Stroke rehabilitation

References

1. ↵
   1. Robert AA,
   2. Zamzami MM

   (2014) Stroke in Saudi Arabia: a review of the recent literature. Pan Afr Med J 17, 14.
2. ↵
   1. Belval B,
   2. Lebowitz H

   1. Gershkoff A,
   2. Moon D,
   3. Fincke A,
   4. Dangaria H

   (2015) Stroke Rehabilitation. in Current Diagnosis & Treatment: Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, eds Belval B, Lebowitz H (McGraw-Hill Global Education, Columbus (OH)).
3. ↵
   1. Benamer HT,
   2. Grosset D

   (2009) Stroke in Arab countries: a systematic literature review. J Neurol Sci 284, 18–23.
4. ↵
   1. Al Khathaami AM,
   2. Algahtani H,
   3. Alwabel A,
   4. Alosherey N,
   5. Kojan S,
   6. Aljumah M

   (2011) The status of acute stroke care in Saudi Arabia: an urgent call for action! Int J Stroke 6, 75–76.
5. ↵
   1. Silva SM,
   2. Corrêa FI,
   3. Faria CD,
   4. Buchalla CM,
   5. Silva PF,
   6. Corrêa JC

   (2015) Evaluation of post-stroke functionality based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a proposal for use of assessment tools. J Phys Ther Sci 27, 1665–1670.
6. ↵
   1. Sundseth A,
   2. Thommessen B,
   3. Ronning OM

   (2012) Outcome after mobilization within 24 hours of acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 43, 2389–2394.
7. ↵
   1. Morreale M,
   2. Marchione P,
   3. Pili A,
   4. Lauta A,
   5. Castiglia SF,
   6. Spallone A,
   7. et al.

   (2016) Early versus delayed rehabilitation treatment in hemiplegic patients with ischemic stroke: proprioceptive or cognitive approach? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 52, 81–89.
8. ↵
   1. O’Sullivan SB,
   2. Schmitz TJ,
   3. Fulk GD

   , eds (2014) Physical rehabilitation (F.A. Davis Co, Philadelphia (PA)), 6th ed.
9. ↵
   1. Fjærtoft H,
   2. Rohweder G,
   3. Indredavik B

   (2011) Stroke unit care combined with early supported discharge improves 5-year outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 42, 1707–1711.
10. ↵
    1. Langhorne P,
    2. Fearon P,
    3. Ronning OM,
    4. Kaste M,
    5. Palomaki H,
    6. Vemmos K,
    7. et al.

    (2013) Stroke unit care benefits patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 44, 3044–3049.
11. ↵
    1. Zhu Z,
    2. Cui L,
    3. Yin M,
    4. Yu Y,
    5. Zhou X,
    6. Wang H,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Hydrotherapy vs. conventional land-based exercise for improving walking and balance after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 30, 587–593.
12. ↵
    1. Clarke DJ,
    2. Forster A

    (2015) Improving post-stroke recovery: the role of the multidisciplinary health care team. J Multidiscip Healthc 8, 433–442.
13. ↵
    1. Graham LA

    (2013) Organization of rehabilitation services. Handb Clin Neurol 110, 113–120.
14. ↵
    1. Page SJ,
    2. Schmid A,
    3. Harris JE

    (2012) Optimizing terminology for stroke motor rehabilitation: recommendations from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Stroke Movement Interventions Subcommittee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93, 1395–1399.
15. ↵
    1. Bernhardt J,
    2. Churilov L,
    3. Ellery F,
    4. Collier J,
    5. Chamberlain J,
    6. Langhorne P,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT). Neurology 86, 2138–2145.
16. ↵
    1. Knecht S,
    2. Hesse S,
    3. Oster P

    (2011) Rehabilitation after stroke. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108, 600–606.
17. ↵
    1. Tyson S,
    2. Wilkinson J,
    3. Thomas N,
    4. Selles R,
    5. McCabe C,
    6. Tyrrell P,
    7. et al.

    (2015) Phase II Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient-Led Therapies (Mirror Therapy and Lower-Limb Exercises) During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29, 818–826.
18. ↵
    1. Chan DK,
    2. Levi C,
    3. Cordato D,
    4. O’Rourke F,
    5. Chen J,
    6. Redmond H,
    7. et al.

    (2014) Health service management study for stroke: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate two models of stroke care. Int J Stroke 9, 400–405.
19. ↵
    1. Pandian S,
    2. Arya KN,
    3. Kumar D

    (2014) Does motor training of the nonparetic side influences balance and function in chronic stroke? A pilot RCT. ScientificWorldJournal 2014, 769726.
20. ↵
    1. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke

    (2013) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9, CD000197.
21. ↵
    1. Pollock A,
    2. Baer G,
    3. Campbell P,
    4. Choo PL,
    5. Forster A,
    6. Morris J,
    7. et al.

