional subtype distribution of the disease. Additionally, extending genetic testing to all clinically diagnosed cases could uncover further causative genes and clarify the sub-classification of CMT, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic strategies.
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients, referring physicians, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at NGHA, and the data unit at KAIMRC for their significant contributions in facilitating this work. Also, We would like to thank Cambridge Proofreading & Editing LLC (www.proofreading.org) for English language editing.
Footnotes
Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.
- Received April 10, 2025.
- Accepted October 12, 2025.
- Copyright: © Neurosciences
Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.







