- Quality assessment of included studies using Newcastle Ottawa Scale(NOS).
NO. | Source (Author/Year/Country) | Newcastle Ottawa scale assessment(NOS) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Quality Score | |||||||
Is the case definition adequate? | Representativ-eness of the cases | Selection of Controls | Definition of Controls | Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis | Ascertainm-ent of exposure | Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | Non-Resp-onse rate | |||
1 | Boulenoir et al 2020, France | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
2 | Che et al 2020, China | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
3 | Huang et al 2018, China | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
4 | Tanaka et al 2020, Japan | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
5 | Li et al 2019, China | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
6 | Li et al 2021, China | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
7 | Liu et al 2021, China | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
8 | Mori et al 2012, Japan | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
9 | Yu et al 2020, United Kingdom | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
10 | Seners et al 2021, France | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
11 | Seners et al 2014, France | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
12 | Seners et al.2017.France | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
13 | Shah et al 2022, USA | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
14 | Simonsen et al 2016, Denmark | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
15 | Wang et al 2022, China | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |
16 | Cui et al 2022, China | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good |