Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 14, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages 372-378
Epilepsy & Behavior

Association of antiepileptic drug nonadherence with risk of seizures in adults with epilepsy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.12.006Get rights and content

Abstract

This study evaluated the potential effect of antiepileptic drug (AED) nonadherence on the risk of subsequent seizure. Retrospective insurance claims from the United States were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were: age 21–64 years, diagnosis of epilepsy or nonfebrile convulsions, ⩾2 AED prescriptions, and insurance enrollment for ⩾6 months pre- and ⩾60 days post-AED initiation. Seizure was defined as a hospital or emergency admission associated with epilepsy or nonfebrile convulsions. Observation began 7 days post-drug initiation, ending with the first of the following: seizure, insurance disenrollment, or 365 days post-drug initiation. Adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR), with MPR <0.8 defining nonadherence. Seizure risk was assessed using an extended Cox proportional hazards model. Of 18,073 subjects identified, 2467 (14%) had ⩾1 seizure. Mean follow-up was 133 days among subjects with event and 305 days for patients without event. Seizure risk was 21% higher among nonadherers (hazard ratio = 1.205, P = 0.0002) than adherers.

Introduction

Epilepsy carries heightened morbidity and increased risk of mortality compared with the general population [1], [2], [3]. Lack of seizure control is believed to be a primary driver in the underlying increased morbidity and mortality in this population [4]. Uncontrolled seizures have been associated with physical injuries such as fractures, head injuries, and burns; psychosocial comorbid conditions, such as depression and anxiety; reduced quality of life; and sudden death in epilepsy [5], [6]. Prolonged seizures also can lead to neuronal death and cognitive impairment.

There are many disease-based and treatment-related factors that can contribute to poor seizure control among patients with epilepsy, including age at disease onset, seizure etiology, seizure type, epilepsy syndrome, comorbid conditions, and nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Because nonadherence may be a modifiable factor in seizure control, there has been research to understand its role. An early study found that 31% of seizures may be attributable to medication nonadherence [7]. Jones and colleagues [8] showed a correlation between nonadherence and increased seizure frequency, and an earlier study [9] suggested that 45% of patients reported a seizure after missing a dose of medication.

Medication nonadherence, particularly when associated with increased seizures, can further amplify the morbidity and mortality associated with epilepsy. Nonadherence can be evaluated in a variety of ways, including electronic monitoring caps, patterns of prescription refills observed from pharmacy claims data, and patient-reported survey data. As a result, estimates of medication nonadherence in epilepsy have ranged broadly from approximately 30% to 60% [8], [10], [11], [12]. In a recent claims database study, AED nonadherence was estimated at 39% and associated with increased emergency department visits and hospitalizations, as well as increased total health care costs in adults with epilepsy [13]. In another recent study conducted in Medicaid enrollees with epilepsy, nonadherence was associated with a greater than threefold increased risk of mortality compared with adherence [14].

Previous literature has signaled an association between nonadherence and poor seizure control. However, this association has not been widely investigated using large-scale observational data from real-world practice settings nor approached from a temporal perspective. To address these research gaps, we conducted a retrospective observational study to measure the temporal association between nonadherence to AEDs and the risk of seizure in a large cohort of adult patients diagnosed with epilepsy. Knowledge of this relationship is valuable in aiding clinicians in identifying time periods of patient nonadherence and risk of seizures when managing patients with epilepsy.

Section snippets

Data source

Data were analyzed from the PharMetrics Patient Centric Database, a national database of longitudinal pharmacy and medical claims from private health care benefit plans covering more than 40 million patients enrolled in more than 70 health plans across the United States. The data spanned the period January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2005. The database contained demographic information, resource utilization (inpatient, outpatient, emergency department), reimbursed dollar amount for any claim,

Results

Table 1 presents descriptive statistics on various background characteristics for the study sample. The mean age of the 18,073 subjects who met all study inclusion criteria was approximately 42 years. Patients 46–64 years of age represented the largest age group (46% of all patients), and more than half (59%) of all subjects were female. Overall, a mean of 1.45 AEDs (SD = 0.77) were taken, with older AEDs more commonly used (62% of all AED prescriptions filled) than newer AEDs (38% of all AED

Discussion

Our study, a large-scale observational assessment from a real-world setting, observed a striking relationship between nonadherence and the risk of seizure. We found the risk of seizure to be 21% higher in nonadherent patients within 1 year of AED initiation, after controlling for various demographic and clinical characteristics. We also found a precipitous decline in adherence during the study period: adherence fell to less than 50% of patients remaining adherent at the end of the 12-month

Ethical approval

All authors confirm that they have read the journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Role of the funding source

This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Ranjani Manjunath is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline. Mr. Davis and Mr. Candrilli are employees of RTI Health Solutions, which has received funding from GlaxoSmithKline to conduct this research study. Alan B. Ettinger has received funding for this research study in the form of consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline.

Contributors

Ms. Manjunath had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis; Ms. Manjunath also assisted in development of the study design, interpretation of analysis results, and preparation of the article. Keith L. Davis and Sean D. Candrilli assisted in developing the study design, performed all statistical analyses, assisted in interpretation of all analysis results, and assisted in preparation of the article.

References (29)

  • T.S. Walczak et al.

    Incidence and risk factors in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a prospective cohort study

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • L. Stanaway et al.

    Non-compliance with anticonvulsant therapy as a cause of seizures

    NZ Med J

    (1985)
  • W.E. Rosenfeld et al.

    Patient compliance with topiramate vs. other antiepileptic drugs: a claims database analysis [abstract]

    Epilepsia

    (2004)
  • I.E. Leppik

    How to get patients with epilepsy to take their medication: the problem of noncompliance

    Postgrad Med.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (0)

    Portions of this study were previously presented at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Epilepsy Society in Philadelphia, PA, USA, November 30 through December 4, 2007.

    View full text