Effectiveness of radiology modalities in diagnosing and characterizing brain disorders

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Siuly S,
   2. Zhang Y

   . Medical big data: neurological diseases diagnosis through medical data analysis. Data Sci Eng 2016; 1: 54–64.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   1. Wingerchuk DM,
   2. Carter JL

   . Multiple sclerosis: current and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment strategies. Mayo Clin Proceedings 2014; 89: 225–240.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   1. Holle D,
   2. Obermann M

   . The role of neuroimaging in the diagnosis of headache disorders. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2013; 6: 369–374.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   1. Purandare NC

   . Inclusion of brain in FDG PET/CT scanning techniques in cancer patients: Does it obviate the need for dedicated brain imaging?. Ind J Nucl Med 2011; 26: 64.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   1. Gao H,
   2. Jiang X

   . Progress on the diagnosis and evaluation of brain tumors. Cancer Imaging 2013; 13: 466.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. 6.↵
   1. Weiss D,
   2. McLeod-Henning D,
   3. Waltke H

   . Using advanced imaging technologies to enhance autopsy practices. NIJ J 2018; 279: 27–33.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   1. Meijer FJ,
   2. Goraj B,
   3. Bloem BR,
   4. Esselink RA

   . Clinical application of brain MRI in the diagnostic work-up of parkinsonism. J Parkinsons Dis 2017; 7: 211–217.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   1. Seppi K,
   2. Poewe W

   . Brain magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndromes. Neuroimaging Clin 2010; 20: 29–55.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
9. 9.↵
   1. Weingarten CP,
   2. Sundman MH,
   3. Hickey P,
   4. Chen NK

   . Neuroimaging of Parkinson’s disease: Expanding views. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015; 59: 16–52.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    1. Bamberg F,
    2. Kauczor HU,
    3. Weckbach S,
    4. Schlett CL,
    5. Forsting M,
    6. Ladd SC, et al.

    Whole-body MR imaging in the German National Cohort: rationale, design, and technical background. Radiology 2015; 277: 206–220.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    1. Völzke H,
    2. Schmidt CO,
    3. Hegenscheid K,
    4. Kühn JP,
    5. Bamberg F,
    6. Lieb W, et al.

    Population imaging as a valuable tool for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012; 92: 422–424.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Li B,
    3. Jin S,
    4. Liu W,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Xie S, et al.

    Comparing the effectiveness of brain structural imaging, resting-state fMRI, and naturalistic fMRI in recognizing social anxiety disorder in children and adolescents. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2022; 323: 111485.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    1. Bauer S,
    2. Wiest R,
    3. Nolte LP,
    4. Reyes M

    . A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58: R97.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
14. 14.
    1. Siuly S,
    2. Kabir E,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Zhang Y

    . Exploring sampling in the detection of multicategory EEG signals. Comput Math Methods Med 2015; 2015.

    Google Scholar
15. 15.↵
    1. Taleb-Ahmed A,
    2. Dubois P,
    3. Duquenoy E

    . Analysis methods of CT-scan images for the characterization of the bone texture: First results. Pattern Recognit Lett 2003; 24: 1971–1982.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    1. Yin XX,
    2. Hadjiloucas S,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Su MY,
    5. Miao Y,
    6. Abbott D

    . Pattern identification of biomedical images with time series: Contrasting THz pulse imaging with DCE-MRIs. Artif Intell Med 2016; 67: 1–23.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    1. Yin X,
    2. Ng BW,
    3. He J,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Abbott D

    . Accurate image analysis of the retina using hessian matrix and binarisation of thresholded entropy with application of texture mapping. PloS one 2014; 9: e95943.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    1. Degnan AJ,
    2. Levy LM

    . Pseudotumor cerebri: a brief review of clinical syndrome and imaging findings. Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1986–1993.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    1. Jindal MA,
    2. Gaikwad HS,
    3. Hasija BD,
    4. Vani K

    . Comparison of neuroimaging by CT and MRI and correlation with neurological presentation in eclampsia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet 2013; 2: 84.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
20. 20.↵
    1. Alam-Eldeen MH,
    2. Hasan NM

    . Assessment of the diagnostic reliability of brain CT and MRI in pediatric epilepsy patients. Egypt J Radiol Nuclear Med 2015; 46: 1129–1141.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
21. 21.↵
    1. Qin Y,
    2. Bao A,
    3. Li H,
    4. Wang X,
    5. Zhang G,
    6. Zhu J

    . Application value of CT and MRI in the diagnosis of primary brain lymphoma. Oncol Lett 2018; 15: 8500–8504.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
22. 22.↵
    1. Bafaraj SM

    . Evaluation of neurological disorder using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Biosci Med 2021; 9: 42.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
23. 23.↵
    1. Shetewi SG,
    2. Al Mutairi BS,
    3. Bafaraj SM

    . The Role of Imaging in Examining Neurological Disorders; Assessing Brain, Stroke, and Neurological Disorders Using CT and MRI Imaging. Adv CT 2020; 9: 1–1.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
24. 24.↵
    1. Clayton JA

    . Sex influences in neurological disorders: case studies and perspectives. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2022.

    Google Scholar
25. 25.↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Qin W,
    3. Nan J,
    4. Li J,
    5. Yuan K,
    6. Zhao L, et al.

    Gender-related differences in the dysfunctional resting networks of migraine suffers. PloS one 2011; 6: e27049.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
26. 26.↵
    1. Camargo EE

    . Brain SPECT in neurology and psychiatry. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 611–623.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar