Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 14, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 674-676
Epilepsy & Behavior

Brief Communication
High-dose oral prednisolone for infantile spasms: An effective and less expensive alternative to ACTH

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.01.023Get rights and content

Abstract

The ideal treatment of infantile spasms is unclear, but many studies advocate hormonal treatment. In the United States, intramuscular ACTH is most widely used, despite the problematic financial cost and side effect profile. Since September 2007, we have replaced ACTH with high-dose oral prednisolone (40–60 mg/day) according to the 2004 United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS). Ten of 15 (67%) infants with new-onset and previously treated infantile spasms became spasm free within 2 weeks; 4 later recurred. More children with an idiopathic etiology for infantile spasms were spasm free than were symptomatic cases (88% vs 43%, P = 0.10). Spasm freedom was equivalent to our most recent 15 infants receiving ACTH, with 13 (87%) responding, P = 0.16. Oral prednisolone had fewer adverse effects (53% vs 80%, P = 0.10) and was less expensive ($200 vs approximately $70,000) than ACTH. We now routinely recommend oral prednisolone to all families of children with infantile spasms.

Introduction

Infantile spasms (IS) is an epileptic encephalopathy with poor developmental outcomes. Unfortunately, since its original description in 1841 [1], there are limited well-studied therapies other than hormonal therapy and vigabatrin. In the United States, many physicians perceive ACTH as first-line therapy, as this was the only treatment in the 2004 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter classified as “probably” effective, with vigabatrin deemed only “possibly” effective [2]. At this time, vigabatrin is not currently licensed in the United States.

Vigabatrin is, however, available in many other countries, but in the UKISS study [3], hormonal therapy was successful in 73% of infants after 2 weeks compared with vigabatrin in 54%. These results were similar to another prospective comparison of these therapies from 1997 (74% vs 48%) [4]. Based on these and other studies, a recent Cochrane review [5] suggested hormonal treatment was better than vigabatrin in the short term.

The treatment of IS became even more problematic in the United States in August 2007 when the cost of H.P. ACTHar Gel (Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Union City, CA, USA) was increased from $1650 to $23,000 for a vial, with typically three vials required for a 1-month treatment course. Oral corticosteroids are a logical, less expensive alternative, but results for IS are conflicting. Two previous studies [6], [7] reported that oral corticosteroids were less effective (29–33% spasm-free incidence) and they therefore have not been recommended [2]. However, in the hormonal treatment arm of the UKISS study, oral prednisolone was equivalent to synthetic ACTH (70% vs 76% spasm freedom after 14 days, respectively) [3]. A higher dose of oral steroids was used in the UKISS study [3], nearly double the dose in the previous reports [6], [7]. We expected that oral prednisolone would be equivalent to published efficacy rates for ACTH and our center’s previous experience as well.

Section snippets

Methods

We have consistently used high-dose oral prednisolone in 15 consecutive infants with IS since September 2007. Families were counseled about all choices including topiramate [8], [9] and the ketogenic diet [10], but were informed they would need to obtain ACTH and vigabatrin at another institution if either of these therapies was chosen. In some cases, they were prescribed ACTH or vigabatrin at another institution. Those treatments were deferred and they were seen for a second opinion by our

Results

The median age of the 15 children treated with oral prednisolone was 6 months (range: 3–19 months). Patient demographics are provided in Table 1. Eight had new-onset IS, with the other 7 having failed therapies including topiramate, levetiracetam, and the ketogenic diet. Those with idiopathic etiology for IS were slightly more likely to become spasm free (7/8, 88%) compared with 3 of 7 (43%) with symptomatic etiologies (P = 0.10). There was no influence of age, gender, or duration of spasms prior

Discussion

Despite the unfortunate financial impetus for finding steroid alternatives, our center’s experience over the past 18 months using oral prednisolone showed equivalence to our ACTH experience and supported results from the UKISS study [3]. There are distinct advantages to using oral prednisolone over ACTH. An insurance preapproval potentially requiring days to complete is not typically necessary with prednisolone, which is widely available in most pharmacies. Painful intramuscular injections are

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Adam Hartman was supported by a Neurological Sciences Academic Development Award (K12NS001696). The authors gratefully acknowledge the email correspondence of Dr. John Osborne in helping guide our use of oral prednisolone.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (78)

  • Clinical profile, treatment modalities, and outcomes in patients with infantile spasms: A retrospective study from the United Arab of Emirates (UAE)

    2022, Epilepsy and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    None of our patients have received ACTH, probably due to a combination of factors such as lack of its availability, limited insurance coverage, and/or the absence of a well-trained epilepsy nurse to provide proper parental training for injections. In agreement with our results, several prospective studies have shown the efficacy of high-dose Prednisolone UKISS protocol as a feasible and less expensive alternative to ACTH [16,17,38,40]. Vigabatrin is considered the preferred 1st line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed IS in many institutes [30,41,42].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text