    (2014) Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD001920.
22. ↵
    1. Visser MM,
    2. Heijenbrok-Kal MH,
    3. Spijker AV,
    4. Oostra KM,
    5. Busschbach JJ,
    6. Ribbers GM

    (2015) Coping, problem solving, depression, and health-related quality of life in patients receiving outpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96, 1492–1498.
23. ↵
    1. Langhorne P,
    2. Bernhardt J,
    3. Kwakkel G

    (2011) Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377, 1693–1702.
24. ↵
    1. Mackay-Lyons M,
    2. McDonald A,
    3. Matheson J,
    4. Eskes G,
    5. Klus MA

    (2013) Dual effects of body-weight supported treadmill training on cardiovascular fitness and walking ability early after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27, 644–653.
25. ↵
    1. Tripp F,
    2. Krakow K

    (2014) Effects of an aquatic therapy approach (Halliwick-Therapy) on functional mobility in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 28, 432–439.
26. ↵
    1. Liu KP,
    2. Chan CC

    (2014) Pilot randomized controlled trial of self-regulation in promoting function in acute poststroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95, 1262–1267.
27. ↵
    1. Meyer MJ,
    2. Pereira S,
    3. McClure A,
    4. Teasell R,
    5. Thind A,
    6. Koval J,
    7. et al.

    (2015) A systematic review of studies reporting multivariable models to predict functional outcomes after post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 37, 1316–1323.
28. ↵
    1. Koopmans RT,
    2. Lavrijsen JC,
    3. Hoek JF,
    4. Went PB,
    5. Schols JM

    (2010) Dutch elderly care physician: a new generation of nursing home physician specialists. J Am Geriatr Soc 58, 1807–1809.
29. ↵
    1. Lenze EJ,
    2. Host HH,
    3. Hildebrand MW,
    4. Morrow-Howell N,
    5. Carpenter B,
    6. Freedland KE,
    7. et al.

    (2012) Enhanced medical rehabilitation increases therapy intensity and engagement and improves functional outcomes in postacute rehabilitation of older adults: a randomized-controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13, 708–712.
30. ↵
    1. Mees M,
    2. Klein J,
    3. Yperzeele L,
    4. Vanacker P,
    5. Cras P

    (2016) Predicting discharge destination after stroke: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 142, 15–21.
31. ↵
    1. Allen L,
    2. Richardson M,
    3. McIntyre A,
    4. Janzen S,
    5. Meyer M,
    6. Ure D,
    7. et al.

    (2014) Community stroke rehabilitation teams: providing home-based stroke rehabilitation in Ontario, Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 41, 697–703.
32. ↵
    1. Barzel A,
    2. Ketels G,
    3. Stark A,
    4. Tetzlaff B,
    5. Daubmann A,
    6. Wegscheider K,
    7. et al.

    (2015) Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 14, 893–902.
33. ↵
    1. Hillier S,
    2. Inglis-Jassiem G

    (2010) Rehabilitation for community-dwelling people with stroke: home or centre based? A systematic review. Int J Stroke 5, 178–186.
34. ↵
    1. Pierce LL,
    2. Steiner V,
    3. Smelser J

    (2009) Stroke caregivers share ABCs of caring. Rehabil Nurs 34, 200–208.
35. ↵
    1. Demain S,
    2. Burridge J,
    3. Ellis-Hill C,
    4. Hughes AM,
    5. Yardley L,
    6. Tedesco-Triccas L,
    7. et al.

    (2013) Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res 13, 334.
36. ↵
    1. Saposnik G,
    2. Levin M,
    3. Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group

    (2011) Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 42, 1380–1386.
37. ↵
    1. Laver KE,
    2. George S,
    3. Thomas S,
    4. Deutsch JE,
    5. Crotty M

    (2015) Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, CD008349.
38. ↵
    1. Lloréns R,
    2. Noé E,
    3. Colomer C,
    4. Alcañiz M

    (2015) Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96, 418–425.
39. ↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Jin W,
    3. Zhang XX,
    4. Xu W,
    5. Liu XN,
    6. Ren CC

    (2015) Telerehabilitation Approaches for Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 24, 2660–2668.
40. ↵
    1. Corbetta D,
    2. Imeri F,
    3. Gatti R

    (2015) Rehabilitation that incorporates virtual reality is more effective than standard rehabilitation for improving walking speed, balance and mobility after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother 61, 117–124.
41. ↵
    1. Poli P,
    2. Morone G,
    3. Rosati G,
    4. Masiero S

    (2013) Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients’ therapy. Biomed Res Int 2013, 153872.
42. ↵
    1. Norouzi-Gheidari N,
    2. Archambault PS,
    3. Fung J

    (2012) Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev 49, 479–496.
43. ↵
    1. Baker K,
    2. Cano SJ,
    3. Playford ED

    (2011) Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy. Stroke 42, 1787–1794.
44. ↵
    1. Quintas R,
    2. Cerniauskaite M,
    3. Ajovalasit D,
    4. Sattin D,
    5. Boncoraglio G,
    6. Parati EA,
    7. et al.

