Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurosciences Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Saudi Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Neurosciences Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Visual evoked potentials follow-up in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Mehmet Hamamci and Temel Tombul
Neurosciences Journal July 2019, 24 (3) 185-191; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2019.3.20190004
Mehmet Hamamci
From the Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Temel Tombul
From the Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Visual evoked potential (VEP) images of a patient who showed improvement in VEP values. Visual evoked potential images and values of a patient 3 hours before lumbar puncture (A). Visual evoked potential images and values of the same patients after one month of treatment (B). [X-axis: latency (ms), Y-axis: amplitude (µV)].

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic and clinical features of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

    Demographic variablesn (%)
    Age (mean±SD)
     Male36.20±12.235
     Female38.11±11.872
    Gender
     Male27 (84)
     Female5 (16)
    Obesity
     Yes20 (63)
     No12 (27)
    Papilledema
     Yes28 (88)
     One-sided1 (3)
     No3 (9)
    Visual field
     Normal7 (22)
     Pathological25 (78)
    Visual acuity
     Normal24 (75)
     Decreased8 (25)
    CSF pressure (mm-water) (mean±SD)386.88±82.753
    Presenting complaint
     Headache32 (100)
     Temporary loss of vision21 (66)
     Photopsy10 (31)
     Diplopia9 (28)
     Eye pain9 (28)
     Tinnitus8 (25)
     Vertigo5 (16)
    Time from the onset of the complaint to diagnosis (median)8.50 (min: 3, max: 547)
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Comparison of the initial VEP values of IIH patients to the VEP values of the healthy control group.

    VariablesInitial VEP results of IIH patients (n=32)VEP results of the healthy control group (n=30)P-value
    Mean±SD
    Right P100, latency (ms)115.10±10.12101.48±2.47<0.001
    Left P100, latency (ms)115.19±10.04101.75±2.88<0.001
    Right amplitude (µV)10.26±4.3610.46±2.630.231
    Left amplitude (µV)9.75±4.2010.36±2.910.122
    • IIH - idiopathic intracranial hypertension, VEP - visual evoked potential, SD - standard deviation

    • View popup
    Table 3

    The relationship of pathological VEP results with gender, obesity, and visual acuity and visual field findings at admission.

    VariablesInitial VEP pathological (n=18)Initial VEP normal (n=14)P-value
    Gender
     Male320.854
     Female1512
    Obesity
     No570.198
     Yes137
    Visual acuity
     Normal11130.040
     Decreased71
    Visual field
     Normal160.011
     Pathological178
    • VEP - visual evoked potential

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Comparison of the initial VEP results of IIH patients with second VEP results

    VariablesInitial VEP results of IIH patientsSecond VEP results of the IIH patientsP-value
    Mean±SD
    Right P100, latency (ms)115.10±10.12118.84±12.5360.045
    Left P100, latency (ms)115.19±10.04118.69±11.0470.049
    Right amplitude (µV)10.26±4.369.84±3.6710.319
    Left amplitude (µV)9.75±4.209.69±3.6930.887
    • IIH - idiopathic intracranial hypertension, VEP - visual evoked potential, SD - standard deviation

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Neurosciences Journal: 24 (3)
Neurosciences Journal
Vol. 24, Issue 3
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Neurosciences Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Visual evoked potentials follow-up in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Neurosciences Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Neurosciences Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Visual evoked potentials follow-up in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Mehmet Hamamci, Temel Tombul
Neurosciences Journal Jul 2019, 24 (3) 185-191; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2019.3.20190004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Visual evoked potentials follow-up in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Mehmet Hamamci, Temel Tombul
Neurosciences Journal Jul 2019, 24 (3) 185-191; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2019.3.20190004
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Does the severity of facet joint osteoarthritis affect facet medial branch radiofrequency thermocoagulation results?
  • Thunderclap headache management among Emergency Department visitors in tertiary care center in Makkah City: Retrospective cohort study
  • Do people with multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia want to know their prognosis? A cross-sectional nationwide study
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • home

More Information

  • Help

Additional journals

  • All Topics

Other Services

  • About

© 2025 Neurosciences Journal Neurosciences is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3183. Print ISSN 1319-6138.

Powered by HighWire