Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurosciences Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Neurosciences Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Articles
Open Access

Genetic profile of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in the Saudi population: A retrospective study highlighting the role of consanguinity

Aiman S. Alhazmi, Areej A. Alhareeri, Ali S. Alhawas, Essam W. Jameel, Faisal S. Aleisa, Muteb M. Alqahtani, Mutrik J. Almughni and Mohammed A. Almuqbil
Neurosciences Journal October 2025, 30 (4) 304-311; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2021.4.20250058
Aiman S. Alhazmi
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aiman S. Alhazmi
  • For correspondence: hazmias{at}ksau-hs.edu.sa
Areej A. Alhareeri
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali S. Alhawas
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Essam W. Jameel
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faisal S. Aleisa
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muteb M. Alqahtani
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mutrik J. Almughni
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed A. Almuqbil
From the College of Science and Health Professions (Alhazmi), College of Applied Medical Sciences (Alhareeri), from the College of Medicine (Alhawas, Jameel, Aleisa, Alqahtani, Almughni, Almuqbil), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (Alhazmi, Alhareeri, Almuqbil), King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To identify the genetic landscape of CMT in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 43 patients diagnosed with CMT between 2016 and 2022 at National Guard Health Affairs hospitals in three cities. All CMT cases with a genetic diagnosis were included.

Results: Genetic testing was conducted in 23 out of 43 CMT cases (53%), and clinically relevant genetic variants associated with CMT were identified in 17 of 23 patients (73.9%). The most common genes in the cohort were MTMR2, PMP22, and FGD4, with notable intra-tribe mutations suggesting a strong influence of consanguinity. The predominant mode of inheritance was autosomal recessive CMT1, affecting 12 out of 17 cases (70.6%). Five novel variants associated with CMT were identified in MTMR2, PRX, SBF1, and HSPB8.

Conclusion: This study reveals a distinct genetic profile of CMT in the Saudi population, with a higher prevalence of autosomal recessive forms of the disease compared to other populations. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating genetic testing into routine clinical practice, particularly in populations with high consanguinity rates.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is a set of inherited neurological disorders associated with progressive distal muscle atrophy, foot deformities, and sensory loss.1 Prevalence studies estimate that CMT affects 17.7 per 100,000 individuals.2 Traditionally, CMT has been primarily classified using clinical and neurophysiological criteria into 2 major types; demyelinating CMT (CMT1), with a Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity (MNCV) value of < 38 m/s, and axonal CMT (CMT2), with an MNCV value of >38 m/s.3

CMT is further subclassified by the mode of inheritance and genetic cause. For example, the demyelinating type is sub-classified into CMT1A, inherited as autosomal-dominant, and CMT4, inherited as autosomal-recessive.1 While clinical features remain important for disease classification, molecular genetic features can enable more precise disease reclassifications.4 Nevertheless, many patients with clinical features of CMT are not genetically diagnosed with the disease due to unidentified genetic mutations or genomic rearrangements. Currently, more than 100 genes are linked to CMT,5 and this number might grow as next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches are integrated into clinical practice,6,7 and as more diverse populations are studied.

In well-studied populations, particularly those of European descent, the majority of CMT cases are attributed to pathogenic variants in four key genes: PMP22 (CMT1A), GJB1 (CMTX1), MPZ (CMT1B), and MFN2 (CMT2A). These common subtypes are typically inherited in a dominant manner and account for the majority of CMT cases in these populations.1 However, the genetic profile of CMT can vary across populations with different social and genetic backgrounds. For example, in populations with a history of consanguinity, the recessive form of CMT is prevalent.8–10 Additionally, in certain populations, rare genes account for the majority of CMT cases.11,12

Identifying the genetic profile of CMT from different populations, especially those that are less studied, is essential for improving healthcare outcomes. Understanding the genetic variations that cause CMT enables faster and more accurate diagnosis, as well as providing informed genetic counseling for affected families. This is especially important in populations with high rates of consanguinity, where recessive genetic disorders are more common.11 Although multiple studies have investigated the genetic profile of CMT in various populations,10,12–14 the genetic profile of CMT in the Saudi population, which has a high rate of consanguinity,15 remains unexplored. Therefore, this work aims to determine the genetic profile of CMT in Saudi patients, addressing a significant gap in current understanding of the disease’s genetic profile in this region.

