Abstract
The sympathetic system has been a target for interventional treatment since the early half of the 20th century. One area targeted for treatment has been the lumbar sympathetics for lower limb pain. Physicians have treated various neuropathic and ischemic conditions employing the use of sympathetic procedures as a mode of treatment, yet the studies strongly supporting the utility of the procedure have been lacking. Anatomic studies have brought to light the complexity and variation that exists with identifying the locations of the ganglion. Studies have investigated the different methods to determine the highest yield and less risky approaches in performing the technique. Many studies have reported positive results with blockade and neurolysis, but review of the literature reveals poor strength quality and small sample population. These reports should be viewed as building blocks for more robust investigation. Interpretation of the results should be performed with caution, and translation into common practice implemented on a case by case basis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yi X, AuBuchon J, Zeltwanger S, Kirby JP. Necrotic arachnidism and intractable pain from recluse spider bites treated with lumbar sympathetic block: a case report and review of literature. Clin J Pain. 2011;27:457–60.
Cheng J, Daftari A, Zhou L. Sympathetic blocks provided sustained pain relief in a patient with refractory painful diabetic neuropathy. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2012;2012:1–5.
Gebauer A, Schultz CR, Giangarra CE. Chronic exercise-induced leg pain in an athlete successfully treated with sympathetic block. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1575–8.
Datta S, Pai U. Paradiscal extraforaminal technique for lumbar sympathetic block: report of a proposed new technique utilizing a cadaver study. Pain Physician. 2004;7:53–7.
Rocco AG, Palombi D, Raeke D. Anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic chain. Reg Anesth. 1995;20:13–9.
Umeda S, Arai T, Hatano Y, Mori K, Hoshino K. Cadaver anatomic analysis of the best site for chemical lumbar sympathectomy. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:643–6.
Kirvelä O, Svedström E, Lundbom N. Ultrasonic guidance of lumbar sympathetic and celiac plexus block: a new technique. Reg Anesth. 1992;17:43–6.
König CW, Schott UG, Pereira PL, et al. MR-guided lumbar sympathicolysis. Eur Radiol. 2002;6:1388–93.
Schmid MR, Kissling RO, Curt A, Jaschko G, Hodler J. Sympathetic skin response: monitoring of CT-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks. Radiology. 2006;241:595–602.
Rocco AG. Radiofrequency lumbar sympatholysis: the evolution of a technique managing sympathetically mediated pain. Reg Anesth. 1995;20:3–12.
Wallace G. A lateral approach for lumbar sympathetic nerve block. Anesthesiology. 1955;16:254–60.
Clark AJ, Houlton PG, Purkis IE, Shukla RC. Lumbar-sympathetic blockade. is a single-needle technique adequate? Clin J Pain. 1988;4:213–6.
Hong JH, Oh MJ. Comparison of multilevel with single level injection during lumbar sympathetic ganglion block: efficacy of sympatholysis and incidence of psoas muscle injection. Korean J Pain. 2010;23:131–6.
Ohno K, Oshita S. Transdiscal lumbar sympathetic block: a new technique for a chemical sympathectomy. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1312–6.
Price DD, Long S, Wilsey B, Rafii A. Analysis of peak magnitude and duration of analgesia produced by local anesthetics injected into sympathetic ganglia of complex regional pain syndrome patients. Clin J Pain. 1998;14:216–26.
Jackson TP, Gaeta R. Neurolytic blocks revisited. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2008;12:7–13.
Carroll I, Clark JD, Mackey S. Sympathetic block with botulinum toxin to treat complex regional pain syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:348–51.
Chen LC, Wong CS, Huh BK, et al. Repeated lumbar sympathetic blockade with lidocaine and clonidine attenuates pain in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 patients–a report of 2 cases. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2006;44:113–7.
Bonica JJ, Buckley FP. Regional analgesia with local anesthetics. In: Bonica JJ, editor. The management of pain. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1990. p. 1883–966.
van Eijs F, Stanton-Hicks M, Van Zundert J, et al. Evidence-based interventional pain medicine according to clinical diagnoses. 16. Complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Pract. 2011;11:70–87.
Bogduk N. Diagnostic nerve blocks in chronic pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002;16:565–78.
Haynsworth RF, Noe CE. Percutaneous lumbar sympathectomy: a comparison of radiofrequency denervation versus phenol neurolysis. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:459–63.
Noe CE, Haynsworth RF. Lumbar radiofrequency sympatholysis. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:801–6.
Manjunath PS, Jayalakshmi TS, Dureja GP, Prevost AT. Management of lower limb complex regional pain syndrome type 1: an evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal lumbar sympathectomy versus phenol lumbar sympathetic neurolysis—a pilot study. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:647–9.
Verma YS, Thakur JR, Sodhi SS. Evaluation of chemical lumbar sympathectomy for chronic arterial ischaemia of lower limb(s). J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2007;23:391–4.
Straube S, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Cervico-thoracic or lumbar sympathectomy for neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;7:1–15.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
R. Abramov declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abramov, R. Lumbar Sympathetic Treatment in the Management of Lower Limb Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 18, 403 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-014-0403-x
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-014-0403-x