Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

The cranial capacity of the Saudi population measured using 3D computed tomography scans

Khalaf A. Alshamrani
Neurosciences Journal July 2023, 28 (3) 184-189; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2023.3.20230005

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Klein M,
    2. Walters RK,
    3. Demontis D,
    4. Stein JL,
    5. Hibar DP,
    6. Adams HH, et al.
    Genetic markers of ADHD-related variations in intracranial volume. Am J Psychiatry 2019; 176: 228–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ma D,
    2. Popuri K,
    3. Bhalla M,
    4. Sangha O,
    5. Lu D,
    6. Cao J, et al.
    Quantitative assessment of field strength, total intracranial volume, sex, and age effects on the goodness of harmonization for volumetric analysis on the ADNI database. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40: 1507–1527.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. VanSickle C,
    2. Cofran Z,
    3. Hunt D.
    Did Neandertals have large brains? Factors affecting endocranial volume comparisons. Am J Phys Anthropol 2020; 173: 768–775.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sulong S,
    2. Alias A,
    3. Johanabas F,
    4. Yap Abdullah J,
    5. Idris B.
    Intracranial Volume Post Cranial Expansion Surgery Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scan Imaging in Children with Craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31: 46–50.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Murthy SB.
    Estimation of the cranial capacity in dry human skull bones. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2018; 6: 5181–5185.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Taher MB,
    2. Pearson J,
    3. Cohen MT,
    4. Offiah AC.
    Acceptability of post-mortem imaging among Muslim and non-Muslim communities. Br J Radiol 2018; 91: 20180295.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bertsatos A,
    2. Chovalopoulou ME,
    3. Brůžek J,
    4. Bejdová Š.
    Advanced procedures for skull sex estimation using sexually dimorphic morphometric features. Int J Legal Med 2020; 134: 1927–1937.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Neves CA,
    2. Tran ED,
    3. Kessler IM,
    4. Blevins NH.
    Fully automated preoperative segmentation of temporal bone structures from clinical CT scans. Scientific Reports 2021; 11: 1–11.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Shen K,
    4. Chang J,
    5. Cui J.
    Brain CT image segmentation based on 3D slicer. Journal of Complexity in Health Sciences 2020; 3: 34–42.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cacciaguerra G,
    2. Palermo M,
    3. Marino L,
    4. Rapisarda FAS,
    5. Pavone P,
    6. Falsaperla R, et al.
    The Evolution of the Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis: A Narrative Review. Children (Basel) 2021; 8: 727.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Qian Y,
    2. Zhang S,
    3. Tan Q,
    4. Xia J,
    5. Jin G.
    Cranial capacity measurement for modern Chinese adults based on 3D reconstruction. Neurosciences Journal 2021; 26: 277–283.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ni X,
    2. Ji Q,
    3. Wu W,
    4. Shao Q,
    5. Ji Y,
    6. Zhang C, et al.
    Massive cranium from Harbin in northeastern China establishes a new Middle Pleistocene human lineage. Innovation (Camb) 2021; 2: 100130.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    1. Ghosh S,
    2. Kasher M,
    3. Malkina I,
    4. Livshits G.
    Is craniofacial morphology and body composition related by common genes: Comparative analysis of two ethnically diverse populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 2021; 176: 249–261.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Nowzari H,
    2. Jorgensen M.
    Human Dento-Facial Evolution: Cranial Capacity, Facial Expression, Language, Oral Complications and Diseases. Oral 2022; 2: 163–172.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Simmons-Ehrhardt TL,
    2. Ehrhardt CJ,
    3. Monson KL.
    Evaluation of the suitability of cranial measurements obtained from surface-rendered CT scans of living people for estimating sex and ancestry. Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 2019; 19: 100338.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Khanduri S,
    2. Malik S,
    3. Khan N,
    4. Patel YD,
    5. Khan A,
    6. Chawla H, et al.
    Establishment of Cephalic Index Using Cranial Parameters by Computed Tomography in a Sampled North Indian Population. Cureus 2021; 13: e15421.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    3D Slicer image computing platform | 3D Slicer [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.slicer.org/
  18. 18.↵
    1. Scianò F,
    2. Zedda N,
    3. Mongillo J,
    4. Gualdi-Russo E,
    5. Bramanti B.
    Autopsy or anatomical dissection: evidence of a craniotomy in a 17th–eighteenth century burial site (Ravenna, Italy). Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2021; 17: 157–160.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. de Jong LW,
    2. Vidal JS,
    3. Forsberg LE,
    4. Zijdenbos AP,
    5. Haight T,
    6. Sigurdsson S, et al.
    Allometric scaling of brain regions to intra-cranial volume: An epidemiological MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38: 151–164. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.23351
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Eboh DE,
    2. Okoro EC,
    3. Iteire KA.
    A Cross-sectional Anthropometric Study of Cranial Capacity among Ukwuani People of South Nigeria. Malays J Med Sci 2016; 23: 72.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Aladeyelu OS,
    2. Olaniyi KS,
    3. Olojede SO,
    4. Mbatha WBE,
    5. Sibiya AL,
    6. Rennie CO.
    Temporal bone pneumatization: A scoping review on the growth and size of mastoid air cell system with age. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0269360.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Márcia Viana Wanzeler A,
    2. Melo Alves-Júnior S,
    3. Ayres L,
    4. Carolina da Costa Prestes M,
    5. Teixeira Gomes J,
    6. Mesquita Tuji F.
    Sex estimation using paranasal sinus discriminant analysis: a new approach via cone beam computerized tomography volume analysis. Int J Legal Med 2019; 133: 1977–1984.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Beals KL,
    2. Smith CL,
    3. Dodd SM,
    4. Angel JL,
    5. Armstrong E,
    6. Blumenberg B, et al.
    Brain Size, Cranial Morphology, Climate, and Time Machines [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 1984; 3: 301–330.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Rushton JP.
    Mongoloid-Caucasoid differences in brain size from military samples. Intelligence 1991; 15: 351–359.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ilayperuma I.
    Cranial Capacity in an Adult Sri Lankan Population: Sexual Dimorphism and Ethnic Diversity. International Journal of Morphology 2011; 29: 479–484.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kim YS,
    2. Park IS,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Kim D,
    5. Lee NJ,
    6. Rhyu IJ.
    Changes in intracranial volume and cranial shape in modern Koreans over four decades. Am J Phys Anthropol 2018; 166: 753–759.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. McCormick WF,
    2. Acosta-Rua GJ.
    The size of intracranial saccular aneurysms: An autopsy study. J Neurosurg 1970; 33: 422–427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lorenzo C,
    2. Carretero JM,
    3. Arsuaga JL,
    4. Gracia A,
    5. Marti´nez I,
    6. Marti´nez M
    . Intrapopulational Body Size Variation and Cranial Capacity Variation in Middle Pleistocene Humans: The Sima de los Huesos Sample (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). J Phys Anthropol 1998; 106: 19–33.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Jantz RL,
    2. Jantz LM.
    The Remarkable Change in Euro-American Cranial Shape and Size. Hum Biol 2016; 88: 56–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Bin Sunaid FF,
    2. Al-Jawaldeh A,
    3. Almutairi MW,
    4. Alobaid RA,
    5. Alfuraih TM,
    6. Bin Saidan FN, et al.
    Saudi arabia’s healthy food strategy: Progress & hurdles in the 2030 road. Nutrients 2021; 13: 2130. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2130/htm
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section