Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurosciences Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Neurosciences Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

Essentials of research methods in neurosurgery and allied sciences for research, appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part I)

Ignatius N. Esene, Amr M. El-Shehaby and Saleh S. Baeesa
Neurosciences Journal April 2016, 21 (2) 97-107; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.2.20150552
Ignatius N. Esene
From the Department of Neurosurgery (Esene, El-Shehaby), Ain Shams University, the Gamma Knife Center (Esene, El-Shehaby), Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt, and the Division of Neurosurgery (Baeesa), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amr M. El-Shehaby
From the Department of Neurosurgery (Esene, El-Shehaby), Ain Shams University, the Gamma Knife Center (Esene, El-Shehaby), Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt, and the Division of Neurosurgery (Baeesa), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saleh S. Baeesa
From the Department of Neurosurgery (Esene, El-Shehaby), Ain Shams University, the Gamma Knife Center (Esene, El-Shehaby), Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt, and the Division of Neurosurgery (Baeesa), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
MBChB, FRCSC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Vandenbroucke JP
    (1998) Observational research and evidence-based medicine: What should we teach young physicians? J Clin Epidemiol 51, 467–472.
  2. ↵
    1. Sandu N,
    2. Sadr-Eshkevari P,
    3. Schaller BJ
    (2011) Trigemino-Cardiac Reflex Examination Group (TCREG). Usefulness of case reports to improve medical knowledge regarding trigemino-cardiac reflex in skull base surgery. J Med Case Rep 5, 149.
  3. ↵
    1. Grimes DA,
    2. Schulz KF
    (2002) An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land. Lancet 359, 57–61.
  4. ↵
    1. Bhandari M,
    2. Joensson A
    (2009) Clinical Research for Surgeons (Thieme, Stuttgart (NY)).
  5. ↵
    1. Egger M,
    2. Smith GD,
    3. Sterne JA
    (2001) Uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Clin Med (Lond) 1, 478–484.
  6. ↵
    1. Esene IN,
    2. Ngu J,
    3. El Zoghby M,
    4. Solaroglu I,
    5. Sikod AM,
    6. Kotb A,
    7. et al.
    (2014) Case series and descriptive cohort studies in neurosurgery: the confusion and solution. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 1321–1332.
  7. ↵
    1. Esene IN,
    2. Kotb A,
    3. ElHusseiny H
    (2014) Five is the maximum sample size for case reports: statistical justification, epidemiologic rationale, and clinical importance. World Neurosurg 82, e659–e665.
    1. Ng TT,
    2. McGory ML,
    3. Ko CY,
    4. Maggard MA
    (2006) Meta-analysis in surgery: methods and limitations. Arch Surg 141, 1125–1131.
  8. ↵
    1. Klimo P Jr.,
    2. Thompson CJ,
    3. Ragel BT,
    4. Boop FA
    (2014) Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature. J Neurosurg 120, 796–810.
  9. ↵
    1. Haines SJ
    (1983) Randomized clinical trials in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 12, 259–264.
  10. ↵
    1. Schöller K,
    2. Licht S,
    3. Tonn JC,
    4. Uhl E
    (2009) Randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery--how good are we? A. cta Neurochir (Wien) 151, 519–527.
  11. ↵
    1. Esene IN,
    2. Kotb A,
    3. ElHusseiny H
    (2014) Five is the maximum sample size for case reports: statistical justification, epidemiologic rationale, and clinical importance. World Neurosurg 82, e659–e665.
  12. ↵
    1. Nesvick CL,
    2. Thompson CJ,
    3. Boop FA,
    4. Klimo P Jr.
    (2014) Case-control studies in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 121, 285–296.
  13. ↵
    1. Kiehna EN,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Pouratian N,
    4. Dumont AS
    (2011) Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 114, 280–285.
  14. ↵
    1. Glasser SP
    (2008) Essentials of Clinical Research (Springer, Alabama (USA)).
    1. Gorelick PB,
    2. Alter M
    (1994) Handbook of Neuroepidemiology (Dekker, New York (NY)).
    1. Rothman KJ,
    2. Greenland S,
    3. Lash TL
    (2008) Modern Epidemiology (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (PA)).
    1. Molgaard CA
    (1993) Neuroepidemiology: Theory & Method (Academic Press Inc, San Diego (Califonia)).
    1. Nelson LM,
    2. Tanner CM,
    3. Eeden SVD,
    4. McGuire VM
    (2003) Neuroepidemiology: From Principles to Practice (Oxford University Press, New York (NY)).
    1. Grobbee DE,
    2. Hoes AW
    (2009) Clinical Epidemiology Principles, Methods, and Applications for Clinical Research (Jones and Bartlett Publishers LLC, Ontario (Canada)).
    1. Zaletel-Kragelj L,
    2. Botikov J
    (2010) Methods and Tools in Public Health. A Handbook for Teachers, Researchers and Health Professionals (Hans Jacobs Publishing Company, Lage (Germany)).
    1. Bonita R,
    2. Beaglehole O,
    3. Kjellstrom T
    (2006) Basic Epidemiology (World Health Organization, Geneva (CH)), 2nd ed, Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43541/1/9241547073_eng.pdf.
    1. Haynes RB,
    2. Sackett DL,
    3. Guyatt GH,
    4. Tugwell P
    (1991) Clinical Epidemiology: How to Do Clinical Practice Research (Little, Brown and Company, Boston (MA)), 3rd ed.
  15. ↵
    1. Bland M
    (1995) An introduction to Medical Statistics (Oxford University Press, New York (NY)).
  16. ↵
    1. Fletcher RH,
    2. Fletcher SW
    (2005) Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (PA)), 4th ed.
    1. Gail MH,
    2. Benichou J
    (2000) Encyclopedia of Epidemiologic Methods (John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (NJ)).
  17. ↵
    1. Feigin VL,
    2. Bennett DA
    (2006) Handbook Of Clinical Neuroepidemiology (Nova Publishers, New York (NY)).
  18. ↵
    1. Winn HR
    1. Garton H,
    2. Barker FG II.,
    3. Haine SJ
    (2011) Neurosurgical Epidemiology and Outcomes Assessment. in Youmans Neurological Surgery, ed Winn HR (Elsevier Inc, Philadelphia (PA)), 6th ed, 183–202.
  19. ↵
    1. Gail MH,
    2. Benichou J
    (2000) Encyclopedia of Epidemiologic Methods (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (England)).
  20. ↵
    1. Hennekens CH,
    2. Buring JE,
    3. Mayrent SL
    (1987) Epidemiology in Medicine (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins).
  21. ↵
    1. Dekkers OM,
    2. Egger M,
    3. Altman DG,
    4. Vandenbroucke JP
    (2012) Distinguishing case series from cohort studies. Ann Intern Med 156, 37–40.
  22. ↵
    1. Grimes DA,
    2. Schulz KF
    (2002) Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. Lancet 359, 145–149.
  23. ↵
    1. Leucht S,
    2. Kissling W,
    3. Davis JM
    (2009) How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Acta Psychiatr Scand 119, 443–450.
  24. ↵
    1. Haines SJ,
    2. Walters BC
    (2006) Evidence-Based Neurosurgery: An Introduction (Thiemes Medical Publsihers Inc, New York (NY)).
  25. ↵
    1. Wupperman R,
    2. Davis R,
    3. Obremskey WT
    (2007) Level of evidence in Spine compared to other orthopedic journals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32, 388–393.
    1. Yarascavitch BA,
    2. Chuback JE,
    3. Almenawer SA,
    4. Reddy K,
    5. Bhandari M
    (2012) Levels of evidence in the neurosurgical literature: more tribulations than trials. Neurosurgery 71, 1131–1137.
  26. ↵
    1. Medina JM,
    2. McKeon PO,
    3. Hertel J
    (2006) Rating the Levels of Evidence in Sports-Medicine Research. Athletic Therapy Today 11, 38–41.
  27. ↵
    1. Burls A
    (2012) What is critical appraisal? (Hayward Medical Communications, Calgary (Alberta)).
  28. ↵
    1. Haines SJ
    (2003) Evidence-based neurosurgery Evidence-based neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 52, 36–47.
    1. Vandenbroucke JP
    (2009) STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? J Clin Epidemiol 62, 594–596.
  29. ↵
    1. Lo BW,
    2. Macdonald RL,
    3. Baker A,
    4. Levine MA
    (2013) Clinical outcome prediction in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using Bayesian neural networks with fuzzy logic inferences. Comput Math Methods Med 2013, 904860.
    1. Shamim MS,
    2. Enam SA,
    3. Qidwai U
    (2009) Fuzzy Logic in neurosurgery: predicting poor outcomes after lumbar disk surgery in 501 consecutive patients. Surg Neurol 72, 565–572, discussion 572.
  30. ↵
    1. Godil SS,
    2. Shamim MS,
    3. Enam SA,
    4. Qidwai U
    (2011) Fuzzy logic: A “simple” solution for complexities in neurosciences? Surg Neurol Int 2, 24.
  31. ↵
    1. Glaser AN
    (2005) High-Yield Biostatistics (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (PA)), 3rd ed.
  32. ↵
    1. Grant WB
    (1999) Dietary links to Alzheimer’s disease:1999 update. J Alzheimers Dis 1, 197–201.
  33. ↵
    1. Grant WB
    (2014) Trends in diet and Alzheimer’s disease during the nutrition transition in Japan and developing countries. J Alzheimers Dis 38, 611–620.
  34. ↵
    1. Petrie A
    (2013) Medical Statistics at a Glance Text and Workbook (Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey (NJ)).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Neurosciences Journal: 21 (2)
Neurosciences Journal
Vol. 21, Issue 2
1 Apr 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Neurosciences Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Essentials of research methods in neurosurgery and allied sciences for research, appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part I)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Neurosciences Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Neurosciences Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Essentials of research methods in neurosurgery and allied sciences for research, appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part I)
Ignatius N. Esene, Amr M. El-Shehaby, Saleh S. Baeesa
Neurosciences Journal Apr 2016, 21 (2) 97-107; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2016.2.20150552

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Essentials of research methods in neurosurgery and allied sciences for research, appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part I)
Ignatius N. Esene, Amr M. El-Shehaby, Saleh S. Baeesa
Neurosciences Journal Apr 2016, 21 (2) 97-107; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2016.2.20150552
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Structural and functional changes in the hippocampus induced by environmental exposures
  • Tumefactive demyelinating lesions: A literature review of recent findings
  • Epilepsia partialis continua: A review
Show more Review Article

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • home

More Information

  • Help

Additional journals

  • All Topics

Other Services

  • About

© 2025 Neurosciences Journal Neurosciences is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3183. Print ISSN 1319-6138.

Powered by HighWire