Methods

Ethical approval

This study received the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (IRB/1636/22).

Sample size and study design

This is a retrospective cohort study performed at National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA) hospitals in three cities: Riyadh, Jeddah, and Alahsa. We enrolled all patients who were diagnosed with CMT disease in NGHA from the three cities from 2016 to 2022, with no restrictions on age and genders. Patients without genetic testing were excluded. In cases with multiple affected family members, only the first index case was included. Written informed consent was obtained from the research subjects.

Data collection

Medical records for all recruited CMT patients were collected following the IRB approval. Collected data included patients’ age, gender, the presenting complaint, orthopedic complications, developmental milestones, consanguinity status, family history, and DNA sequencing results.

Variant interpretation

Genetic variant interpretation was conducted in alignment with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines.16 All reported pathogenic mutations detected in our cohort were confirmed using the ClinVar database17 (accessed on September 2, 2024). Allele frequencies for novel variants were checked using the GnomAD database.18 In silico analyses of variants were investigated using Splice AI (spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org), Varsom,19 (GeneBe,20 and Mobidetails.21

Results

Between 2016 and 2022, a total of 43 Saudi patients were diagnosed with CMT. Of these, 23 (48%) underwent molecular genetic testing to identify the potential underlying genetic cause. Clinically relevant genetic variants related to CMT were identified in 19 cases; however, 2 cases were excluded as they were siblings for other subjects in the cohort with the same variant. Therefore, our cohort consisted of 17 out of 23 (73.9%) unrelated subjects with clinically relevant genetic variants linked to CMT (Figure 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

- Number of cases with genetic testing.

Among these 17 cases, 10 (58.9%) were female and 7 (41%) were male, with a mean age of onset of 8 years. In addition, 10 patients (58.9%) presented symptoms in their first decade of life, 5 patients (29.4%) in their second decade, and 1 patient (5.9%) in the third decade. Notably, 9 of these 17 cases (52.9%) reported a positive family history of CMT (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

- Demographics.

The diagnostic tests used were a targeted gene panel in 8 cases, exome sequencing (ES) in 7 cases, comparative genomic hybridization microarray (CGH array) in 1 case, and targeted gene sequencing in 1 case. The 9 genes associated with CMT in our cohort were MTMR2 (4 cases), PMP22 (3 cases), FGD4 (3 cases), PRX (2 cases), SBF1 (1 case), SH3TC2 (1 case), NDRG1 (1 case), MFN2 (1 case), and HSPB8 (1 case) (Table 2). Most cases were of the autosomal recessive CMT1 subtype (12 out of 17; 70.6%), with 5 of these cases reporting a positive family history of CMT, likely indicating recurrent mutations within the family. Furthermore, consanguineous marriages were reported in 75% (9 out of 12) of patients with autosomal recessive CMT1, which likely reflects the high consanguinity rates within the Saudi population. Autosomal dominant inheritance was identified in 5 out of 17 cases (29.4%), with 3 cases diagnosed with autosomal dominant CMT1 subtype caused by PMP22 duplication, and 2 cases diagnosed with autosomal dominant CMT2 subtype (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

- Identified genetic variants in CMT patients.

