Assessment of demographic and clinical characteristics on functional status and disability of patients with stroke

References

1. ↵
   1. Geroin C,
   2. Mazzoleni S,
   3. Smania N,
   4. Gandolfi M,
   5. Bonaiuti D,
   6. Gasperini G,
   7. et al.

   (2013) Systematic review of outcome measures of walking training using electromechanical and robotic devices in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med 45, 987–996.
2. ↵
   1. Gunaydin R,
   2. Karatepe AG,
   3. Kaya T,
   4. Ulutas O

   (2011) Determinants of quality of life (QoL) in elderly stroke patients: a short-term follow-up study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 53, 19–23.
3. ↵
   1. Patel MD,
   2. Tilling K,
   3. Lawrence E,
   4. Rudd AG,
   5. Wolfe CD,
   6. McKevitt C

   (2006) Relationships between long-term stroke disability, handicap and health-related quality of life. Age Ageing 35, 273–279.
4. ↵
   1. Milinavičienė E,
   2. Rastenytė D,
   3. Kriščiūnas A

   (2011) Effectiveness of the second-stage rehabilitation in stroke patients with cognitive impairment. Medicina (Kaunas) 47, 486–493.
5. ↵
   1. Cioncoloni D,
   2. Piu P,
   3. Tassi R,
   4. Acampa M,
   5. Guideri F,
   6. Taddei S,
   7. et al.

   (2012) Relationship between the modified Rankin Scale and the Barthel Index in the process of functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 30, 315–322.
6. ↵
   1. Feigin VL,
   2. Wiebers DO,
   3. Nikitin YP,
   4. O’Fallon WM,
   5. Whisnant JP

   (1998) Risk factors for ischemic stroke in a Russian community: a population-based case-control study. Stroke 29, 34–39.
7. ↵
   1. Sun H,
   2. Zou X,
   3. Liu L

   (2013) Epidemiological factors of stroke: a survey of the current status in china. J Stroke 15, 109–114.
8. ↵
   1. Bagg S,
   2. Pombo AP,
   3. Hopman W

   (2002) Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 33, 179–185.
9. ↵
   1. Brunnström S

   , ed (1970) Movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach (Harper & Row, New York (NY)).
10. ↵
    1. Ashworth B

    (1964) Preliminary trial of carısoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 192, 540–542.
11. ↵
    1. Bohannon RW,
    2. Smith MB

    (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67, 206–207.
12. ↵
    1. Holden MK,
    2. Gill KM,
    3. Magliozzi M,
    4. Nathan J,
    5. Piehl-Baker L

    (1984) Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 64, 35–40.
13. ↵
    1. Mahoney FI,
    2. Barthel DW

    (1965) Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14, 61–65.
14. 1. Shah S,
    2. Vanclay F,
    3. Cooper B

    (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42, 703–709.
15. ↵
    1. Küçükdeveci AA,
    2. Yavuzer G,
    3. Tennant BA,
    4. Süldür N,
    5. Sonel B,
    6. Arasıl T

    (2000) Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med 32, 87–92.
16. ↵
    1. van Swieten JC,
    2. Koudstaal PJ,
    3. Visser MC,
    4. Schouten HJ,
    5. van Gijn J

    (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19, 604–607.
17. ↵
    1. Banks JL,
    2. Marotta CA

    (2007) Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 38, 1091–1096.
18. ↵
    1. Collen FM,
    2. Wade DT,
    3. Robb GF,
    4. Bradshaw CM

    (1991) The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 13, 50–54.
19. ↵
    1. Sacco RL,
    2. Benjamin EJ,
    3. Broderick JP,
    4. Dyken M,
    5. Easton JD,
    6. Feinberg WM,
    7. et al.

    (1997) American Heart Association Prevention Conference. IV. Prevention and Rehabilitation of Stroke. Risk factors. Stroke 28, 1507–1517.
20. ↵
    1. Sacco RL,
    2. Wolf PA,
    3. Gorelick PB

    (1999) Risk factors and their management for stroke prevention: outlook for 1999 and beyond. Neurology 53, S15–S24.
21. ↵
    1. Cabral NL,
    2. Gonçalves AR,
    3. Longo AL,
    4. Moro CH,
    5. Costa G,
    6. Amaral CH,
    7. et al.

    (2009) IIncidence of stroke subtypes, prognosis and prevalence of risk factors in Joinville, Brazil: a 2 year community based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80, 755–761.
22. ↵
    1. Arboix A,
    2. Cendrós V,
    3. Besa M,
    4. Garcia-Eroles L,
    5. Oliveras M,
    6. Tarqa C,
    7. et al.

    (2008) Trends in risk factors, stroke subtypes and outcome. Nineteen-year data from the Sagrat Cor Hospital of Barcelona stroke registry. Cerebrovasc Dis 26, 509–516.
23. ↵
    1. Dogan A,
    2. Nakipoglu GF,
    3. Aslan DM,
    4. Kaya ZA,
    5. Özgirgin N

    (2004) The rehabilitation results of hemiplegic patients. Turk J Med Sci 34, 385–389.
24. ↵
    1. Zhang LF,
    2. Yang J,
    3. Hong Z,
    4. Yuan GG,
    5. Zhou BF,
    6. Zhao LC,
    7. et al.

    (2003) Proportion of different subtypes of stroke in China. Stroke 34, 2091–2096.
25. ↵
    1. Arboix A,
    2. García-Eroles L,
    3. Massons J,
    4. Oliveres M,
    5. Targa C

    (2000) Lacunar infarcts in patients aged 85 years and older. Acta Neurol Scand 101, 25–29.
26. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Lim LL,
    3. Heler RF,
    4. Fisher J,
    5. Levi CR

    (2003) A prediction model of 1-year mortality for acute ischemic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84, 1006–1011.
27. ↵
    1. Uyttenboogaart M,
    2. Luijckx GJ,
    3. Vroomen PC,
    4. Stewart RE,
    5. De Keyser J

    (2007) Measuring disability in stroke: relationship between the modified Rankin scale and the Barthel index. J Neurol 254, 1113–1117.
28. ↵
    1. Chou K,
    2. Lee G

    (2013) Impaired dynamic balance is associated with falling in post-stroke patients. Tohoku J Exp Med 230, 233–239.
29. ↵
    1. Arboix A,
    2. Padilla I,
    3. Massons J,
    4. García-Eroles L,
    5. Comes E,
    6. Targa C

    (2001) Clinical study of 222 patients with pure motor stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71, 239–242.
30. ↵
    1. Morone G,
    2. Iosa M,
    3. Bragoni M,
    4. De Angelis D,
    5. Venturiero V,
    6. Coiro P,
    7. et al.

    (2012) Who may have durable benefit from robotic gait training?: a 2-year follow-up randomized controlled trial in patients with subacute stroke. Stroke 43, 1140–1142.
31. ↵
    1. Dias D,
    2. Laíns J,
    3. Pereira A,
    4. Nunes R,
    5. Caldas J,
    6. Amaral C,
    7. et al.

    (2007) Can we improve gait skills in chronic hemiplegics? A randomised control trial with gait trainer. Eura Medicophys 43, 499–504.
32. ↵
    1. Eser F,
    2. Yavuzer G,
    3. Karakus D,
    4. Karaoglan B

    (2008) The effect of balance training on motor recovery and ambulation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 44, 19–25.