The interrelated effects of 2D angiographic morphological variables and aneurysm rupture

References

1. ↵
   1. UCAS Japan Investigators,
   2. Morita A,
   3. Kirino T,
   4. Hashi K,
   5. Aoki N,
   6. Fukuhara S,
   7. et al.

   (2012) The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 366, 2474–2482.
2. ↵
   1. A.D.A.M. Inc. Medical Encyclopedia

   Aneurysm in the brain: Aneurysm - cerebral; Cerebral aneurysm. [Updated 2014 May 16] (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda (MD)) Available from URL: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001414.htm.
3. ↵
   (1998) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms--risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med 339, 1725–1733.
4. ↵
   1. Wiebers DO,
   2. Whisnant JP,
   3. Huston J 3rd.,
   4. Meissner I,
   5. Brown RD Jr.,
   6. Piepgras DG,
   7. et al.

   (2003) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362, 103–110.
5. ↵
   1. Broderick JP,
   2. Brott TG,
   3. Duldner JE,
   4. Tomsick T,
   5. Leach A

   (1994) Initial and recurrent bleeding are the major causes of death following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 25, 1342–1347.
6. 1. Fogelholm R,
   2. Hernesniemi J,
   3. Vapalahti M

   (1993) Impact of early surgery on outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A population-based study. Stroke 24, 1649–1654.
7. ↵
   1. Horowitz M

   (2009) Guidelines for the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the first annual J. Lawrence Pool Memorial Research Symposium--Controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 64, E577.
8. 1. Komotar RJ,
   2. Mocco J,
   3. Solomon RA

   (2008) Guidelines for the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium--controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 62, 183–194.
9. ↵
   1. Lee T,
   2. Baytion M,
   3. Sciacca R,
   4. Mohr JP,
   5. Pile-Spellman J

   (2005) Aggregate analysis of the literature for unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26, 1902–1908.
10. ↵
    1. Ujiie H,
    2. Tamano Y,
    3. Sasaki K,
    4. Hori T

    (2001) Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 48, 495–503.
11. ↵
    1. Hoh BL,
    2. Sistrom CL,
    3. Firment CS,
    4. Fautheree GL,
    5. Velat GJ,
    6. Whiting JH,
    7. et al.

    (2007) Bottleneck factor and height-width ratio: association with ruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 61, 716–723.
12. ↵
    1. Baharoglu MI,
    2. Schirmer CM,
    3. Hoit DA,
    4. Gao BL,
    5. Malek AM

    (2010) Aneurysm inflow-angle as a discriminant for rupture in sidewall cerebral aneurysms: morphometric and computational fluid dynamic analysis. Stroke 41, 1423–1430.
13. ↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Burgess JE,
    4. Pergolizzi RS,
    5. Sheridan MJ,
    6. Putman CM

    (2005) Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26, 2550–2559.
14. ↵
    1. Lall RR,
    2. Eddleman CS,
    3. Bendok BR,
    4. Batjer HH

    (2009) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and the assessment of rupture risk based on anatomical and morphological factors: sifting through the sands of data. Neurosurg Focus 26, E2.
15. ↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Sheridan M,
    3. Putman CM

    (2010) Hemodynamics and bleb formation in intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31, 304–310.
16. ↵
    1. Lauric A,
    2. Baharoglu MI,
    3. Malek AM

    (2012) Ruptured status discrimination performance of aspect ratio, height/width, and bottleneck factor is highly dependent on aneurysm sizing methodology. Neurosurgery 71, 38–46.
17. ↵
    1. Wiebers DO,
    2. Whisnant JP,
    3. O’Fallon WM

    (1981) The natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. N Engl J Med 304, 696–698.
18. ↵
    1. Baharoglu MI,
    2. Lauric A,
    3. Gao BL,
    4. Malek AM

    (2012) Identification of a dichotomy in morphological predictors of rupture status between sidewall- and bifurcation-type intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 116, 871–881.
19. ↵
    1. Sato K,
    2. Imai Y,
    3. Ishikawa T,
    4. Matsuki N,
    5. Yamaguchi T

    (2008) The importance of parent artery geometry in intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. Med Eng Phys 30, 774–782.
20. ↵
    1. Rahman M,
    2. Smietana J,
    3. Hauck E,
    4. Hoh B,
    5. Hopkins N,
    6. Siddiqui A,
    7. et al.

    (2010) Size ratio correlates with intracranial aneurysm rupture status: a prospective study. Stroke 41, 916–920.
21. ↵
    1. Rengier F,
    2. Weber TF,
    3. Giesel FL,
    4. Bockler D,
    5. Kauczor HU,
    6. von Tengg-Kobligk H

    (2009) Centerline analysis of aortic CT angiographic examinations: benefits and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192, W255–W63.
22. ↵
    1. Diehm N,
    2. Herrmann P,
    3. Dinkel HP

    (2004) Multidetector CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for aortoiliac length measurements prior to endovascular AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 11, 527–534.
23. ↵
    1. Amenta PS,
    2. Yadla S,
    3. Campbell PG,
    4. Maltenfort MG,
    5. Dey S,
    6. Ghosh S,
    7. et al.

    (2012) Analysis of nonmodifiable risk factors for intracranial aneurysm rupture in a large, retrospective cohort. Neurosurgery 70, 693–701.
24. ↵
    1. Ryu CW,
    2. Kwon OK,
    3. Koh JS,
    4. Kim EJ

    (2011) Analysis of aneurysm rupture in relation to the geometric indices: aspect ratio, volume, and volume-to-neck ratio. Neuroradiology 53, 883–889.
25. ↵
    1. Carter BS,
    2. Sheth S,
    3. Chang E,
    4. Sethl M,
    5. Ogilvy CS

    (2006) Epidemiology of the size distribution of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: smaller size of distal aneurysms and increasing size of unruptured aneurysms with age. Neurosurgery 58, 217–223.