For autosomal dominant CMT1, all 3 patients exhibited PMP22 duplications, and presented with classic CMT1 phenotypes, and reported positive family history. For autosomal recessive CMT1, 6 genes were reported. Four patients had variants in the MTMR2 gene, 2 were homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.1736_1745delinsCC p.(Tyr579SerfsTer22), one was homozygous for the pathogenic variants c.826 G>T p.(Glu276Ter) and c.1593+1 G>A, and one was homozygous for the intronic variant c.357+1del, which had not been previously reported in the ClinVar database. Three patients had variants in FGD4, with 2 homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.1740C>A p.(Tyr580Ter), and one homozygous for c.1471C>T p.(Arg491Trp) variant, which had not been previously reported in the ClinVar database. Two patients had mutations in the PRX gene, one homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.3098del p.(Thr1033MetfsTer6), and one homozygous for the variants c.586del p.(Arg196GlufsTer117) which has not been previously reported in ClinVar database (accessed on September 2, 2024). One patient had a compound heterozygous variant in the SBF1 gene, the c.5583+1G>A and the c.4631dupG, which were inherited from the paternal and maternal sides, respectively. Neither of these 2 variants had been previously reported in ClinVar. One patient was homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.383T>G p.(Leu128Ter) in the SH3TC2 gene, and one was homozygous for the pathogenic variant c.721C>T p.(Arg241Ter) in the NDRG1 gene. For autosomal dominant CMT2, 2 genes were identified. One patient was heterozygous for the pathogenic variant c.310C>T p.(Arg104Trp) in the MFN2, and another was heterozygous for c.421A>C p.(Lys141Gln) in the HSPB8 gene, which is reported in ClinVar as a variant of unknown significance (VUS) (Table 2).

Discussion

We retrospectively reviewed all CMT cases admitted to NGHA hospitals, in Riyadh, Jeddah, and Alahsa between 2016 and 2022 to reveal the underlying genetic causes of the disease. In our cohort, only 23 out of 43 (53%) of the CMT cases underwent genetic testing. Relevant genetic variants to CMT were identified in 19 out of 23 (82%) of tested cases, underscoring its clinical utility. However, the proportion of patients in our cohort who received a genetic diagnosis, 19 out of 43 (44%), is lower than the 76% to 63% rates reported in previous studies.(6,22)

Prior studies highlight PMP22, GJB1, MFN2, and MPZ as major causative genes for CMT in other populations.1 However, in our cohort, the predominant genes were MTMR2, PMP22, and FGD4, with no cases linked to MPZ and only one to GJB1, excluded due to incomplete medical records. Although the number of cases is limited, this lack of similarity with other studies in causative genes suggests that the genetic architecture of CMT in the Saudi population differs from that observed in other populations, highlighting both the genetic heterogeneity of CMT and notable inter-population variations.

In contrast to worldwide data where the most common mode of CMT inheritance is autosomal dominant, our findings highlight the high prevalence of autosomal recessive CMT, with no clear predominance of a single CMT subtype. This pattern aligns with observations from other regions with high consanguinity rates, where autosomal-recessive forms of CMT—encompassing multiple genetic subtypes—account for a larger proportion of cases, and correlates with the high consanguinity rates reported in the Saudi population.8,15 Moreover, despite the fact of scarce specific epidemiological data in Saudi Arabia, the genetic implication of consanguineous marriages is evident by the tendency towards a more severe phenotype in patients with autosomal recessive CMT among our cohort. Autosomal recessive inheritance is common across several inherited neurological disorders in regions with high consanguinity, such as Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries. This pattern is seen in autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy,23 and certain metabolic neuropathies,24 which occur at higher relative frequencies compared to Western cohorts. In contrast, global data show a predominance of autosomal dominant inheritance for CMT.1 The high incidence of positive family history in 53% of cases further stresses the importance of genetic diagnosis for providing informed counseling to affected families. In addition, we noticed a stratification effect through intra-tribe marriages as 2 out of 4 patients with MTMR2 variants have the c.1736_1745delinsCC p.(Tyr579SerfsTer22), and 2 out of 3 patients with FGD4 variants having the c.1740C>A p.(Tyr580Ter) are related to the same tribe.25 Given these insights, we strongly recommend integrating genetic testing into the standard diagnostic workflow for CMT to enhance the identification of causative genes, particularly in regions with high rates of consanguinity and intra-tribe marriages. By revealing these genes, healthcare providers can offer more targeted genetic counseling and risk assessment to families, helping them make informed decisions about family planning and managing the potential risks associated with consanguineous unions. Furthermore, as advances in precision medicine and gene therapy continue to evolve, the identification of CMT genes relevant to the local population enables personalized treatment strategies.10,26–28 These advances hold the potential not only to improve the quality of life for individuals affected by CMT but also to reduce the incidence of the disease in future generations through early interventions.

