Neurosciences journal continues to achieve its vision, and mission statements through serving as a leading peer reviewed journal in basic and clinical neurosciences in the region. Disseminating accessible up to date medical information for clinical neuroscientists and promoting neurosciences research with clear clinical implications enriching knowledge locally, regionally, and internationally are our inner concentration.
Third quarter of 2018, the new editorial management system of the journal, ScholarOne, rolled out in full swing. This is part of our commitment to improve our processes to better serve our authors, reviewers and board members. ScholarOne is a familiar interface used by many journals. In a nutshell, authors and volunteer reviewers find it user-friendly and intuitive to use. Its key features, integrated database and automatic reminders are such efficiencies that have become even more important to us given the volume of manuscripts we process at different points of peer review and reassessment.
However, we are facing many challenges to receive the reviewers’ acceptance and complete the review within 5 days. Peer review process is a phase used to assess the quality of papers submitted to journals from expert peers in the field who have strong research background. The process serves also as a filter to publish the best articles received and fulfill our standards. Needless to say, as many journals, we have faced many challenges to complete the process efficiently within the allocated time due to the lack of interest, availability, and the busy schedule of reviewers. Neurosciences journal is thriving hardly to improve the process and attract reviewers and implement incentives.
As shown in our record, only (9%) agree to review the article with an average of 9 days (minimum 10 hours, maximum 35 days). In order to eliminate the bias issues from the reviewers comments; we are sending invitations to reviewers around the world. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, United Sates, Germany and Italy are the top 6 countries of our reviewers.
We also have noticed that the contribution of local publications in terms of quantity and quality have increased over the years. In 2007, the published article from Saudi Arabia was 24% of all publications at that year, but it rose to 45% in 2012 and now more than 50% (Figure 1). We even are expecting to receive more local submissions in the near future and we may need to increase number of articles per issues. This expectation is based on the fact of new regulations of health education authorities that encourage research among medical students, interns and residents in training programs. Add to that, the number of medical colleges have increased rapidly over the last decade.
Shows the percentage of the published articles from Saudi Arabia from 2006-2019.
In 2019, our average rejection rate is 25% (Figure 2). Reasons for rejection included papers outside the scope of the journal, low scientific quality, not meeting the requirements of the journal, authors failing to submit the revisions and other necessary requirements, and duplicate publication. We published 4 issues in 2019, with a total of 54 articles, which included: 30 originals, 1 editorial, 1 obituary, 2 reviews, 11 case reports, 2 clinical notes, 1 brief communications, 3 correspondences and 3 clinical images. The average processing time from received to acceptance was 2.75 (1-6) months, 2.25 months from acceptance to publication (1-5) months and 5 months from received to publications (Figure 3). Sixty-Three percent of published articles were from Saudi Arabia, 22% from Turkey, 4% from Iraq, 4% from and New Zealand and the remaining from UK, Malaysia, and Philippines.
Neurosciences journal received papers for the year 2019.
Shows comparison of processing time frame from acceptance to publication during the year 2007-2019.
In November 30, 2019, we shared in organizing the Annual Medical Publication Workshop. The course was well attended and received by the attendees. This year’s theme covered topics on writing a research proposal, evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal, how to search and format your references, scientific editing for medical writing, how to write a research abstract, writing a strong Introduction, guidelines used in writing a manuscript, publication ethics, peer review process, common reasons for rejection and, tips for publishing your manuscript.
We are pleased with the journal growth and ability in attracting good manuscripts. With that said, and with our latest Journal Impact Factor of 0.892; we are definitely motivated to keep an eye on improving discoverability and visibility of our content and ensuring that the metadata is up-to-date, properly tagged and with enriched contents. We are more encouraged to accept publications from growing interest discipline or trending or medical breakthroughs. We hope all our readers continue to benefit from the published material, and we extend our sincerest thanks to our authors, readers and reviewers, wishing them all a successful fruitful year.
