Pathophysiology and Definitions of Seizures and Status Epilepticus

Electrographic seizures are common among critically ill children, and have been associated with worse outcomes. Despite their often-widespread cortical representation, most of these seizures remain subclinical, a phenomenon which remains poorly understood. We compared the brain network properties of clinical versus subclinical seizures to gain insight into their relative potential deleterious effects.

Functional connectivity (phase lag index) and graph measures (global efficiency and clustering coefficients) were computed for 2178 electrographic seizures recorded during 48-hours of 19-channel continuous EEG monitoring obtained in 20 comatose children. Frequency-specific group differences in clinical versus subclinical seizures were analyzed using a non-parametric ANCOVA, adjusting for age, sex, medication exposure, treatment intensity and seizures per subject.

Clinical seizures demonstrated greater functional connectivity than subclinical seizures at alpha frequencies, but less connectivity than subclinical seizures at delta frequencies. Clinical seizures also demonstrated significantly higher median global efficiency than subclinical seizures (p < 0.01), and significantly higher median clustering coefficients across all electrodes at alpha frequencies.

Clinical expression of seizures correlates with greater alpha synchronization of distributed brain networks.

The stronger global and local alpha-mediated functional connectivity observed during clinical seizures may indicate greater pathological network recruitment. These observations motivate further studies to investigate whether the clinical expression of seizures may influence their potential to cause secondary brain injury.

This chapter is a brief overview of the approach to the care of adults presenting to urgent care with emergencies requiring rapid recognition, stabilization, and disposition.

Status epilepticus is a neurologic and medical emergency manifested by prolonged seizure activity or multiple seizures without return to baseline. It is associated with substantial medical cost, morbidity, and mortality. There is a spectrum of severity dependent on the type of seizure, underlying pathology, comorbidities, and appropriate and timely medical management. This chapter discusses the evolving definitions of status epilepticus and multiple patient and clinical factors which influence outcome. The pathophysiology of status epilepticus is reviewed to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms which contribute to status epilepticus, as well as the potential long-term effects. The clinical presentations of different types of status epilepticus in adults are discussed, with emphasis on the hospital course and management of the most dangerous type, generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Strategies for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus are provided based on available evidence from clinical trials and recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Federation of Neurological Societies.

We have reviewed the scant literature on status epilepticus in patients with brain tumours. Patients with brain tumour-associated epilepsy (TAE) appear less likely to develop status epilepticus (TASE) than patients with epilepsy in the general population (EGP) are to develop status epilepticus (SEGP). TASE is associated with lesions in similar locations as TAE; in particular, the frontal lobes. However, in contrast to TAE, where seizures commence early in the course of the disease or at presentation, TASE is more likely to occur later in the disease course and herald tumour progression. In marked contrast to TAE, where epilepsy risk is inversely proportional to Word Health Organization tumour grade, TASE risk appears to be directly proportional to tumour grade (high grade gliomas appear singularly predisposed). Whilst anti-epileptic drug (AED) resistance is more common in TAE than EGP (with resistance directly proportional to tumour grade and frontal location), TASE appears paradoxically more responsive to simple AED regimes than either TAE or SEGP. Although some results suggest that mortality may be higher with TASE than with SEGP, it is likely that (as with SEGP) the major determinant of mortality is the underlying disease process. Because all such data have been derived from retrospective studies, because TASE and SEGP are less common than TAE and EGP, and because TASE and SEGP classification has often been inconsistent, findings can only be considered preliminary: multi-centre, prospective studies are required. Whilst preliminary, our review suggests that TASE has a distinct clinical profile compared to TAE and SEGP.