In this study, we report 5 novel variants in clinically diagnosed CMT patients. The NM_016156.6: c.357+1del in the MTMR2 gene variant was identified as a homozygous variant in a patient with severe distal muscle wasting and atrophy in both upper as well as lower limbs, flexion contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joints, foot drop with a high-steppage gait, hypotonia, and absent reflexes, while superficial touch and deep pain sensations remained intact. The patient’s symptoms began at the age of 11 years. The variant is a null variant affecting the splice donor site at a conserved nucleotide. It was absent from control chromosomes within the GnomAD database,18 and had not been reported in ClinVar.17 In silico prediction suggests a potential impact on splicing, which may contribute to the disease phenotype. Given the available evidence, this variant is classified as likely pathogenic. The NM_001370298.3:c.1471C>T p.(Arg491Trp) in the FGD4 gene was identified as a homozygous variant using WES in a patient with a classical CMT1 phenotype developed at 6 years old, accompanied by kyphoscoliosis, bilateral hip dysplasia, and delayed motor development. Positive family history was reported in this case; however, segregation analysis was not performed due to the lack of genetic material from other family members. The variant is a missense variant that alters arginine, a positively charged amino acid, with tryptophan, a hydrophobic amino acid at codon 491. It is observed in the GnomAD database,18 at a frequency of 3.7×10-6 with no homozygous event. Multiple in silico tools predicted a pathogenic effect of this variant. As of September 2, 2024, there was only one submission in ClinVar (Variation ID: 2122304) for a variant affecting the same codon with different amino acid change p.(Arg491Leu). Given the available evidence, this variant is classified as a VUS. The NM_181882.3:c.586del p.(Arg196GlufsTer117) in the PRX gene was detected as a homozygous variant using WES in a patient with severe pes cavus, stiff movements, scoliosis, and MRI findings revealing spina bifida at the S1 vertebral level. The patient’s symptoms began at the age of 9 years. The variant is a frameshift deletion, leading to the alteration of codon 196 of the PRX gene. This variant was not present in control chromosomes within the GnomAD database,18 and had not been reported in ClinVar.17 However, a nonsense mutation at the same position (Arg196) has previously been identified in a patient with CMT and has been classified as pathogenic in ClinVar.29,30 Given the available evidence, the variant is classified as pathogenic. The NM_002972.4:c.5583+1G>A and c.4631dup p.(Arg1545ProfsTer10) in the SBF1 gene were detected as compound heterozygous, each inherited from a different parent. The variants were detected using WES in a patient with microcephaly, and significant gross motor developmental delay, with MRI findings indicating multifocal abnormalities in the brainstem and conus medullaris. The patient’s symptoms began in the first year of life. Neither variant had been reported in ClinVar. The c.5583+1G>A is an intronic variant affecting a splice donor site. The variant is observed in the GnomAD database at a frequency of 1.85×10-6 with no homozygous event. Multiple in silico tools predicted a negative effect on splicing and a pathogenic impact. The c.4631dup is an insertion of one nucleotide resulting in a frameshift mutation. This variant is not present in control chromosomes within the GnomAD database. Given the available evidence, the variant is classified as likely pathogenic. The NM_014365.3:c.421A>C p.(Lys141Gln) in HSPB8 is detected as a heterozygous variant using WES in a patient with classical autosomal dominant CMT2 phenotype. The patient’s symptoms began at the age of 12 years. This is a missense variant that replaces lysine, a positively charged amino acid, with glutamine a neutral amino acid. This variant is not present in control chromosomes within the GnomAD database. Multiple in silico tools predicted a damaging effect on the protein. Variants that disrupt the p.Lys141 amino acid residue in HSPB8 have been observed in affected individuals,31,32 and alternative variants affecting the same codon are reported in ClinVar as pathogenic (421A>G p.K141E (VCV000002618.30), c.423G>T p.(K141N) (VCV000002619.5), and 423G>C p.(K141N) (VCV000002617.3). Given available evidence, the variant is classified as likely pathogenic.

