Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Polarity-dependent cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates online functions of the alerting attention network

Aysha N. Kinakool and Turki S. Abualait
Neurosciences Journal October 2021, 26 (4) 323-330; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2021.4.20210013

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Leiner HC,
    2. Leiner AL,
    3. Dow RS.
    Does the cerebellum contribute to mental skills? Behav Neurosci 1986; 100: 443–454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Leiner HC,
    2. Leiner AL,
    3. Dow RS.
    Reappraising the cerebellum: what does the hindbrain contribute to the forebrain? Behav Neurosci 1989; 103: 998–1008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.
    1. Leiner HC,
    2. Leiner AL,
    3. Dow RS.
    Cognitive and language functions of the human cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 1993; 16: 444–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Leiner HC.
    Solving the mystery of the human cerebellum. Neuropsychol Rev 2010; 20: 229–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Krienen FM,
    2. Buckner RL.
    Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19: 2485–2497.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.
    1. O’Reilly JX,
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. Tomassini V,
    4. Ramnani N,
    5. Johansen-Berg H.
    Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 953–965.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bernard JA,
    2. Seidler RD,
    3. Hassevoort KM,
    4. Benson BL,
    5. Welsh RC,
    6. Wiggins JL, et al.
    Resting state cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity networks: a comparison of anatomical and self-organizing map approaches. Front Neuroanat 2012; 6: 31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Buckner RL.
    The cerebellum and cognitive function: 25 years of insight from anatomy and neuroimaging. Neuron 2013; 80: 807–815.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kelly RM,
    2. Strick PL.
    Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 8432–8444.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bostan AC,
    2. Dum RP,
    3. Strick PL.
    Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. Trends Cogn Sci 2013; 17: 241–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Schmahmann JD,
    2. Macmore J,
    3. Vangel M.
    Cerebellar stroke without motor deficit: clinical evidence for motor and non-motor domains within the human cerebellum. Neuroscience 2009; 162: 852–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Petersen SE,
    2. Posner MI.
    The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci 2012; 35: 73–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. McCreery DB,
    2. Agnew WF,
    3. Yuen TG,
    4. Bullara L.
    Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990; 37: 996–1001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. van Dun K,
    2. Bodranghien FC,
    3. Mariën P,
    4. Manto MU.
    tDCS of the cerebellum: where do we stand in 2016? technical issues and critical review of the literature. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10: 199.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Stagg CJ,
    2. Nitsche MA.
    Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011; 17: 37–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Miler JA,
    2. Meron D,
    3. Baldwin DS,
    4. Garner M.
    The effect of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on attention network function in healthy volunteers. Neuromodulation 2018; 21: 355–361.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Silva AF,
    2. Zortea M,
    3. Carvalho S,
    4. Leite J,
    5. Torres IL,
    6. Fregni F, et al.
    Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates attention and pain in fibromyalgia: randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 135.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ugawa Y,
    2. Day BL,
    3. Rothwell JC,
    4. Thompson PD,
    5. Merton PA,
    6. Marsden CD.
    Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man. J Physiol 1991; 441: 57–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Zmigrod S,
    2. Zmigrod L,
    3. Hommel B.
    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict. Neuroscience 2016; 322: 320–325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ferrucci R,
    2. Brunoni AR,
    3. Parazzini M,
    4. Vergari M,
    5. Rossi E,
    6. Fumagalli M, et al.
    Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation. Cerebellum 2013; 12: 485–492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mannarelli D,
    2. Pauletti C,
    3. Currà A,
    4. Marinelli L,
    5. Corrado A,
    6. Delle Chiaie R, et al.
    The cerebellum modulates attention network functioning: evidence from a cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation and attention network test study. Cerebellum 2019; 18: 457–468.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Schlerf JE,
    2. Galea JM,
    3. Bastian AJ,
    4. Celnik PA.
    Dynamic modulation of cerebellar excitability for abrupt, but not gradual, visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 11610–11617.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. van Wessel BW,
    2. Claire Verhage M,
    3. Holland P,
    4. Frens MA,
    5. van der Geest JN.
    Cerebellar tDCS does not affect performance in the N-back task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2016; 38: 319–326.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kinakool AN,
    2. Abualait TS.
    Online polarity-dependent effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor speed and fine manual dexterity. A randomized controlled trial. Saudi Med J 2020; 41: 18–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Veale JF.
    Edinburgh handedness inventory - short form: a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality 2014; 19: 164–177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Piper BJ,
    2. Mueller ST,
    3. Geerken AR,
    4. Dixon KL,
    5. Kroliczak G,
    6. Olsen RH, et al.
    Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the psychology experimental building language test battery in young adults. PeerJ 2015; 3: e1460.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Langner R,
    2. Eickhoff SB.
    Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychol Bull 2013; 139: 870–900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Diamond A.
    Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 2013; 64: 135–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ferrucci R,
    2. Marceglia S,
    3. Vergari M,
    4. Cogiamanian F,
    5. Mrakic-Sposta S,
    6. Mameli F, et al.
    Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20: 1687–1697.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.
    1. Shah B,
    2. Nguyen TT,
    3. Madhavan S.
    Polarity independent effects of cerebellar tDCS on short term ankle visuomotor learning. Brain Stimul 2013; 6: 966–968.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.
    1. Antal A,
    2. Terney D,
    3. Poreisz C,
    4. Paulus W.
    Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2007; 26: 2687–2691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Orban de Xivry JJ,
    2. Marko MK,
    3. Pekny SE,
    4. Pastor D,
    5. Izawa J,
    6. Celnik P, et al.
    Stimulation of the human motor cortex alters generalization patterns of motor learning. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 7102–7110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Nelson JT,
    2. McKinley RA,
    3. Golob EJ,
    4. Warm JS,
    5. Parasuraman R.
    Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuroimage 2014; 85: 909–917.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Coffman BA,
    2. Trumbo MC,
    3. Clark VP.
    Enhancement of object detection with transcranial direct current stimulation is associated with increased attention. BMC Neurosci 2012; 13: 108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Roy LB,
    2. Sparing R,
    3. Fink GR,
    4. Hesse MD.
    Modulation of attention functions by anodal tDCS on right PPC. Neuropsychologia 2015; 74: 96–107.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Bolognini N,
    2. Fregni F,
    3. Casati C,
    4. Olgiati E,
    5. Vallar G.
    Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Res 2010; 1349: 76–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Moos K,
    2. Vossel S,
    3. Weidner R,
    4. Sparing R,
    5. Fink GR.
    Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 16360–16368.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section