Finally, we extend our thanks to the Editorial and Advisory Board Members for their significant contributions to maintaining the standards of the journal, and we look forward to their important continued role in achieving our goals for 2020. We would like thank them for comments, suggestions and contribution for our online survey.
Waleed Khoja
Associate Editor
Khalid Hundallah
Associate Editor
Our thanks also go to the following reviewers, who have participated in the excellent review of manuscripts and books for the year 2019.
De Masi, Roberto
Al-Baradie, Raidah
alasadiy, yassir
Alghnam, Suliman
Almalki, Daifallah
Almutairi, Aqeel Munahi
ALSALMAN, SADIQ
Al-Suwaidan, Faisal
Altinkaynak, Umut
Asa’ad, Farah
Aydin, Mustafa
AYDIN, TUGBA
Ballestero, Matheus FM
Bashiri, Fahad
Benlidayi, Ilke Coskun
Berciano, Jose
Bhat, Abdul Rashid
Bohlega, Saeed
BOUGEA, ANASTASIA
Boyko , AN
Brasil, Sergio
Camacho, Alessandra CLF
Cecilie, Lander
Chaoruangrit, A.
Chu , MK
Corredor, Fernando Ortiz
Demidas, Aneta
Dorgalaleh, Akbar -
El Sayed , SM
Fathi, Shereen
Faxén-Irving , Gerd
Gandhoke , GS
Gao, Bulang
Gbadebo, Olaide Shakeerah
Gbolahan, Balogun Wasiu
Girabent-Farres, Montserrat
Grimley, Rohan
Hamta, Amir
Isuru, Amila
Jirakittayakorn, Nantawachara
Joubert, B.
Kabak, Vesile Yildiz
Kala, Deepa
Kaliaperumal , Chandrasekaran
Kamisli, Ozden
Kashoo, Faizan Zaffar
Katsanos, Aristeidis H
Keklicek, Hilal
Kendirli, Tansel
Khashram, M.
Klein, Ainat
Kohlschuetter, Alfried
Koroglu, Fatma
Kraemer, Julia
Langhammer, Birgitta
Leticia Brambila-Tapia, Aniel Jessica
Lewis , A
Li, Lai-fung
Mahesh , PKB
Mainieri, Greta
Malaguarnera, Michele
Malik, Rayaz
Mameniskiene, R.
Mannikko, Roope
Matà as Guiu, Jordi
Mehta, Ankit
Mohammed Aljumah, Mohammed
Motiei-Langroudi, Rouzbeh
Muayqil, Taim
Muchiri, Jane
Nemes, Roxana-Maria
Neuhaus, Oliver
Oduntan, Olusola
Ogawa, Katsuhiko
Okasha, Tarek
Oliveira, Ricardo Santos de
Onoufriadis, Alexandros
Owolabi, L. F.
Ozcan, Cemal
Palve, Suchitra Sachin
Pandhi, Abhi
Papanagiotou, Panagiotis
Pauzi, Suria Hayati Md
Prudhvi, Vallampati
Rai, Ansaar T.
Refat, hossam
Saleh, Nermine
Samanta, Debopam
Segraves, Robert
SHAHRIZAILA, NORTINA
Shuaib, Ashfaq
Singh, Deepak
Solari, Domenico
Somma, Teresa
Spina , A
Sukul, Vishad
Szmuda, Tomasz
Tabarki, Brahim
Tallaksen, Chantal
Taylor, Michael D.
Thapa, Lekhjung
Turner, Dana P.
Uchino, Ken
Ullah, A. K. M. Atique
Uribe, Ezequiel
Valko , Y
Valls-Sole, Josep
Walter , U
Wang, Yuan Pang
Wanigasinghe, Jithangi
Xu, Shifen
Yeo, Leonard L. L.
Yigit, Serbulent
Zhang, Hongliang
Zhao, Jizong
Zyoud, Shaher H.
Footnotes
* Reviewers who reviewed 3 or more articles for the year 2019
- Copyright: © Neurosciences
Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.