Globally, reported prevalence for CMT varies widely, with the highest estimates in Northern Europe (~31/100,000) and the lowest in Asia (~11/100,000).2 There is a lack of epidemiological studies on CMT in Saudi Arabia and other Arabian Gulf countries. This gap limits our ability to directly compare national or regional prevalence with other parts of the world. This study is constrained by its relatively small sample size, encompassing patients from only three regions of the country between 2016 and 2022, coinciding with the adoption of electronic medical records. Furthermore, 52% of CMT cases were diagnosed based solely on clinical symptoms without genetic confirmation, indicating a significant gap in our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of CMT in nearly half of the cases. In addition, most of the included cases (13 out of the 17) are from the Riyadh hospital, which serves as a national referral center, and has a higher rate of genetic testing. As a result, geographical prevalence and regional subtype distributions cannot be inferred. Future research should aim to include a larger sample size across more hospitals and capture the region of origin to better elucidate the genetic landscape and the utility of genetic testing in CMT, as well as to determine regional subtype distribution of the disease. Additionally, extending genetic testing to all clinically diagnosed cases could uncover further causative genes and clarify the sub-classification of CMT, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic strategies.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients, referring physicians, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at NGHA, and the data unit at KAIMRC for their significant contributions in facilitating this work. Also, We would like to thank Cambridge Proofreading & Editing LLC (www.proofreading.org) for English language editing.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

  • Received April 10, 2025.
  • Accepted October 12, 2025.
  • Copyright: © Neurosciences

Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rudnik-Schöneborn S,
    2. Auer-Grumbach M,
    3. Senderek J
    . Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and hereditary motor neuropathies – Update 2020. Med Genetik 2020; 32: 207-219.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ma M,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Dai S,
    4. Chu M,
    5. Sun L,
    6. Liu L, et al.
    A meta-analysis on the prevalence of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related inherited peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol 2023; 270: 2468-2482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sivera Mascaró R,
    2. García Sobrino T,
    3. Horga Hernández A,
    4. Pelayo Negro AL,
    5. Alonso Jiménez A,
    6. Antelo Pose A, et al.
    Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease [English Edition]. Neurologia (Engl Ed) 2025; 40: 290-305.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Estévez-Arias B,
    2. Carrera-García L,
    3. Nascimento A,
    4. Cantarero L,
    5. Hoenicka J,
    6. Palau F
    . Genetic approaches and pathogenic pathways in the clinical management of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Transl Genet Genom 2022; 6: 333-352.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Zhong M,
    2. Luo Q,
    3. Ye T,
    4. Zhu X,
    5. Chen X,
    6. Liu J
    . Identification of Candidate Genes Associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease by Network and Pathway Analysis. BioMed Res Int 2020; 2020: 1353516.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Record CJ,
    2. Pipis M,
    3. Skorupinska M,
    4. Blake J,
    5. Poh R,
    6. Polke JM, et al.
    Whole genome sequencing increases the diagnostic rate in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Brain 2024; 147: 3144-3156.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Runheim H,
    2. Pettersson M,
    3. Hammarsjö A,
    4. Nordgren A,
    5. Henriksson M,
    6. Lindstrand A, et al.
    The cost-effectiveness of whole genome sequencing in neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 6904.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Candayan A,
    2. Parman Y,
    3. Battaloğlu E
    . Clinical and Genetic Survey for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Based on the Findings in Turkey, a Country with a High Rate of Consanguineous Marriages. Balkan Med J 2022; 39: 3-11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Ahmed AN,
    2. Rawlins LE,
    3. Khan N,
    4. Jan Z,
    5. Ubeyratna N,
    6. Voutsina N, et al.
    Expanding the genetic spectrum of hereditary motor sensory neuropathies in Pakistan. BMC Neurol 2024; 24: 394.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Taghizadeh S,
    2. Vazehan R,
    3. Beheshtian M,
    4. Sadeghinia F,
    5. Fattahi Z,
    6. Mohseni M, et al.
    Molecular Diagnosis of Hereditary Neuropathies by Whole Exome Sequencing and Expanding the Phenotype Spectrum. Arch Iran Med 2020; 23: 426-433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Alshamlani LK,
    2. Alsulaim DS,
    3. Alabbad RS,
    4. Alhoshan AA,
    5. Alkhoder JF,
    6. Alsaleh NS, et al.
    Consanguinity and Occurrence of Monogenic Diseases in a Single Tertiary Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A 2 Years Cross-Sectional Study. Appl Clin Genet 2024; 17: 151-158.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pisciotta C,
    2. Shy ME
    . Hereditary neuropathy. Handb Clin Neurol 2023; 195: 609-617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. Ouyang ZY,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Qin DQ,
    4. Cen ZD,
    5. Zheng XS,
    6. Xie F, et al.
    Genetic profile of Chinese patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020; 133: 2633-2634.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sharma S,
    2. Govindaraj P,
    3. Chickabasaviah YT,
    4. Siram R,
    5. Shroti A,
    6. Seshagiri DV, et al.
    Genetic Spectrum of Inherited Neuropathies in India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2022; 25: 407-416.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Khayat AM,
    2. Alshareef BG,
    3. Alharbi SF,
    4. AlZahrani MM,
    5. Alshangity BA,
    6. Tashkandi NF
    . Consanguineous Marriage and Its Association With Genetic Disorders in Saudi Arabia: A Review. Cureus 2024; 16: e53888.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Richards S,
    2. Aziz N,
    3. Bale S,
    4. Bick D,
    5. Das S,
    6. Gastier-Foster J, et al
    ; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17: 405-424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Landrum MJ,
    2. Lee JM,
    3. Riley GR,
    4. Jang W,
    5. Rubinstein WS,
    6. Church DM, et al.
    ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42: D980-D985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Karczewski KJ,
    2. Francioli LC,
    3. Tiao G,
    4. Cummings BB,
    5. Alföldi J,
    6. Wang Q, et al
    ; Genome Aggregation Database Consortium. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020; 581: 434-443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kopanos C,
    2. Tsiolkas V,
    3. Kouris A,
    4. Chapple CE,
    5. Albarca Aguilera M,
    6. Meyer R, et al.
    VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics 2019; 35: 1978-1980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Stawiński P,
    2. Płoski R
    . Genebe.net: implementation and validation of an automatic ACMG variant pathogenicity criteria assignment. Clin Genet 2024; 106: 119-126.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Baux D,
    2. Van Goethem C,
    3. Ardouin O,
    4. Guignard T,
    5. Bergougnoux A,
    6. Koenig M, et al.
    MobiDetails: online DNA variants interpretation. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29(2): 356-360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    1. Padilha JP,
    2. Brasil CS,
    3. Hoefel AM,
    4. Winckler PB,
    5. Donis KC,
    6. Brusius-Facchin AC, et al.
    Diagnostic yield of targeted sequential and massive panel approaches for inherited neuropathies. Clin Genet 2020; 98: 185-190.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Al Jumah M,
    2. Al Rajeh S,
    3. Eyaid W,
    4. Al-Jedai A,
    5. Al Mudaiheem H,
    6. Al Shehri A, et al.
    Spinal muscular atrophy carrier frequency in Saudi Arabia. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2022; 10: e2049.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Bamaga AK,
    2. Alyazidi AS,
    3. Alali FK
    . A Brief Review of Inherited Neuropathies: A Perspective from Saudi Arabia. Brain Sci 2025; 15: 403.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Mineta K,
    2. Goto K,
    3. Gojobori T,
    4. Alkuraya FS
    . Population structure of indigenous inhabitants of Arabia. PLoS Genet 2021; 17: e1009210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Dong H,
    2. Qin B,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Lei L,
    5. Wu S
    . Current Treatment Methods for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Diseases. Biomolecules 2024; 14: 1138.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.
    1. Georgiou E,
    2. Kagiava A,
    3. Sargiannidou I,
    4. Schiza N,
    5. Stavrou M,
    6. Richter J, et al.
    AAV9-mediated SH3TC2 gene replacement therapy targeted to Schwann cells for the treatment of CMT4C. Mol Ther 2023; 31: 3290-3307.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Pisciotta C,
    2. Pareyson D
    . Gene therapy and other novel treatment approaches for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuromuscul Disord 2023; 33: 627-635.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Guilbot A,
    2. Williams A,
    3. Ravisé N,
    4. Verny C,
    5. Brice A,
    6. Sherman DL, et al.
    A mutation in periaxin is responsible for CMT4F, an autosomal recessive form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10: 415-421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Renouil M,
    2. Stojkovic T,
    3. Jacquemont ML,
    4. Lauret K,
    5. Boué P,
    6. Fourmaintraux A, et al.
    Maladie de Charcot-Marie-Tooth associée au gène de la périaxine (CMT4F) : description clinique, électrophysiologique et génétique de 24 patients. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2013; 169: 603-612.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Irobi J,
    2. Van Impe K,
    3. Seeman P,
    4. Jordanova A,
    5. Dierick I,
    6. Verpoorten N, et al.
    Hot-spot residue in small heat-shock protein 22 causes distal motor neuropathy. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 597-601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Irobi J,
    2. Almeida-Souza L,
    3. Asselbergh B,
    4. De Winter V,
    5. Goethals S,
    6. Dierick I, et al.
    Mutant HSPB8 causes motor neuron-specific neurite degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19: 3254-3265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Neurosciences Journal: 30 (4)
Neurosciences Journal
Vol. 30, Issue 4
1 Oct 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Neurosciences Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic profile of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in the Saudi population: A retrospective study highlighting the role of consanguinity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Neurosciences Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Neurosciences Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Genetic profile of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in the Saudi population: A retrospective study highlighting the role of consanguinity
Aiman S. Alhazmi, Areej A. Alhareeri, Ali S. Alhawas, Essam W. Jameel, Faisal S. Aleisa, Muteb M. Alqahtani, Mutrik J. Almughni, Mohammed A. Almuqbil
Neurosciences Journal Oct 2025, 30 (4) 304-311; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2021.4.20250058

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Genetic profile of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in the Saudi population: A retrospective study highlighting the role of consanguinity
Aiman S. Alhazmi, Areej A. Alhareeri, Ali S. Alhawas, Essam W. Jameel, Faisal S. Aleisa, Muteb M. Alqahtani, Mutrik J. Almughni, Mohammed A. Almuqbil
Neurosciences Journal Oct 2025, 30 (4) 304-311; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2021.4.20250058
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of Qihuang needle therapy combined with flunarizine hydrochloride for vertigo in vestibular migraine
  • An observational study on the clinical profile, management approaches, and outcomes of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit for status epilepticus
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • home

More Information

  • Help

Additional journals

  • All Topics

Other Services

  • About

© 2025 Neurosciences Journal Neurosciences is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3183. Print ISSN 1319-6138.

Powered by HighWire