    (2012) Describing functioning, disability, and health with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Brief Core Set for Stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91, S14–S21.
45. ↵
    1. Lemberg I,
    2. Kirchberger I,
    3. Stucki G,
    4. Cieza A

    (2010) The ICF Core Set for stroke from the perspective of physicians: a worldwide validation study using the Delphi technique. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 46, 377–388.
46. ↵
    1. Bindawas SM

    (2014) Physical Therapy Entry-level Education and Post-professional Training in Saudi Arabia: A Comparison of Perceptions of Physical Therapists from Five Regions. J Phys Ther Sci 26, 1377–1382.
47. ↵
    1. Hoving JL,
    2. Kok R,
    3. Ketelaar SM,
    4. Smits PB,
    5. van Dijk FJ,
    6. Verbeek JH

    (2016) Improved quality and more attractive work by applying EBM in disability evaluations: a qualitative survey. BMC Med Educ 16, 77.
48. ↵
    1. Bindawas SM

    (2013) Evidence-based Health Care Continuing Education Seminars Improve Academic Staff Knowledge and Attitudes in Saudi Arabia. Pak J Med Sci 29, 703–709.
49. ↵
    1. Meschia JF,
    2. Bushnell C,
    3. Boden-Albala B,
    4. Braun LT,
    5. Bravata DM,
    6. Chaturvedi S,
    7. et al.

    (2014) Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 45, 3754–832.
50. ↵
    1. Mayo NE,
    2. Poissant L,
    3. Ahmed S,
    4. Finch L,
    5. Higgins J,
    6. Salbach NM,
    7. et al.

    (2004) Incorporating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) into an electronic health record to create indicators of function: proof of concept using the SF-12. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11, 514–522.
51. ↵
    1. Knüppel H,
    2. Metz C,
    3. Meerpohl JJ,
    4. Strech D

    (2013) How psychiatry journals support the unbiased translation of clinical research. A cross-sectional study of editorial policies. PLoS One 8, e75995.
52. 1. Enderby PM,
    2. Wood VA,
    3. Wade DT,
    4. Hewer RL

    (1987) The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 8, 166–170.
53. 1. Gladstone DJ,
    2. Danells CJ,
    3. Black SE

    (2002) The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16, 232–240.
54. 1. Zigmond AS,
    2. Snaith RP

    (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67, 361–370.
55. 1. Gregson JM,
    2. Leathley M,
    3. Moore AP,
    4. Sharma AK,
    5. Smith TL,
    6. Watkins CL

    (1999) Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80, 1013–1016.
56. 1. Tombaugh TN,
    2. McIntyre NJ

    (1992) The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 40, 922–935.
57. 1. Keith RA,
    2. Granger CV,
    3. Hamilton BB,
    4. Sherwin FS

    (1987) The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1, 6–18.
58. 1. Mahoney FI,
    2. Barthel DW

    (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 14, 61–65.
59. 1. Van der Lee JH,
    2. De Groot V,
    3. Beckerman H,
    4. Wagenaar RC,
    5. Lankhorst GJ,
    6. Bouter LM

    (2001) The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82, 14–19.
60. 1. Carr JH,
    2. Shepherd RB,
    3. Nordholm L,
    4. Lynne D

    (1985) Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 65, 175–180.
61. 1. Dunn A,
    2. Marsden DL,
    3. Nugent E,
    4. Van Vliet P,
    5. Spratt NJ,
    6. Attia J,
    7. et al.

    (2015) Protocol variations and six-minute walk test performance in stroke survivors: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Stroke Res Treat 2015, 484813.
62. 1. Duncan PW,
    2. Wallace D,
    3. Lai SM,
    4. Johnson D,
    5. Embretson S,
    6. Laster LJ

    (1999) The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30, 2131–2140.
63. 1. Anderson C,
    2. Laubscher S,
    3. Burns R

    (1996) Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 27, 1812–1816.
64. 1. Ebrahim S,
    2. Barer D,
    3. Nouri F

    (1986) Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health 40, 166–169.
65. 1. Wood-Dauphinee SL,
    2. Opzoomer MA,
    3. Williams JI,
    4. Marchand B,
    5. Spitzer WO

    (1988) Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69, 583–590.
66. 1. Brooks R

    (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37, 53–72.