Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurosciences Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Neurosciences Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Characteristics of the Functional Gait Assessment in adolescents with concussion

Abdulaziz A. Alkathiry
Neurosciences Journal July 2023, 28 (3) 165-169; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2023.3.20220140
Abdulaziz A. Alkathiry
From the Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
PT, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Abdulaziz A. Alkathiry
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    - Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the FGA score, comparing adolescents with concussion and controls (AUC = 0.678; 95% CI (0.559–0.797); SE = 0.061; p=.005).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    - Characteristics of the participants and group comparisons.

    CharacteristicsConcussionHealthyP-value (Mann-Whitney)
    (n=27)(n=86)
    n (%)
    Gender (Female, %)19 (70)43 (50).065^
    Age, mean (SD)15.5 (1.1)15.5 (0.9).915
    Weight (Kg), mean (SD)62.7 (15.7)63.3 (14.9).439
    Height (cm), mean (SD)166.2 (9.3)168.9 (8.2).182
    BMI, mean (SD)22.5 (3.8)22.1 (4.6).402
    GS (seconds), mean (SD)5.50 (0.84)5.03 (0.75).008#
    GDT (seconds), mean (SD)1.98 (1.48)1.12 (0.93).011
    Days since injury (med, IQR)63.5 (170.25)  
    • CS - Gait Speed, GDT - Gait Disorientation Test

    • ↵^ - Pearson Chi-Square

    • ↵# - Independent samples T test, MED - median, IQR - Interquartile Range

    • View popup
    Table 2

    - Group comparisons on FGA and individual FGA items.

    Mean (SD)Concussion (n=27)Healthy (n=86)P-value (Mann-Whitney)
    FGA total27.2 (2.5)28.5 (1.4).004**
    FGA 12.5 (0.6)2.8 (0.4).007**
    FGA 22.6 (0.7)3 (0.1)< .001***
    FGA 32.7 (0.6)2.9 (0.2).003**
    FGA 42.9 (0.3)2.9 (0.3).940
    FGA 52.9 (0.3)3 (0.2).390
    FGA 62.9 (0.3)2.9 (0.3).637
    FGA 73 (0.2)2.9 (0.3).821
    FGA 82.1 (1)2.2 (0.9).526
    FGA 92.7 (0.4)2.9 (0.3).008**
    FGA 102.9 (0.4)2.9 (0.3).662
    • FGA - Functional Gait Assessment; FGA 1 - normal walking; FGA 2 - changing speed walking; FGA 3 and FGA 4 - walking during horizontal and vertical head rotations, respectively; FGA 5 - walking and rapid turn; FGA 6 - walking over obstacles; FGA 7 - walking heel-toe; FGA 8 - walking while eyes closed; FGA 9 - backward walking; FGA 10 - ascending and descending stairs.

    • ↵** p<.01

    • ↵*** p<.001

    • View popup
    Table 3

    - Contingency table.

    FGA cutoff ScoreConcussionHealthyTotal
    Positive (FGA ≤ 26)9716
    Negative (FGA > 26)187997
    Total2786113
    • FGA - Functional Gait Assessment

    • View popup
    Table 4

    - Frequency for floor/ceiling effects of FGA items and FGA total.

    FGA ItemsFloor effect n (%)Ceiling effect n (%)
    FGA0 (0)3 (11.1)
    FGA 10 (0)16 (59.3)
    FGA 20 (0)30 (74.1)
    FGA 30 (0)20 (74.1)
    FGA 40 (0)25 (92.6)
    FGA 50 (0)25 (92.6)
    FGA 60 (0)24 (88.9)
    FGA 70 (0)26 (96.3)
    FGA 82 (7.4)12 (44.4)
    FGA 90 (0)20 (74.1)
    FGA 100 (0)23 (85.2)
    • FGA - Functional Gait Assessment; FGA 1 - normal walking; FGA 2 - changing speed walking; FGA 3 and FGA 4 - walking during horizontal and vertical head rotations, respectively; FGA 5 - walking and rapid turn; FGA 6 - walking over obstacles; FGA 7 - walking heel-toe; FGA 8 - walking while eyes closed; FGA 9 - backward walking; FGA 10 - ascending and descending stairs.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Neurosciences Journal: 28 (3)
Neurosciences Journal
Vol. 28, Issue 3
1 Jul 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Neurosciences Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characteristics of the Functional Gait Assessment in adolescents with concussion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Neurosciences Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Neurosciences Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Characteristics of the Functional Gait Assessment in adolescents with concussion
Abdulaziz A. Alkathiry
Neurosciences Journal Jul 2023, 28 (3) 165-169; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2023.3.20220140

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Characteristics of the Functional Gait Assessment in adolescents with concussion
Abdulaziz A. Alkathiry
Neurosciences Journal Jul 2023, 28 (3) 165-169; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2023.3.20220140
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ranking the difficulty of the cognitive tasks in Dual-Tasks during walking in healthy adults
  • Exploring physiotherapist’s ability to identify cauda equina syndrome early
  • Does the severity of facet joint osteoarthritis affect facet medial branch radiofrequency thermocoagulation results?
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • home

More Information

  • Help

Additional journals

  • All Topics

Other Services

  • About

© 2025 Neurosciences Journal Neurosciences is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3183. Print ISSN 1319-6138.

Powered by HighWire