Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurosciences Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Neurosciences Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: approach and pitfalls

Mohammed H. Alanazy
Neurosciences Journal July 2017, 22 (3) 169-180; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2017.3.20160638
Mohammed H. Alanazy
From the Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Stevens JC
    (1997) AAEM minimonograph #26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve 20, 1477–1486.
  2. ↵
    1. Gelfman R,
    2. Melton LJ,
    3. Yawn BP,
    4. Wollan PC,
    5. Amadio PC,
    6. Stevens JC
    (2009) Long-term trends in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 72, 33–41.
  3. ↵
    1. Atroshi I,
    2. Gummesson C,
    3. Johnsson R,
    4. Ornstein E,
    5. Ranstam J,
    6. Rosén I
    (1999) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 282, 153–158.
  4. ↵
    1. Watson JC
    (2012) The electrodiagnostic approach to carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurol Clin 30, 457–478.
  5. ↵
    1. Nora DB,
    2. Becker J,
    3. Ehlers JA,
    4. Gomes I
    (2004) Clinical features of 1039 patients with neurophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107, 64–69.
  6. ↵
    1. Stewart JD
    (2003) Peripheral nerve fascicles: anatomy and clinical relevance. Muscle Nerve 28, 525–541.
  7. ↵
    1. Pham M,
    2. Bäumer P,
    3. Meinck H-M,
    4. Schiefer J,
    5. Weiler M,
    6. Bendszus M,
    7. et al.
    (2014) Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome: fascicular motor lesions of median nerve trunk. Neurology 82, 598–606.
  8. ↵
    1. Jablecki CK,
    2. Andary MT,
    3. Floeter MK,
    4. Miller RG,
    5. Quartly CA,
    6. Vennix MJ,
    7. et al.
    (2002) Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 58, 1589–1592.
  9. ↵
    1. Dorfman LJ,
    2. Robinson LR
    (1997) AAEM minimonograph #47: normative data in electrodiagnostic medicine. ff. Muscle Nerve 20, 4–14.
  10. ↵
    1. Werner RA,
    2. Andary M
    (2011) Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 44, 597–607.
  11. ↵
    1. Chen S,
    2. Andary M,
    3. Buschbacher R,
    4. Del Toro D,
    5. Smith B,
    6. So Y,
    7. et al.
    (2016) Electrodiagnostic reference values for upper and lower limb nerve conduction studies in adult populations. Muscle Nerve 54, 371–377.
  12. ↵
    1. Nathan PA,
    2. Keniston RC,
    3. Myers LD,
    4. Meadows KD
    (1992) Obesity as a risk factor for slowing of sensory conduction of the median nerve in industry. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study involving 429 workers. J Occup Med 34, 379–383.
    1. Werner RA,
    2. Franzblau A,
    3. Albers JW,
    4. Armstrong TJ
    (1997) Influence of body mass index and work activity on the prevalence of median mononeuropathy at the wrist. Occup Environ Med 54, 268–271.
  13. ↵
    1. Werner RA,
    2. Jacobson JA,
    3. Jamadar DA
    (2004) Influence of body mass index on median nerve function, carpal canal pressure, and cross-sectional area of the median nerve. Muscle Nerve 30, 481–485.
  14. ↵
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    (2013) Artifacts and Technical Factors. in Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders, eds Preston D, Shapiro B (Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia (PA)), 3rd ed, 70–89.
  15. ↵
    1. Burnham RS,
    2. Burnham TR
    (2009) Effect of hand warming on electrodiagnostic testing results and diagnosis in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90, 2062–2065.
  16. ↵
    1. Kumaraswamy L,
    2. Andary M,
    3. Bernaiche M,
    4. O'Connor R
    (2009) Effect of hand temperature on the electrodiagnotic study of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 40, 719.
  17. ↵
    1. Sandin KJ,
    2. Asch SM,
    3. Jablecki CK,
    4. Kilmer DD,
    5. Nuckols TK,
    6. Carpal Tunnel Quality Group
    (2010) Clinical quality measures for electrodiagnosis in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 41, 444–452.
  18. ↵
    1. Robinson LR,
    2. Micklesen PJ,
    3. Wang L
    (1998) Strategies for analyzing nerve conduction data: superiority of a summary index over single tests. Muscle Nerve 21, 1166–1171.
  19. ↵
    1. Cifu DX,
    2. Saleem S
    (1993) Median-radial latency difference: its use in screening for carpal tunnel syndrome in twenty patients with demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74, 44–47.
  20. ↵
    1. Uncini A,
    2. Di Muzio A,
    3. Awad J,
    4. Manente G,
    5. Tafuro M,
    6. Gambi D
    (1993) Sensitivity of three median-to-ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 16, 1366–1373.
  21. ↵
    1. Daube J,
    2. Stevens J
    (1993) Palmar stimulation in CTS [letter]. Muscle Nerve 16, 798.
  22. ↵
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    (2013) Median Neuropathy at the Wrist. in Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders, eds Preston D, Shapiro B (Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia (PA)), 3rd ed, 267–288.
  23. ↵
    1. Al-Shekhlee A,
    2. Fernandes Filho JA,
    3. Sukul D,
    4. Preston DC
    (2006) Optimal recording electrode placement in the lumbrical-interossei comparison study. Muscle Nerve 33, 289–293.
  24. ↵
    1. Boonyapisit K,
    2. Katirji B,
    3. Shapiro BE,
    4. Preston DC
    (2002) Lumbrical and interossei recording in severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 25, 102–105.
  25. ↵
    1. Meena AK,
    2. Srinivasa Rao B,
    3. Sailaja S,
    4. Mallikarjuna M,
    5. Borgohain R
    (2008) Second lumbrical and interossei latency difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 119, 2789–2794.
  26. ↵
    1. Vogt T,
    2. Mika A,
    3. Thömke F,
    4. Hopf HC
    (1997) Evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 20, 153–157.
  27. ↵
    1. Robinson LR,
    2. Micklesen PJ,
    3. Wang L
    (2000) Optimizing the number of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 23, 1880–1882.
  28. ↵
    1. Roy J,
    2. Henry BM,
    3. PĘkala PA,
    4. Vikse J,
    5. Saganiak K,
    6. Walocha JA,
    7. et al.
    (2016) Median and ulnar nerve anastomoses in the upper limb: A meta-analysis. Muscle Nerve 54, 36–47.
  29. ↵
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    (2013) Anomalous Innervations. in Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders, eds Preston D, Shapiro B (Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia (PA)), 3rd ed, 62–70.
  30. ↵
    1. Ganes T
    (1992) Complete ulnar innervation of the thenar muscles combined with normal sensory fibres in a subject with no peripheral nerve lesion. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 32, 559–563.
  31. ↵
    1. Gutmann L
    (1993) AAEM minimonograph #2: important anomalous innervations of the extremities. Muscle Nerve 16, 339–347.
  32. ↵
    1. Kim BJ,
    2. Date ES,
    3. Lee SH,
    4. Lau EW,
    5. Park MK
    (2004) Unilateral all ulnar hand including sensory without forearm communication. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83, 569–573.
  33. ↵
    1. Robinson L
    (2013) We should not use a modifier to describe the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 48, 334–533.
  34. ↵
    1. Sucher BM
    (2013) Grading severity of carpal tunnel syndrome in electrodiagnostic reports: why grading is recommended. Muscle Nerve 48, 331–333.
  35. ↵
    1. Padua L,
    2. LoMonaco M,
    3. Gregori B,
    4. Valente EM,
    5. Padua R,
    6. Tonali P
    (1997) Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand 96, 211–217.
  36. ↵
    1. Bland JD
    (2000) A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 23, 1280–1283.
    1. Brooks BR,
    2. Miller RG,
    3. Swash M,
    4. Munsat TL,
    5. World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases
    (2000) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1, 293–299.
    1. Levin KH
    (2012) Approach to the patient with suspected radiculopathy. Neurol Clin 30, 581–604.
    1. Levin KH,
    2. Maggiano HJ,
    3. Wilbourn AJ
    (1996) Cervical radiculopathies: comparison of surgical and EMG localization of single-root lesions. Neurology 46, 1022–1025.
    1. Ferrante MA,
    2. Wilbourn AJ
    (2002) Electrodiagnostic approach to the patient with suspected brachial plexopathy. Neurol Clin 20, 423–450.
    1. McGillicuddy JE
    (2004) Cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathy, and thoracic outlet syndrome: how to differentiate? Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1, 179–187.
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B
    (2013) Proximal Median Neuropathy. in Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders, eds Preston D, Shapiro B (Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia (PA)), 3rd ed, 289–297.
    1. Dumitru D,
    2. Amato AA,
    3. Zwarts MJ
    1. Amato A,
    2. Dumitru D
    (2002) Acquired Neuropathies. in Electrodiagnostic Medicine, eds Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ (Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia (PA)), 937–1041.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Neurosciences Journal: 22 (3)
Neurosciences Journal
Vol. 22, Issue 3
1 Jul 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Neurosciences Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: approach and pitfalls
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Neurosciences Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Neurosciences Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: approach and pitfalls
Mohammed H. Alanazy
Neurosciences Journal Jul 2017, 22 (3) 169-180; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2017.3.20160638

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: approach and pitfalls
Mohammed H. Alanazy
Neurosciences Journal Jul 2017, 22 (3) 169-180; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2017.3.20160638
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Structural and functional changes in the hippocampus induced by environmental exposures
  • Tumefactive demyelinating lesions: A literature review of recent findings
  • Epilepsia partialis continua: A review
Show more Review Article

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • home

More Information

  • Help

Additional journals

  • All Topics

Other Services

  • About

© 2025 Neurosciences Journal Neurosciences is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3183. Print ISSN 1319-6138.

Powered by HighWire