A systematic review of adults’ sitting balance assessments in neurological and neuromuscular conditions

References

1. ↵
   1. Tyson SF,
   2. Connell LA

   (2009) How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions. Clin Rehabil 23, 824–840.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Abou L,
   2. de Freitas GR,
   3. Palandi J,
   4. Ilha J

   (2018) Clinical Instruments for Measuring Unsupported Sitting Balance in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 24, 177–193.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. World Health Organization

   (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF (World Health Organization, Geneva (CH)).
4. ↵
   1. Sirriyeh R,
   2. Lawton R,
   3. Gardner P,
   4. Armitage G

   (2012) Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. J Eval Clin Pract 18, 746–752.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Jørgensen V,
   2. Elfving B,
   3. Opheim A

   (2011) Assessment of unsupported sitting in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 49, 838–843.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Pastre CB,
   2. Lobo AM,
   3. Oberg TD,
   4. Pithon KR,
   5. Yoneyama SM,
   6. Lima NM

   (2011) Validation of the Brazilian version in Portuguese of the Thoracic-Lumbar Control Scale for spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 49, 1198–1202.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Quinzaños J,
   2. Villa AR,
   3. Flores AA,
   4. Pérez R

   (2014) Proposal and validation of a clinical trunk control test in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 52, 449–454.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Larson CA,
   2. Tezak WD,
   3. Malley MS,
   4. Thornton W

   (2010) Assessment of Postural Muscle Strength in Sitting: Reliability of Measures Obtained With Hand-Held Dynamometry in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 34, 24–31.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Gao KL,
   2. Chan KM,
   3. Purves S,
   4. Tsang WW

   (2014) Reliability of dynamic sitting balance tests and their correlations with functional mobility for wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury. J Orthop Translat 3, 44–49.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Wadhwa G,
    2. Aikat R

    (2016) Development, validity and reliability of the “Sitting Balance Measure” (SBM) in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 54, 319–323.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Lombardi B,
    2. Orioli A,
    3. Casavola D,
    4. Paci M

    (2017) The Italian version of the Trunk Impairment Scale: development and psychometric properties. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 53, 516–520.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Gjelsvik B,
    2. Breivik K,
    3. Verheyden G,
    4. Smedal T,
    5. Hofstad H,
    6. Strand LI

    (2012) The Trunk Impairment Scale - modified to ordinal scales in the Norwegian version. Disabil Rehabil 34, 1385–1395.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Gorman SL,
    2. Radtka S,
    3. Melnick ME,
    4. Abrams GM,
    5. Byl NN

    (2010) Development and validation of the Function In Sitting Test in adults with acute stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 34, 150–160.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Sung J,
    2. Ousley CM,
    3. Shen S,
    4. Isaacs ZJ,
    5. Sosnoff JJ,
    6. Rice LA

    (2016) Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test in nonambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res 39, 308–312.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Tavakol M,
    2. Dennick R

    (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2, 53–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. ↵
    1. Abou L,
    2. Sung J,
    3. Sosnoff JJ,
    4. Rice LA

    (2019) Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test among non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 1–8.
17. ↵
    International prospective register of systematic reviews [Internet]. PROSPERO, . [cited 2020 May 3]. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
18. 1. Moher D,
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Tetzlaff J,
    4. Altman DG,
    5. Prisma Group

    (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS med 6, e1000097.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed