Electrodiagnostic reference data for sensory nerve conduction studies in Saudi Arabia

References

1. ↵
   1. Buschbacher RM

   (1999) Median 14-cm and 7-cm antidromic sensory studies to digits two and three. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78, S53–S62.
2. ↵
   1. Buschbacher RM

   (1999) Ulnar 14-cm and 7-cm antidromic sensory studies to the fifth digit: reference values derived from a large population of normal subjects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78, S63–S68.
3. ↵
   1. Chen S,
   2. Andary M,
   3. Buschbacher R,
   4. Del Toro D,
   5. Smith B,
   6. So Y,
   7. et al.

   (2016) Electrodiagnostic reference values for upper and lower limb nerve conduction studies in adult populations. Muscle Nerve 54, 371–377.
4. ↵
   1. Rivner MH,
   2. Swift TR,
   3. Malik K

   (2001) Influence of age and height on nerve conduction. Muscle Nerve 24, 1134–1141.
5. ↵
   1. Buschbacher RM,
   2. Koch J

   (1999) Race effect on nerve conduction studies: a comparison between 50 blacks and 50 whites. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80, 536–539.
6. ↵
   1. Lahoria R,
   2. Litchy W,
   3. Dyck PJB,
   4. Davies J,
   5. Carter R,
   6. Dyck P

   (2014) Reference Attributes of Nerve Conduction and Ethnicity: Comparison in Northern Plain Indians, Mexican Americans and Caucasians (P6. 097). AAN Enterprises.
7. ↵
   1. Shivji Z,
   2. Jabeen A,
   3. Awan S,
   4. Khan S

   (2019) Developing Normative Reference Values for Nerve Conduction Studies of Commonly Tested Nerves among a Sample Pakistani Population. J Neurosci Rural Pract 10, 178–184.
8. ↵
   1. Fong SY,
   2. Goh KJ,
   3. Shahrizaila N,
   4. Wong KT,
   5. Tan CT

   (2016) Effects of demographic and physical factors on nerve conduction study values of healthy subjects in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Muscle Nerve 54, 244–248.
9. ↵
   1. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine

   (1992) American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve 15, 229–253.
10. ↵
    1. Bolton CF,
    2. Benstead TJ,
    3. Grand’Maison F,
    4. Tardif GS,
    5. Weston LE

    (2000) Minimum standards for electromyography in Canada: a statement of the Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists. Can J Neurol Sci 27, 288–291.
11. ↵
    1. Falck B,
    2. Stålberg E

    (1995) Motor nerve conduction studies: measurement principles and interpretation of findings. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 12, 254–279.
12. ↵
    1. Dillingham T,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Andary M,
    4. Buschbacher R,
    5. Del Toro D,
    6. Smith B,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Establishing high-quality reference values for nerve conduction studies: A report from the normative data task force of the American Association Of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve 54, 366–370.
13. ↵
    1. Alanazy M,
    2. Alkhawajah N,
    3. Aldraihem M,
    4. Muayqil T

    (2020) Electrodiagnostic reference data for motor nerve conduction studies in Saudi Arabia. Neurosciences 25, 25–31.
14. ↵
    1. Preston D,
    2. Shapiro B

    (2012) Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic Correlations (Elsevier’s Health Sciences, Philadelphia (PA)), 3rd ed.
15. ↵
    1. Alanazy MH

    (2017) Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: approach and pitfalls. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 22, 169–180.
16. ↵
    1. Peng L,
    2. Wuu J,
    3. Benatar M

    (2009) Developing reference data for nerve conduction studies: an application of quantile regression. Muscle Nerve 40, 763–771.
17. ↵
    1. Dorfman LJ,
    2. Robinson LR

    (1997) AAEM minimonograph #47: normative data in electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 20, 4–14.
18. ↵
    1. Evanoff V,
    2. Buschbacher RM

    (2006) Radial versus dorsal ulnar cutaneous sensory studies. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16, 349–358.
19. ↵
    1. Buschbacher RM

    (2003) Sural and saphenous 14-cm antidromic sensory nerve conduction studies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82, 421–426.
20. ↵
    1. Prahlow ND,
    2. Buschbacher RM

    (2006) An antidromic study of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, with a comparison of the differences between medial and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve latencies. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16, 369–376.
21. ↵
    1. Buschbacher R,
    2. Koch J,
    3. Emsley C,
    4. Katz B

    (2000) Electrodiagnostic reference values for the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve: standardization of a 10-cm distance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81, 1563–1566.
22. ↵
    1. Alemdar M

    (2014) Effects of gender and age on median and ulnar nerve sensory responses over ring finger. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 24, 52–57.
23. ↵
    1. Stetson DS,
    2. Albers JW,
    3. Silverstein BA,
    4. Wolfe RA

    (1992) Effects of age, sex, and anthropometric factors on nerve conduction measures. Muscle Nerve Off J Am Assoc Electrodiagn Med 15, 1095–1104.
24. ↵
    1. Fujimaki Y,
    2. Kuwabara S,
    3. Sato Y,
    4. Isose S,
    5. Shibuya K,
    6. Sekiguchi Y,
    7. et al.

    (2009) The effects of age, gender, and body mass index on amplitude of sensory nerve action potentials: multivariate analyses. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 120, 1683–1686.
25. ↵
    1. Salerno DF,
    2. Franzblau A,
    3. Werner RA,
    4. Bromberg MB,
    5. Armstrong TJ,
    6. Albers JW

    (1998) Median and ulnar nerve conduction studies among workers: normative values. Muscle Nerve 21, 999–1005.
26. ↵
    1. Grossart EA,
    2. Prahlow ND,
    3. Buschbacher RM

    (2006) Acceptable differences in sensory and motor latencies between the median and ulnar nerves. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16, 395–400.
27. ↵
    1. Buschbacher RM

    (1999) Mixed nerve conduction studies of the median and ulnar nerves. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78, S69–S74.
28. ↵
    1. Berkson A,
    2. Lohman J,
    3. Buschbacher RM

    (2006) Median and ulnar antidromic sensory studies to the fourth digit. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16, 377–386.
29. ↵
    1. Benatar M,
    2. Wuu J,
    3. Peng L

    (2009) Reference data for commonly used sensory and motor nerve conduction studies. Muscle Nerve 40, 772–794.